KFC Kickin For Christ KFC Kickin For Christ

He Does Look Good in His Empty Suit

▼

He Does Look Good in His Empty Suit

Don't Be Fooled!

from JoeUser Forums

by Jack Wheeler: 

The O-man, Barack Hussein Obama, is an eloquently tailored  empty suit. No resume, no accomplishments, no experience, no original ideas, no understanding of how the economy works, no understanding of how the world works, no balls, nothing but abstract, empty rhetoric devoid of real substance.  

He has no real identity. He is half-white, which he rejects. The rest of him is mostly Arab, which he hides but is disclosed by his non-African Arabic surname and his Arabic first and middle names as a way to triply proclaim his Arabic parentage to people in Kenya .

Only a small part of him is African Black from his Luo grandmother, which he pretends he is exclusively.   What he isn't, not a genetic drop of, is 'African-American,' the descendant of enslaved Africans brought to America chained in slave ships. He hasn't a single ancestor who was a slave. Instead, his Arab ancestors were slave owners. Slave-trading was the main Arab business in East Africa for centuries until the British ended it.  

Let that sink in: Obama is not the descendant of slaves, he is the descendant of slave owners. Thus he makes the perfect Liberal Messiah.   It's something Hillary doesn't understand - how some complete neophyte came out of the blue and stole the Dem nomination from her.

Obamamania is beyond politics and reason. It is a true religious cult, whose adherents reject Christianity yet still believe in Original Sin, transferring it from the evil of being human to the evil of being white.  

Thus Obama has become the white liberals' Christ, offering absolution from the Sin of Being White. There is no reason or logic behind it, no faults or flaws of his can diminish it, no arguments Hillary could make of any kind can be effective against it.

The absurdity of Hypocrisy Clothed In Human Flesh being their Savior is all the more cause for liberals to worship him: Credo quia absurdum, I believe it because it is absurd.  Thank heavens that the voting majority of Americans remain Christian and are in no desperate need of a phony savior.   

His candidacy is ridiculous and should not be taken seriously by any thinking American.

Jack Wheeler is a brilliant man who was the author of Reagan's strategy to break the back of the Soviet Union with the star wars race and expose their inner weakness. For years he wrote a weekly intelligence update that was extremely interesting and well structured and informative. He consults(ed) with several mega corporations on global trends and the future, etc. He is in semi-retirement now. He is a true patriot with a no-nonsense approach to everything. He is also a somewhat well-known mountain climber and adventurer.    

democrat
20,930 views 37 replies
Reply #26 from PolMach Forums Top

I think this is one of the saddest posts I've read about Obama's election anywhere. 

For the first time in three elections, there is no suspicion that the will of the electorate has been interfered with by the Supreme Court or election fraud.  The sanctity of the Constitution of the United States has once again been recognized - indeed, the president-elect taught Constitutional Law at the college level.  Unlike our lame-duck president, Obama and the Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress have a clear mandate from the people to move this country out of the moral, political, ethical, and economic ditches that the Republicans have driven us into.  With this one election, the credibility of the United States as a country in which all things are possible has been restored.  The world doesn't hate us or think of us as stupid any more.  Obama's ideas for cleaning up the Bush/Republican mess are numerous and specific.  An empty suit he is not.

So what did we get in this post?  Obama has "no real identity" except that "he is mostly Arab".  The first is an uninformed opinion, which is no surprise because the hallmark of a good Republican seems to be ignorance (the term "low information voter" was, after all, invented by Republican political operatives to describe the people whose votes they were going after), while the second has no basis in fact.  A so-called Christian has simply borne false witness against her neighbor, without hesitation or compunction.  This is "Christianity of convenience", sort of like that practiced by Anita Bryant back in the day.  I'll always remember with pleasure the day Ms. Bryant had to admit that she had never read the whole Bible.

Let's see, Obama's approval rating right now is 70% nationally, and this election has marked what pretty much the whole world regards as a great step forward that could only have happened in the United States.  The Republicans got their collective butts kicked.  Their candidate had no solutions to the problems Bush got us into, his running mate was Dan Quayle in a dress (apparently bought from Neiman Marcus), and the majority of states that voted Republican are the "welfare" states that receive more federal tax dollars than they pay in taxes.  Oh, the majority of states that voted Republican are also left over from the old Confederacy.  You know, the states that thought slavery was okay, and where schools had to be desegregated at the point of an American soldier's bayonet.

