Dear President Obama

Dear President Obama:

I am a Demoncrat.  I voted for you.  I believed that you were sincere in your message of 'change we can believe in' and felt you offered a needed and welcome change from the politics as usual that Washington seems so fond of.  And after the economy became the primary issue, I especially supported your message of personal responsibility. 

I am writing to tell you that I am bitterly disappointed in what you are doing.

This Stimulus Package that you have just signed is a perfect example of how you have turned your back on the very things you promised us.  What happened to your promise to go through things line by line?  Did you even read this bill in its entirety?  Where was the promise of eliminating wasteful government spending?  My understanding is that this bill, to a large extent, hands money to various governmental agencies without any real plan (let alone a checks and balance system) for what is done with the funds.  How much more wasteful could government spending be (aside from giving more money to failing businesses)?  And I'm pretty sure you promised to get rid of pork barreling, but it seems to me that that's what the majority of this bill is.  This is a continuation of politics as usual, Mr. President, as this bill embodies partisan politics at its worst:  After 8 years as the minority, the Democrats saw their chance to fund pet projects and that's what your Stimulus Plan became, despite whatever you intended.  Had you lived up to your promise to go through it line by line, had you eliminated wasteful spending and pork barrel proposals, then we might have ended up with a real plan that would move us towards recovery a bit sooner.  Instead, we have thrown good money after bad, funding those things that Democrats feel will help with their re-election efforts.  And when things improve, as they inevitably will no matter what action is taken, the Democrats will be happy to take credit for that, even though it would have happened anyway and this incredibly irresponsible spending probably prolonged the crisis.

Times are tough, Mr. President, even for people like us who have done everything right.  But you are sending a terrible message, especially to our children, by offering bailouts to those who have done everything wrong.  This is the direct opposite of encouraging personal responsibility; instead you are encouraging greed and irresponsibility by eliminating the consequences.  I can't believe that those are the values you are imparting to your girls, so why would you reward others for behaviour you wouldn't allow in your own home?  We have never been in debt, mortgage aside.  We have never carried a balance on a credit card.  We have never lived beyond our means.  But even though we are the ones the mortgage company can rely on, the only way we can get a better deal on our mortgage is by NOT paying it.  Does that make sense?  Shouldn't we be the ones who are rewarded for doing the right thing?  Shouldn't the reliable people be the ones who are encouraged to continue doing the right thing, instead of being told that the only way to get ahead is to do the exact things that got us into this mess?  And on a larger scale, isn't this what we're telling businesses as well?  It's the small businesses, who did everything right and are trying desparately to hang on, that are going to fail, while we continue to bolster the giants who might benefit more from having to deal with the reality of their mistakes.  Yes, letting them fail will cause unemployment which will have a ripple effect.  But perhaps your Stimulus Bill could have addressed that aspect more comprehensively (rather than funding extraneous, unrelated items) so that restructuring our economy, which will happen no matter what you do and is necessary, could occur sooner rather than later, and before we waste billions of dollars trying to forestall the inevitable.

Mr. President, I truly want you to succeed.  I think that you have so much to offer our country and I hope that you fulfill the promise that so many see in you.  But I am so distraught over your first steps, for my own family and for our country.  Please keep sight of the changes you promised to enact--now more than ever is the time to fulfill those promises.

   

4,981 views 28 replies
Reply #1 Top

I believed that you were sincere in your message of 'change we can believe in' and felt you offered a needed and welcome change from the politics as usual that Washington seems so fond of.
End of quote

I'm curious as to why you believed this in the first place?  Obama is a Chicago politician, he has plenty of roots of corruption, much of his life was covered up by the media.

So once again, why are you surprised?

Reply #2 Top

He's showing his true colors as the puppet that he is.  Pelosi and Co. are pulling his strings and he's flopping along.  He's a great speaker, an ambitious man, I don't even think he is evil like a lot of people on the right seem to think, I just don't and never did think he really knew what it would take to get this huge mess we're in turned around.  The promise after promise he spewed to get those votes showed that. 

He's got a good start on breaking promises.  Give him a little more time, he'll get to them all.

Reply #3 Top

I never had any illusions that Obama would be anything but another flawed politician. I'm hoping this is just the inexperience and that he's the fast learner we hope he is but I also don't think there's really any experience that would have prepared someone for this shitstorm. It's hard to pin him down, he's confident to the point of arrogance but then he's quick to show humility and admit his mistakes.

I think it's important that the honeymoon ends quickly and the people who voted for him wipe the stars out of their eyes, stop feeding the fantasy and then clarify the change we wanted was from politics as usual not just republican politics as usual.

