an insult to immotion, she moves lustily through space saying everything she needs to just by laughing in your face she’s so insular and evil but its’ ceased somehow to matter theres’ still fellow upon fellow tossing hearts and flowers at ‘er she’s lucid when she tells you that she likes you on your knees but she’s wasted w
oh sal, i hope you didn't think for a moment that i inferred you, or anybody else for that matter. i was just trying to get us all to take it a little less seriously and your comments are so welcome !. in fact, i've never had an offensive comment in my blog, ever !. mig XXX
do ranty replies get you riled ? ... are caustic critical comments constantly choking your creativity ? ... do pushy people pelt you with profuse personal put-downs ? ... well, next time a comment offends your sensibilities, don’t go barmy, just go bingo by subjecting it to the “ blog blah blah bingo ” test below.<B
i'm still here too .. still solving thanks you guys mig XX
Reply By: greywar 1/ spontaneous or stable ? stable 2/ passive or aggressive ? aggressive 3/ monogamous or experimental ? monogamous 4/ material or spiritual ? spiritual 5/ talented or driven ? driven greywar, i was waiting for someone to do this .. heh ... you have the sa
1. Philosophy. The theory that physical matter is the only reality and that everything, including thought, feeling, mind, and will, can be explained in terms of matter and physical phenomena. cs guy, that's a good point. you chose materialism based on it's meaning as above , and not i
Also because my wife is one of the most spiritual women I know, who has put our family above any quest for money, fame, cars, what have you. gideon, it's wonderful to see how much you value that quality in your wife. i like to think that my husband may feel the same, despite his grumbling and moani
Nothing wrong with being loving and tactful yeah !. what he said ! gideon ... well done, you mig XX
well capt, i guess it means that you must distinguish irritation from anger, and that you need to accept that you have a right to feel anger occasionally - it is a normal human response - but that you need to ensure that you express it in a way that won't just compound the situation. mig XX ps: maybe you call everone dude and i'm making a moot point, but i'm actually female. heh <img src="../images/smiles/smile.gif" b
5. driven - this is the one area where I chose a complete foil. I consider myself to be marginally talented, but have seen ample evidence that even marginally talented individuals, marketed correctly, can be successful in this day and age. I just need someone to give me a kick in the arse sometimes . <
This is fucking amazing mig ( damn I suck at commenting on poems ) macky, you don't. you don't !. this is a great comment. it's exactly the kind of reaction i like. i'm sort of relieved that you said that actually, cause i think that about some of your stuff, and then i write this nice flowery com
capt., all of your emotions are valid, it's just that anger is less societally "acceptable". once created, tension needs to go somewhere. we can either direct it outwards at what we think is the "cause", or we can internalise it, as you do. what you seem to be doing is mentally occupying the space between intention and action, and electing not to display a negative reaction for fear of causing harm or offence to another. that just make
sarah, i'm late. as usual ... and i don't know how to post photos !!!! but here is something you'll find representative of me in general, i think. i hope it will do. thanks for your help with the "comments" article: Link mig/vanessa XX
Have you read about our Patriot Act? wisefawn, i'm guessing you mean in relevance to it being an offence to have unlawful access to stored communications ?. (ie: intentionally access without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided ?). whilst that does
I did a search today to see what other blog sites I could find and compare them to JU, and see if they all follow a similar pattern, or of their are huge differences. Now maybe I'm just completely loyal I don't know, but none of the ones I came across were even close to JU, biased maybe? sal, i was
... oh, i know ... but i should have said that what you've done so far is worthy of congratulations in itself mig XX
A lot of people don't realize that these comments and articles written in cyber space can and sometimes do come back to bite them in the posterior regions. exactly, mason. but it seems they may be about to <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-B
well done, mason. that was fast. congratulations mig XX
In our recent election, a candidate got a lot of heat over comments he made *Ten* years ago on a web forum. So it will be interesting to see how this blogging thing works out. exactly, david. with nasties like retroactive legislation on the loose, plus the western assumption that we are exempt fro
thanks shadowwar. i needed that laugh mig XXX
sent to prison for speaking your mind on your blog ... that couldn’t happen to you , right ? "reporters without borders*" is a group that highlights the plight of people imprisoned and branded as “cyber-dissidents” for publishing their views on the internet. their website reports that 72 online authors worldwide have been charge
very nice rant. i thoroughly enjoy it and im happy that you are now an official part of the ltm site. sunday is launch day! thanks, jesse. i'm happy to be an "official" part of the ltm site, too. your sunday is my monday so i have a few days to prepare myself for my ahem "profile". ...and
gene, i have a private audience, too. you're on it. as is kingbee. and king is usually the only one that finds the articles because, as you say, he comes into your blog itself (as i do). i'm happy to be in your clique, but i'd be much happier if i hadn't made a thoughtless remark that offended you in my blog. it's difficult for me to overstate how hard i try never to cause harm to anyone. i did apologise in that thread, but i wante
No worries. I won't comment on these anymore. I don't know why I bothered. gene, your support of me here on ju means an awful lot to me, and i'm not beyond saying that in a very public way. i can only apologise and hope you come back to see it. i'm so sorry. i really am. if i thought for a second
That's a great line Mig, as usual I'm impressed and in awe of your way with words and emotions thanks, carlos. (i decided i'd use your name sometimes ). i wish i was as as "under control" as this poem <img src="../images/smiles
JoeUser Forums