I hope all you terrified, disaffected Republicans pay attention to where the country is now, thanks to your boy Bush.  In four years the country (and you) will be a lot better off.

Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top

Be careful KFC you don't want to be struck down by a bolt of lightning.

Galactic Civilizations IV
Reply #28 from PolMach Forums Top

what pretty much the whole world regards as a great step forward
End of quote

Its funny because republicans say that the whole world is wrong.  All these other countries are wrong and they are right.  But when Obama wins the whole world rejoices at the chance for true freedom and cooperation among the worlds counties again.  Maybe just maybe the republicans could be wrong as most people elsewhere and now many who have seen the light here thinks they are?????

Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top

For the first time in three elections, there is no suspicion that the will of the electorate has been interfered with by the Supreme Court or election fraud.
End of quote

Only because the liberal won, and they were doing the tampering.  The sad fact is that as long as the liberals do not win, there will always be screams of tampering.  WIthout a shred of evidence to back up the claims.  But as we have seen, liberals do not care about evidence, just the claim.

Its funny because republicans say that the whole world is wrong. All these other countries are wrong and they are right.
End of quote

Actually no.  Conservatives say America is not the world.  And should not be treated like every other country in it (nor should every other country be treated like America).  Liberals say we are all the same.  There is a big difference.  I dont want to tell the english what to do with their country.  But that is not true of liberal english.

Reply #30 from PolMach Forums Top

Only because the liberal won, and they were doing the tampering. The sad fact is that as long as the liberals do not win, there will always be screams of tampering. WIthout a shred of evidence to back up the claims. But as we have seen, liberals do not care about evidence, just the claim.
End of quote

Bush/gore 2000 there was plenty of proof that jeb did some pretty shady stuff but we'll just sweep that under the rug.  Fact is that there are low qaulity people on both side that will do anything to win.  I wonder if you will admit that DRGUY or are all conservatives totally truthful all the of the time?

Liberals say we are all the same.
End of quote

We are in some ways, we are all people and we all have reason and common sense and the ability to ell right from wrong(most of us do anyway).  Usually if you take some type of action say for example you were to sue someone for damage to your house and you tell your story to 10 of your friends(whom you trust to be honest to you).  Then 9 of them, after hearing your story tell you that you shouldnt, that you dont really have a case.  Would you say screw you to those 9 and just listen to the 1?  If you did most likely you would lose your case because a jury is made up of a selection of your peers(meaning that most people would probably feel as your 9 firends did).  Its the same with nations because nations are people and if so many of them say to us that what Bush is doing is adversely affecting the world, then maybe we should at least listen to them rather than telling them to go spit as they say.

Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top

Be careful KFC you don't want to be struck down by a bolt of lightning.
End of quote

don't worry MM I've got my lightening rod fastened pretty tightly. 

But when Obama wins the whole world rejoices at the chance for true freedom and cooperation among the worlds counties again.
End of quote

again?  you mean like when Clinton was president?  Hmmmm I seem to remember an awful lot of bombing going on during his administration that led to our 9/11.   Do you think those living in Iraq were living in freedom then?   Exactly how free were they?  How about the rest of the world?  Was it peachy creamy then?  How about under Carter? 

Only because the liberal won, and they were doing the tampering. The sad fact is that as long as the liberals do not win, there will always be screams of tampering. WIthout a shred of evidence to back up the claims. But as we have seen, liberals do not care about evidence, just the claim.
End of quote

exactly right. 

 

 

Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top

Bush/gore 2000 there was plenty of proof that jeb did some pretty shady stuff but we'll just sweep that under the rug.
End of quote

There was NO PROOF.  A lot of allegations (see previous response) but not a shred of evidence.  Nor will you find any on a site other than the kook fringe.

I wonder if you will admit that DRGUY or are all conservatives totally truthful all the of the time?
End of quote

Truthful?  I have not touched on that issue, and it does not appear to be related to the discussion.  If you like, I will freely admit that honest politician is an oxymoron.

We are in some ways, we are all people and we all have reason and common sense and the ability to ell right from wrong(most of us do anyway).
End of quote

And going further we are the same as amoebas.  But then you can take anything to an extreme.  But America is not (note the use as a pronoun) is not like any other countries (just as it would be very difficult to find 2 countries identical anywhere else in the world).  For the most part, our system has not been exported.  Mostly the european system (thanks a lot to the imperialism of Europe from about the 15th century until the late 20th).