Reply #4 Top

I thought it was mccain that promised to get rid of pork and obama that said that pork is insignificant in the overall budget.

Reply #5 Top

I think it's important that the honeymoon ends quickly and the people who voted for him wipe the stars out of their eyes, stop feeding the fantasy and then clarify the change we wanted was from politics as usual not just republican politics as usual.
End of quote

Right on.

Reply #6 Top

I'm hoping this is just the inexperience and that he's the fast learner we hope he is but I also don't think there's really any experience that would have prepared someone for this shitstorm.
End of quote

I am truly hoping people did not voting for him thinking he could learn thru experience while in office as oppose to having experience ahead of time. I can't help but continuing to think people will get what they deserve which is the same as what they voted for.

I think it's important that the honeymoon ends quickly and the people who voted for him wipe the stars out of their eyes, stop feeding the fantasy and then clarify the change we wanted was from politics as usual not just republican politics as usual.
End of quote

Well, I have to say this is the best line I have read in any article about Obama so far. I give you 5* for that comment.

Reply #7 Top

I am truly hoping people did not voting for him thinking he could learn thru experience while in office as oppose to having experience ahead of time.
End of quote

They did... after all he is such a SMART person...

Reply #8 Top

They did... after all he is such a SMART person...
End of quote

If so then we may as well give up on any chance of voting in a decent politician (I know, I know, that's a contradiction of itself but you know what I mean).

Reply #9 Top

I mean really, asking if its not what they expected, its like you have never debated politics with a liberal before.

Reply #10 Top

For God's sake give him a chance. He's only been there a month. Are you such a fortune teller that you know the package won't work? And even if it does not work, who did he inherit this mess from? The allocation of funds is not going to please everyone but let's hope some of it works.

Reply #11 Top

For God's sake give him a chance.
End of quote

The man passed an $800 billion bill in less than 2 weeks. What planet you live on? That is not a good thing buddy. We gave him a chance and he blew it and even those who voted for him are seeing the reality that is a disaster of an Administration. Of course you are the kind of person who wants to see something burn down before you call it a fire.

Are you such a fortune teller that you know the package won't work?
End of quote

Do you know if it will? It's called a stimulus package yet half of it will not stimulate the economy, you are definitely follower.

And even if it does not work, who did he inherit this mess from?
End of quote

Democrats actually, not that you would notice. It's all Bush's fault because it happened under his watch, God forbid anyone check to see why it happened at all.

The allocation of funds is not going to please everyone but let's hope some of it works.
End of quote

We need a solution, not a temporay patch that will eventually fall off leaving the wound open again.

Reply #12 Top

Your blamning Bush days are over, from here on anything that happens to the economy is all Obama's fault.

It's a shame you didn't give judi the right to be upset over Obama's decisions, there you have it judi, you're own people cutting you off for not standing by them.

Reply #13 Top

Quoting adnauseam, reply 10
For God's sake give him a chance. He's only been there a month. Are you such a fortune teller that you know the package won't work? And even if it does not work, who did he inherit this mess from? The allocation of funds is not going to please everyone but let's hope some of it works.
End of adnauseam's quote

This was the first chance he had to follow through on what he promised.  He had the opportunity to go through the way funds were allocated and call foul on things that weren't going to help stimulate the economy.  Yes, funding the arts is nice, but it seems like a low priority when the economy is tanking.  Funding clean coal technology to the tune of 1 BILLION dollars?  I hate to be the voice of doom and gloom, but there is no such thing and even a billion won't come up with a way to use coal as a fuel cleanly.  The bill turned into a Congressional re-election package and he just signed off on it.

Realistically, no matter how bad it gets, things will correct themselves regardless of what anyone does.  So why not use this opportunity to help people get through this cycle in the best way possible, instead of asking taxpayers to foot the bill for pet projects?  I'd be happy to help those who need it, and deserve it--but not when that help comes with the additional price tag of wasting my money.

And to clarify, I do support Obama.  As I said in the original letter--which I sent to him as well as posting here--I want him to succeed.  But I am disappointed that he didn't use this opportunity to do what he said he would do.  If not now, when?

Finally, the roots of this mess actually go back to Clinton--another Democrat.  I guess I just like beating my head against the wall...

Reply #14 Top

For God's sake give him a chance. He's only been there a month. Are you such a fortune teller that you know the package won't work? And even if it does not work, who did he inherit this mess from? The allocation of funds is not going to please everyone but let's hope some of it works.
End of quote

Oh please!  Government spending and welfare has never worked.  He inherited this mess from the entire government, many of the same people and agencies who support this bill.

