By contrast, Civilization IV, which did make some sacrifices for multiplayer, is still a blast months later single player. I love playing an 8 player tiny map on the American plains at Prince level. Other times I'll split it up into different islands. Hey, thanks for the tip Frogboy. I'd be seriously hurting waiting for GC2 to be done if not for GC1, Civ3 and now Civ4. It would be hard to debate that multiplayer should be part of the base gam
Wulfer
Alright! I guess I'm one in a thousand that has a working game. I have had some CTDs and some other slowdowns/shimmys. It would be nice to have a perfectly running game out of the shoot, however at least for me, it is playable for long periods of time w/o too much of a problem. I took a chance on civ 4 but was really tired of the bs diplomacy system in civ 3. There are alot of things in civ 4 that are different from civ 3; there are
Multiplayer? I will never play it even when it comes out. Give me a game with replayablity, just like GC1, and I'll be as happy as I can be!
ngle player game is the focus of GC2.
Wulfer, here and accounted for....
> #2 is the best looking close up, in my opinion As for realism, will the metal alloys or composite structures created in the future have a high sheen or have a flat appearance? I believe that both are possible.
d? More likely, it is simply the texture blending with the forest/grasslland area(s) adjacent? Wulfer
if" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle">')