Rating criteria
My method is this....
0 to 3 points for Originality
0 to 3 points for
Appearance (look and feel some call it)
0 to 3 points for Useability
The
remaining 1 point is reserved for rare skins with the WOW! factor 
Forgot to mention that with the new 1 to 5 star ratings coming up, I'll have to adjust my method somehow.
[Message Edited]
Here's what I wrote many moons ago...
Skill level - up to 3 marks
Functionality - up to 3 marks
Appearence - up to 3 marks
With 1 further mark for something exceptional which has already gained 9 max from the other categories.
Almost identical to #3 
I too have yet to fit that into five stars... 
...or to get to that spelling mistake before Jafo does 
Appearance.... 
5 star ratings?.....
1 star......lowest 'quality' that warrants a rating.
3 stars...... average 'quality' competent but nothing special.
5 stars...... about as good as anything can get....you cannot imagine any way to improve it.
2 and 4 stars...... fit into the gaps as 'below average' and 'above average' respectively.
Personal prejudice/taste affects methodology.... unless you cna practise the idea of 'what would most people think of this' and let that also influence your personal taste/rating.
Most important thing is NOT to attempt to 'push' a rating in either direction by exaggerating it....eg you think 5 is not 'fair' that it should be a 7, so you rate it a '10'.
If you think for ANY criteria that it should be a '7' then rate it a '7'.
One reason for switching to 'stars' [and loaded rating ability matched to user level] is to disempower the 'drive-by' rating idiot who posts a '1' because he doesn't like purple or a '10' because the person is a mate.
Welcome Guest! Please take the time to register with us.