And now today, he's giving even more billions to people to pay their mortgages.  Where is all this money coming from?

 

Reply #15 Top

Here's more of that "change".

In rushing to pull together a landmark economic stimulus package last week, Democratic lawmakers and the White House added billions in new spending and tax breaks that will benefit a handful of specific companies and industries.

<!-- var rn = ( Math.round( Math.random()*10000000000 ) ); document.write('<s\cript src="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/14/AR2009021401724_StoryJs.js?'+rn+'"></s\cript>') ; // -->

The final bill, approved by Congress on Friday, includes $8 billion in unplanned spending specifically requested by President Obama for regional high-speed rail projects, according to administration officials. New language sought by General Motors will save the beleaguered Detroit automaker from paying up to $10 billion in taxes related to its acceptance of federal bailout funds.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/14/AR2009021401724.html?sid=ST2009021401730

Reply #16 Top

Quoting adnauseam, reply 10
For God's sake give him a chance. He's only been there a month. Are you such a fortune teller that you know the package won't work? And even if it does not work, who did he inherit this mess from? The allocation of funds is not going to please everyone but let's hope some of it works.
End of adnauseam's quote

1. That is like saying "maybe the fire will not burn down the house"... the house is on FIRE... specifically, he blew it... time has no relation to messing up. It took obama all of two weeks to pass an 800 billion disaster that will result in a massive downward spiral of the economy. I HOPED he would not mess up, he did.

2. How do we know? aside from our basic understanding of money and the economy, there is also the fact that any accredited organization, including the bi partisan comitte of congress of watching for such things, has calculated that this bill will stifle the economy, it will not only not stimulate it, but it will reduce our overall GDP for the next 10 years.

3. How do YOU know that it WILL work? obama is a LAWYER not an economist or mathematician. In fact he has shown poor skills in those fields before by supporting the "affordable housing" initiative and acorn... So how exactly does anyone expect or plan a pork filled wasteful spending project that creates no jobs and wastes almost a trillion of taxpayer money (sorry, taxpayer DEBT) to help the economy?

Reply #17 Top

  

"Finally, the roots of this mess actually go back to Clinton--another Democrat.  I guess I just like beating my head against the wall..."--Judi75

Actually, this entire mess dates back to the Community Re-Investment Act of 1977...under Carter, yes, another Democrat. Clinton only bolstered it, as a means to buy votes from his poorer continuents. This made the growing mess even worse.

I'm telling you; call me a conspiracy nut if you like, but Obama is a Socialist, and his plan for "change in America" is Socialism. plain and simple. And he's got Pelosi and Reid, two more slightly less radical wingnuts, behind him.

The plan for implementing Socialized medicine was buried deep inside the stimulus bill.....same old same old; if they know they'll have difficulty getting something passed on its own merits, they just sneak it into another bill, and get it passed that way.

Politics as usual. I think....I hope....many Obamaniacs will come to their senses by 2012; judi might be well on her way.;)

Of course, the damage he, and his radical comrades (a term I don't use lightly) in the House and Senate, could do to this great nation by then, could well be irreparable.

Reply #18 Top

for there to be a conspiracy someone has to be doing things in secret. There are plenty of interviews and the like where he says that is his plan, people VOTED for him because that is his plan... there is no conspiracy, there is simply a plan to socialize america, and people want it.

Reply #19 Top

No...people voted for him becuase he wasn't Bush. And millions of blacks---many, many, many who had never voted before and likely won't again, after 2012---came out and voted for a black man. A black man they didn't bother to read up on before falling for his schtick. He was black; that was good enogh for them. Young people voted for him because it's the PC thing to do; that, and the media they worship told them how great he was.

That's what the people voted for.

Reply #20 Top

I'm hoping this is just the inexperience and that he's the fast learner we hope he is but I also don't think there's really any experience that would have prepared someone for this shitstorm. It's hard to pin him down, he's confident to the point of arrogance but then he's quick to show humility and admit his mistakes
End of quote

You mean when a person is having surgery they will look for the newest doctor, fresh out of med school? Or hope they get the kid that hangs around the auto shop when their car needs repairs? This is what I don't understand about the people that voted for this man. Why would you want the least experienced person in the top job? Sorry that is not the place to test out your training wheels. THIS IS THE PROBLEM. Of course his supporters cried racism. I'd have the same problem with anyone, Republican or Democrat, seeking this office.

stop feeding the fantasy and then clarify the change we wanted was from politics as usual not just republican politics as usual.
End of quote

Because we all know how much better Democrat politic is (Dodd, Frank, Pelosi, Reid, Blago, the current group of tax evaders, and on and on).

