The flares have been known to affect the electro transmission of many earthly communication devices including computers, cell phones, pagers and automobiles
ever heard of the saying "its not the fall that kills you, its the sudden stop at the end"
thats what this means. nobody in the history of the US has ever been directly affected by a solar flare, its the coronal mass ejection from the flare that causes the disruption in electronics.
A solar flare is a violent explosion in the Sun's atmosphere with an energy equivalent to a billion megatons, traveling normally at about 1 million km per hour (about 0.05% the speed of light), though sometimes much faster. The flares have been known to affect the electro transmission of many earthly communication devices including computers, cell phones, pagers and automobiles. Solar flares take place in the solar corona and chromosphere, heating plasma to tens of millions of kelvins and accelerating the resulting electrons, protons and heavier ions to near the speed of light . They produce electromagnetic radiation across the electromagnetic spectrum at all wavelengths from long-wave radio to the shortest wavelength gamma rays. Most flares occur around sunspots, where intense magnetic fields emerge from the Sun's surface into the corona. The energy efficiency associated with solar flares may take several hours or even days to build up, but most flares take only a matter of minutes to release their energy
any kindergardner knows this. what is your point.
a flare is the sudden movement of massive parts of a star within its corona, the particles that emerge from the system are not part of the flare.
actually, the way the magnetic fields of the star twist and break before a flare are very interesting, it creates a collosal magnetic spiral that was originally attatched to a much larger, straited field. the charged particles fly up and around through a huge, bent tunnel of electromagnetic charge. its really interesting that something so simple macroscopically can be so complex on a smaller scale.
however, nobody on earth has ever been affected by a solar flare, not a one. just like nobody has ever died from falling.
Notice the part earth communication device can be effect on earth
quoting without noting? shame on you.
and like I said, its the CME accompanying the flare that causes the damage.
That a trillion denser than atom and yet is stable in sun for more than a year
no, a neutron star is one of the most unstable things we know of. what keeps if from flying apart (and sometimes causes it to fly apart) is gravity.
This principle is significant, because it explains why matter occupies space exclusively for itself and does not allow other space material objects to pass through it, while at the same time allowing light and radiation to pass. It states that no two identical fermions may occupy the same quantum state simultaneously
huh... this looks oddly like...
a quote! from WIKI!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle
All it said is there is repulse force it won't stop them from forming a stable stat of matter
no, what it says is that no matter how hard you try to crunch atoms closer together, they wont go.
and while PEP applies only to fermions, the same principle works on protons and neutrons.
now, to quote from scientific american:
Because of the Pauli principle, the last thing in the world these particles want to do at low temperatures is condencse. In fact, they exhibit just the opposite tendancy. If you compress, say, a gas of electrons (note, its not exclusive), cooling it to a low temperature and shrinking the volume, the electrons are forced to begin to invade one another's space. But Pauli's principle forbids this, so they dart away from one another at speeds that approach that of light.
this is called degeneracy pressure. that pressure caused by PEP completely annihilates any chance of you creating a gas significantly more compact than a solid. it is simply not possible.
the reason neutron stars get around this is because protons are simply neutrons without electrons (well, being overly simplistic anyhow). protons and beta particles come together to create neutrons, the neutrons become compact et cetera et cetera.
In other word because vacuum has no thermal energy it exist in a natural form of NEAR not absolute zero. Because electron/proton/neutron is not full of energy they don't even attraction nor repulse which make it possible to have atom closer together than possible.
did you miss the part where this ruins your own arguement?
And yet that the only website to use space age in context of decoy of bone. People who don't use space age will be confuse by it's other context, the one of starting of space technology and spaceflight much like Information Age.
careful, scientists use it to.
Humans adapt to spaceflight with fluid redistribution, altered cardiovascular function, disrupted visual/sensory/motor orientation, transient anemia, loss of muscle mass, and site-specific bone loss
its not 'adaptation', our bodies become disoriented because they have been carved out to be functional in a gravitational field. flowers, for instance, cannot grow correctly outside a gravitational field, its not an "adaptation" for them to grow their roots upwards, its a dysfunction of being placed in space.
childspeak 101, the formal name is English 1 but whatever. There are many level of English classes and What I use for this is basically High School English which is why I think you are having hard time understand let alone Elizabethan Era(better known as Shakespeare).
well obviously you dont speak english.
