Harriet Miers Choice shows the Common Sense of President.

Another peace making move By George Bush

from JoeUser Forums
In another reaching out to the never satisfied left wing, President Bush once again shows his greatness by choosing a candidate that will be satisfactory to the lunatic fringe and the center of the Republican party.

By choosing Miers, President Bush is hoping to heal some wounds in America and American politics.

Once again President Bush shows his willingness to compromise, a trait that has thus far eluded the left wing.


http://www.americanpresident.org/action/orgchart/administration_units/officeofthechiefofstaff/deputychiefofstaffforpolicy/harrietmiers/a_index.shtml

By linking the above link you will see impeccable credentials, a long distinguished career, not only in private practice but experience in the internals of the American government.

Will anyone from the left be satisfied with this choice? Only time will tell. Somehow I think not ,as the left is never satisfied nor willing to understand how great George Bush truly is.
8,353 views 25 replies
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
"Left Satisfied" - Another oxymoron.
Offworld Trading Company
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Monday, October 03, 2005"Left Satisfied" - Another oxymoron.


harry reid himself said that Miers would be a just dandy choice and acceptable to the left. now we shall see if the left agrees. I am
betting they do not agree.

Bush should have went with a super conservative to set the tone for the next 20 years.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
Common sense of the President? It shows the continuing idiocy of the so called "conservatives" that blindly support Bush in that the left cannot be placated. STOP TRYING. You guys think you are outmaneuvering the left when you support things like this. All you accomplish is moving "conservatism" further to the left. You're being hoodwinked. And even worse, you think you're doing it to them.
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: GP(Anonymous User)Posted: Monday, October 03, 2005Common sense of the President? It shows the continuing idiocy of the so called "conservatives" that blindly support Bush in that the left cannot be placated. STOP TRYING. You guys think you are outmaneuvering the left when you support things like this. All you accomplish is moving "conservatism" further to the left. You're being hoodwinked. And even worse, you think you're doing it to them.


first I am not a conservative, but a moderate republican {notice the name?} I think it's high time we put aside partisan crap and go for the best candidate.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
Heh, she shore ez purdier than that thar Ginsburg lady......
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
6 by Dynosoar
Monday, October 03, 2005


Heh, she shore ez purdier than that thar Ginsburg lady......


shit you and I are more purdy than dat ol skank. heh
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
In another reaching out to the never satisfied left wing, President Bush once again shows his greatness by choosing a candidate that will be satisfactory to the lunatic fringe and the center of the Republican party.

By choosing Miers, President Bush is hoping to heal some wounds in America and American politics.

Once again President Bush shows his willingness to compromise, a trait that has thus far eluded the left wing


A compromise is when both sides come to an agreement by foregoing some of their own desires. Acquiescence is when one side gives in and the other side does not reciprocate. You yourself state that the left is never satisfied. So how is Bush showing greatness by being "willing to compromise" as you say? That's a sign of stupidity, not greatness.

first I am not a conservative, but a moderate republican {notice the name?}


Yes, I also noticed an article you wrote on the side menu that says "Starve a LIBERAL instead of Terry Schiavo." The "Moderate" is slightly transparent. There's nothing wrong with being conservative. Claiming to be moderate won't win you converts on the left.

I think it's high time we put aside partisan crap and go for the best candidate.


The partisan crap nowadays stems from which liberal infighting. The liberal Democratic Party seek race destructively towards the left, while the G.O.P. prefers to take their time going there.
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
I forgot to mention that other "moderate," the hammer and sickle wielding Myrrander.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
#8 by GP (Anonymous user)
Monday, October 03, 2005


In another reaching out to the never satisfied left wing, President Bush once again shows his greatness by choosing a candidate that will be satisfactory to the lunatic fringe and the center of the Republican party.

By choosing Miers, President Bush is hoping to heal some wounds in America and American politics.

Once again President Bush shows his willingness to compromise, a trait that has thus far eluded the left wing


A compromise is when both sides come to an agreement by foregoing some of their own desires. Acquiescence is when one side gives in and the other side does not reciprocate. You yourself state that the left is never satisfied. So how is Bush showing greatness by being "willing to compromise" as you say? That's a sign of stupidity, not greatness.


I say imo that reaching out to mend fences is a good thing, and shows that bush indeed in a uniter not a divider.

Yes, I also noticed an article you wrote on the side menu that says "Starve a LIBERAL instead of Terry Schiavo." The "Moderate" is slightly transparent. There's nothing wrong with being conservative. Claiming to be moderate won't win you converts on the left.


ah yes my most inflamatory article, damn good one too, I do not like liberals and can care less what they thgink about me.

