This is not an uncommon practice with software.
For example:
I pay a fee for SecureCRT. It is a program to manage my network switches.
I pay $$ for a 1 year support maintenance which entitles me to free updates for that period of time.
I must pay again if I want to upgrade to a newer version and my annual support/maintenance period has expired.
Agreed, its not uncommon. I'm don't mind paying for a "next version upgrades" because as long as my software is not crippled I can still forgo the upgrade and stay with the version I have. Honestly, I rarely notice any performance or visual difference in Fences upgrades.
I'm not opposed to paying subscriptions if there is value to me. It may sound trivial, but the fact Stardock IMO is turning to a more "Corporate Greed" model on this product for the same price as it was without subscription just rubs me the wrong way for some reason. If the price for subscription based Fences was like $5.99 then this would make sense. My brain says this:
- $ 5.99 Annual Subscription - free updates for one year/ crippled if not renewed
- $12.99 Version License with updates with discounted upgrades to next model / never made unusable
- $39.99 Lifetime License for all versions: exactly what it implies
Since businesses like to tout "Support" as what they are getting, offer support for any of the above for an additional $4.99 and see how many people really think they need it for this software. Truth be told, support comes for most through user forums and THAT is free.
Regardless, Stardock doesn't care what I have to say and unless sales drop they will not change their mind. Its really a mute point.
Lucky for me, the reason for my looking at getting a 3rd or 4th license for fences may be unneeded. My new corporate laptop is locked down so without admin rights I can't even install Fences. I will deactivate my license on my current personal laptop I have been using for work and use it on my new PC instead.
I love fences, thank you Stardock for a very cool way to stay organized!
Cheers,