Reply #21 Top

JUDI75 WRITES:

I believed that you were sincere in your message of 'change we can believe in' and felt you offered a needed and welcome change from the politics as usual that Washington seems so fond of.
End of quote

Thanks for sharing your letter to Pres. Obama.

RIGHTWINGER POSTS:

I'm telling you; call me a conspiracy nut if you like, but Obama is a Socialist, and his plan for "change in America" is Socialism. plain and simple. And he's got Pelosi and Reid, two more slightly less radical wingnuts, behind him.
End of quote

It's no conspiracy.......Obama is a sincere Socialist and installing Socialism is the "change he believes in" and his #1 priority....it's just a matter of how many 'sheople' he'll take over the cliff with him.

judi75 writes:

And after the economy became the primary issue, I especially supported your message of personal responsibility.
End of quote

I must have missed Obama's message about personal responsiblity, but I'll take your word for it that he led you to believer that! But since when do Liberals, let alone Socialists, believe in personal responsiblility? Take, for example, the big 3 car industry and the mortgage debacle. Liberals can't discipline, can't allow foreclosures, can't punish, etc. Have you ever noticed that all they do is throw someone else's money (that is our taxpayer's) at problems? An dhow many of his appointees have not been personally responsible to keep up with paying their own taxes?

 

JUDI75 WRITES:

And I'm pretty sure you promised to get rid of pork barreling, but it seems to me that that's what the majority of this bill is.
End of quote

After 8 years as the minority, the Democrats saw their chance to fund pet projects and that's what your Stimulus Plan became, despite whatever you intended. Had you lived up to your promise to go through it line by line, had you eliminated wasteful spending and pork barrel proposals, then we might have ended up with a real plan that would move us towards recovery a bit sooner.
End of quote

BINGO!

Turns out in his first budget for this year alone, Obama has already outspent Pres. Bush 8 years, with 2 wars and 9/11! 

Yesterday, in the first segment of his show, Glen Beck exposed Obama as having re-inserted 3 earmarks of his own from the time when he was a Senator.  Obama's people must have been listening because by the end of the show, Beck said that he just got a report that Obama's name was removed from the earmarks so no one could put it together with him.  

Reply #22 Top

adnauseamreply 10
For God's sake give him a chance. He's only been there a month. Are you such a fortune teller that you know the package won't work? And even if it does not work, who did he inherit this mess from? The allocation of funds is not going to please everyone but let's hope some of it works.
End of quote

Here's yet another way Obama speaks out of both sides of this mouth at the  time. In one breath he talks so elequently about taking care of our children and in the next passes a budget like this one that has us robbing from our next generation. It's disgusting.

 

Reply #23 Top

But I am disappointed that he didn't use this opportunity to do what he said he would do. If not now, when?
End of quote

Props to you, judi.  You nailed it.  In his haste and inexperience, or in fear of leaving his fingerprints at the scene of the crime, he allowed the old politics as usual to dictate the most important piece of legislation he will ever sign.  He revealed he is either insecure in his role as president, more deviously corrupt than anyone knew, or not that persuasive, even within his own party.  That one bit of hubris, "We won," was the first & last expenditure of his political capital.  He's squandered all hope of fashioning any sort of bipartisan consensus by allowing his surrogates to ram this thing down our throats in completely unnecessary haste without so much as a public reading.  I was initially inclined to agree that we should 'give him a chance' and allow some time to assess his actions as opposed to his campaign rhetoric.  That time is up.  There are no other chances when you bet all your money on the first one.

He's shown spectacularly quickly that he can't be trusted to keep his word or stick to espoused principles.  The disconnect between his words and deeds is head-spinning, to say the least.

Reply #24 Top

You know what I think? I think he's afraid.....he's afraid someone will cap him before he gets anything much done. I honestly believe that; and I really think that's why he's hurrying all this stuff into operation.

And I mean hurrying; he visited Bush what, a week after the election? That's the earliest any president-elect has ever done so. He gave his first quasi-"State of the Union" address just a few weeks ago, and last week he spoke to Congress; again, much earlier than ever before. He's only been in office a little over a month! He's pushing all this stuff.....it's weird. But I really do think that's why he's pushing so hard.

He knows what a target he is; plain and simple.

Reply #25 Top

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magical_negro

 

I keep seeing flash presentation showing all the presidents, and then obama, and then proud proclamations that "change has arrived". considering he is not the first democrat in office i can only imagine that the liberals are talking about his skin color, way to go racial profiling someone.