STARVE A LIBERAL FOR A BETTER AMERICA!
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
9 by GP (Anonymous user)
Monday, October 03, 2005


forgot to mention that other "moderate," the hammer and sickle wielding Myrrander.


myrrander is a moderate ... a moderate godless Nazi with delusions of grandeur.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top

I forgot to mention that other "moderate," the hammer and sickle wielding Myrrander.

That is just a communist lie.  He is anything but.

Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
12 by Dr. Guy
Monday, October 03, 2005


forgot to mention that other "moderate," the hammer and sickle wielding Myrrander.

That is just a communist lie. He is anything but.


damn insulting doc, lumping me and that, that commie together in the same thought.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top

damn insulting doc, lumping me and that, that commie together in the same thought.

I did not.  I quoted the other 'one'.  Which while you do have moderate tendacies (as you show here), he has none.

Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
14 by Dr. Guy
Monday, October 03, 2005


damn insulting doc, lumping me and that, that commie together in the same thought.

I did not. I quoted the other 'one'. Which while you do have moderate tendacies (as you show here), he has none.


I met was insulting of "him/her/it? to lump me and myrrander together, not you. silly man I know you would never insult me.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
I met was insulting of "him/her/it? to lump me and myrrander together, not you. silly man I know you would never insult me.


Ok, I think????

If I ever lump you together with the eternal hermaphrodite, shoot me!
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Monday, October 03, 2005I met was insulting of "him/her/it? to lump me and myrrander together, not you. silly man I know you would never insult me.Ok, I think????If I ever lump you together with the eternal hermaphrodite, shoot me!


no shooting, will gently and lovingly correct as as befitting a friend.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top

no shooting, will gently and lovingly correct as as befitting a friend.

Thank you and good night my friend.  And to all my friends on JU.  Even the ones I am in disagreement with tonight.

Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
18 by Dr. Guy
Monday, October 03, 2005


no shooting, will gently and lovingly correct as as befitting a friend.

Thank you and good night my friend. And to all my friends on JU. Even the ones I am in disagreement with tonight.


may angels guard your sleep, good night.
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
You champion "moderation" as if it is absolutely virtuous. It isn't. Moderation is relatively virtuous, insofar as a relates to a particular issue. Are you moderately anti-terrorist? Moderately anti-pedophilia? Moderately anti-murder?

Using a label to describe yourself as moderate isn't going to win you anything, especially when it concerns an effort to appeal to the left. People aren't stupid. All they have to do is know where you stand on something. They'll be able to determine for themselves whether you are a moderate. Show them the destructiveness of liberalism and the left-wingers. That's how you appeal to a liberal. You won't convince an left-wing ideologue, but you won't have to.
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
#20 by GP (Anonymous user)
Tuesday, October 04, 2005


You champion "moderation" as if it is absolutely virtuous.


no I do not champion moderation, I am moderate, I do not push my views on others and think both lunatic fringes are nuts. I can care less if I appeal to the left, the only thing I want from them is to stop the partisan crap{the right too} and work together to rebuild america.
Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
no I do not champion moderation, I am moderate, I do not push my views on others and think both lunatic fringes are nuts. I can care less if I appeal to the left, the only thing I want from them is to stop the partisan crap{the right too} and work together to rebuild america.


How do you "rebuild America" when one party's platform includes multiculturalism, socialism, and anti-American self-loathing? I'm interested in how you feel this could be accomplished through cooperation.
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
#22 by Good Point
Tuesday, October 04, 2005


How do you "rebuild America" when one party's platform includes multiculturalism, socialism, and anti-American self-loathing? I'm interested in how you feel this could be accomplished through cooperation.


this is a terrifc question, I do not have an answer for. If I did I would put one out there, do you have a solution? I would be very intrested in hearing one.
Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
Great Article MM!

While I don't think Prs. Bush gains anything by reaching out to the left, I really don't see him doing so here.

Many conservatives were looking forward to a far right nominee. Well, if he had have found the far right's answer to Justice Ruth "Buzzie" Ginsberg, how many Republican Senators would he have been able to count on to back him? While the Senate Democrats are willing to walk in lockstep and show no ability to represent their states over their party, many Senate Republicans have proven that they can think for themselves.

What kind of slam would it have been for the Republicans in general if Prs. Bush had have gone for the fight... but because he doesn't hold all the Senate Republicns in his pocket... ended up with egg on his face?

Does the far right want a nominee who won't legislate from the bench? Or merely someone who will legislate from the "right" of the bench?
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Tuesday, October 04, 2005Great Article MM!


Does the far right want a nominee who won't legislate from the bench? Or merely someone who will legislate from the "right" of the bench?


first thanx ted, high praise indeed.

second the loons on the far right want more than anything to get abortion overturned, and while I abhor abortion I defend a womans right to choose even if I disagree with their choice.