Its the same with nations because nations are people
End of quote

And like people, no 2 are identical.  If you try to make America like Europe (I know, not a country, but I am speaking of the collection over there that share a history), then you only ruin what is America.  Liberals do not understand that.  They think that we are all square pegs, but unfortunately there are a lot of round holes out there.

Reply #33 from PolMach Forums Top

Truthful? I have not touched on that issue, and it does not appear to be related to the discussion. If you like, I will freely admit that honest politician is an oxymoron.
End of quote

Its good you still have your sense of humor, but I am refering to all people.  Everyone lies, be it on a really small level or a large level.

Reply #34 from PolMach Forums Top

And going further we are the same as amoebas. But then you can take anything to an extreme. But America is not (note the use as a pronoun) is not like any other countries (just as it would be very difficult to find 2 countries identical anywhere else in the world). For the most part, our system has not been exported. Mostly the european system (thanks a lot to the imperialism of Europe from about the 15th century until the late 20th).
End of quote

As you have said to me I now say to you.  Cherry picking, you wont deal with my example.  But I will deal with yours.  Obviously we are different countries and have different needs, just like people we are all different but in the end have the same gols generally.  Lead a good life and be productive in whatever you do.  Same goes for nations.  But if the vast majority are not in agreement with you, and they are rational people or allies, then dont you think maybe just maybe our leaderships or brain might be on the wrong side?

They think that we are all square pegs, but unfortunately there are a lot of round holes out there.
End of quote

This is not true  we understand we are all different but we ahve many things in common.

Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top

But if the vast majority are not in agreement with you, and they are rational people or allies, then dont you think maybe just maybe our leaderships or brain might be on the wrong side?
End of quote

Cherry picking?  Hardly.  The very notion of a nation is because there are differences.  Even our closest ally (at this time, England) does not have the same goals, dreams, aspirations as we do.  Indeed, it was not until the 20th century that they even liked us.

But on to your statement above, vast majority of ....allies?  Right now, our "vast majority of allies" liked Saddam because they were getting rich off of him.  Do you support and condone that?  Answer truthfully.

But the vast majority of Americans do not disagree with me.  That is why we are American first, and not the 11 province of Canada or Englands latest commonwealth member.  The very fact that they recognize we are not a part of another nation, nor do we want to be (except for some on the left like John Kerry), indicates they agree with me.  Solving our problems is not going to entail saluting royalty, but that is part of it in ENgland (and indeed in Canada and Australia).

The more you equivocate, the more you are proving my point.  Not that I object to assistance.  By all means, please proceed.

This is not true we understand we are all different but we ahve many things in common.
End of quote

That is the first time you have unabashedly admitted you are a liberal.  The first step in any self help program is admitting your addiction.  Now we can start working on Step 2. ;)

Reply #36 from PolMach Forums Top

But the vast majority of Americans do not disagree with me. That is why we are American first, and not the 11 province of Canada or Englands latest commonwealth member.
End of quote

I get that but what you sound to be saying is that we should never listen to our friends no matter what.  Screw them and do what we want all the time no matter what.  That isnt right that is not a civilized society like we claim to be.  That is not a compassionate society either.  That is a society that dictates to others.  Kinda like Stalin did, or Hitler did. Now dont go all ape over that comment like I know you would.  I am not saying we are hitlers or stalins but I am saying that that is one of the types of things they did.  Do we really want to draw any kind of comparison with them at all?

Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top

get that but what you sound to be saying is that we should never listen to our friends no matter what
End of quote

No, I am saying we should not be dictated to. Nor try to ape them.  You have a nice house, but that is not my style.  I want early American furniture, not Modern Deco.  WHy?  Because that is my most comfortable style.

That isnt right that is not a civilized society like we claim to be.
End of quote

Listening to me about my home style life is not being compassionate.  Nor is depriving people of health care because some bureaucrat says it is not necessary.  Quite simply you are trying to say we are not compassionate because we do things differently, and that isthe most arrogant view of things.  If they were gods then you would be right, but as long as no one is a god, then there will always be different ways to do things that may not be the same, but are equally valid.