It is jumbled to only to you apparently
you know, I dont understand your level of simple redundancy. you cant keep your facts or words straight, yet you persist. why?
Due to their tissue penetrating property, gamma rays/X-rays have a wide variety of medical uses such as in CT Scans and radiation therapy (see X-ray).
And yet we use shield for X-ray.
did you miss the part in life where they taught you that x-rays injure the body? maybe THATS why they use it to kill
cancerous cells. I'm sure you never thought of that.
Didn't take me long to find out that neutron radiation is weaker than gamma so what we use for gamma is enough. We use metal about one feet thick which is NOT massive for x-ray because I took one before they had a Faraday cage metal wall, metal door that is easy to push and etc...
you seem to be missing the part where immediate damage is NOT the issue. its extended damage. nothing we have has both sufficient protection to keep out all increased level of radiation AND is light enough in space.
You nit I said bulkiness in the sense of starship inertia pushing the adjunct object much like grab a rope of a tailer and walk while you use your inertia to overcome the second object inertia
FIX the goddamn sentances. REREAD what you post. OR JUST LEARN ENGLISH
you have the option.
The same example, As you hold the rope you start to walk at first it is hard to pull because of inertia from non-move state when you overcome it. The object starting to convert non-move inertia into have a state of moving inertia thus never disappearing. BTW Sorry if any of the above didn't make sense just walk outside and play with a rock that is half of your weight will certainly make help understand if not completely.
there isnt such thing as 'non-move' inertia, its a question of related frames of referance.
and I'm sorry that you seem to not understand that your sentance on how inertia disappears in space is the issue, I'm completely aware of what inertia is.
let me bring this down to the simplest terms possible, maybe you'll understand;
you said weight dissapears in space, and for that reason space ships can hold big bags of rocks without affecting their movement.
yes, weight dissapears in space, but that has nothing to do with the movement of spaceships. if you meant inertia in saying weight, inertia does not dissapear in space.
just read the sentance!
Rock without weight is practically non-bulky and easily anchor on the outer hull. If you want me to I can pull up several such articles.
bags of rocks will indeed be an issue for a ship.
Yes we can detect something without force it to interface with us. Guess you haven't heard of string theory yet.
you couldnt be more wrong.
you need to measure something, in order to measure something you must have information, in order to have information you must have some interaction
you can measure and interact with gravity (for godsake, g, gravitational constant) same goes for photons, you dont know its there until you've interacted with it in some way. its physically impossible to detect something without having its emissions of one sort or another.
Several decades after the discovery of general relativity it was realized that it cannot be the complete theory of gravity because it is incompatible with quantum mechanics. Later it was understood that it is possible to describe gravity in the framework of quantum field theory like the other fundamental forces. In this framework the attractive force of gravity arises due to exchange of virtual gravitons, in the same way as the electromagnetic force arises from exchange of virtual photons.
if you have been paying attention to any modern science at all you would know that unification of general relativity, special relativity and quantum mechanics HAS NOT HAPPENED. for that reason gravitons are simply a single route in many different roads of theorey, there is no confirmation of it.
quantum mechanics tries to reconcile through gravitons, but general relativity describes gravity as the bending of spacetime. if we knew the answer then we would know if there are gravitons or not.
we dont know the answer.
Don't be confuse by the virtual because it is just a working theory for now
1) a
working theory is the key word here. its got many flaws to it.
2) who would be confused?
I agree that it is not "measurable", merely observed
thats like saying you can "observe" pain. you can see how it affects someone, same way you can see inertia affects interactions, however you cannot 'observe' pain. its not a physical existance that can be observed, its a non-concrete idea that sums up laws of interactions.
Much like observing that light from the sun hit something and create a contrast between shadow and bright, however can't "measure" how fast it is with just your eye.
this comparison has nothing to do with inertia, a photon is a physical object. light is a physical object. its quantifiable and can be observed.
however contrast is an idea, you cannot observe contrast in the sense of "I see differences" what you see are two things that are non-alike, but you cannot actually SEE a 'difference in color' it is not a physical thing.
this summation will no doubt confuse you. I'm not refering to a difference in color as two different measurements that are compared, I'm describing that a difference is not something that can be observed directly, as it does not exist, but is rather created through comparison
inertia is the same, it cannot be observed as it doesn't exist. however by comparing what happens to something before and during kinetic energy transfer, principles of difference arise that are summated into one thing; an idea.
