Sean Conners aka SConn1
Listen, lil boy, I respond to and converse with scores of people here on a daily basis--sometimes repeatedly. My occasional remark towards (or to, or about) you hardly constitutes an 'obsession.' At least, not in anyone's mind but your own. Your narcissism knows no bounds. And, as most of the 'Sistahood' knows, a man's ego is inversely related to his penis size. Could I interest you in a microscope? yes, it is so flattering...obsessed
"Not with my tax dollars!!!" is a common cry amongst Americans whenever our government is found to be funding things we don't like. And of course, we see polls on a regular basis that try to tell us how we feel on any given issue. Then every 10 years our government takes a census report and gathers the information with all the speed and dexterity of aincient Rome. <BR
some thoughts on my predicted ending... kevin finnerty will play in...but not how i thought previous....check this out... last episode. chris, paulie, bobby, silvio are all dead. by then, uncle jun might be dead too...i'm thinkin suicide. but that's another thing...anyway...tony's "capo's are pretty much all history. the fbi are hot on the trail of the terror suspects...tony helps them with the war on terror, becomes a hero, but n
and another story might be how none of the measures passed by pelosi & co. in the 1st 100 hours have advanced any further. notthat any of that has reached a crisis or anything,,,it's only been a few months...but they do need to be held accountable and show us their "plan" for the future.
a republican would have gotten the same treatment, especially from the media now the lack of media coverage is another issue. it should have been better reported. but as far as his actual sentencing goes...just another rich man gettin away with it. some go to rehab, some get a slap on the wrist, and others get let go and write books that are nothing more than thinly veiled confessions. but it's not a republican v democrat thing to me.
when we get the justice dept back to being an independent office where justice is blind instead of an extension of any agenda's might...then i'll worry about sandy berger enhancing his crotch with classified documents. no, i made my point. as illustrated above. agree or disagree. that's your perrogative. but frankly, this is a small potato issue to me. to dan quayle, it would be a small potatoe issue, lol. but the continued obsession is flatter
let's not forget korea, indonesia, the phillipines, darfur and other parts of africa...notto mention columbia and other latin american nations going thru civil "wars" or strifes...then there is the assault on our borders from illegal aliens pouring thru from both sides (we don't talk much much about the canadian border cause more educated "valuable" members of society come thru there. usually with visas, that later expire and they don't leave.) we have wars on drugs, poverty, mental ill
This question was recently asked by a popular television commentator. It's not the 1st time i heard the question. But , for some reason, it has stuck in my head for a couple of weeks now. It is a given that the abortion debate divides people about 1/2 and 1/2 in this country. One half wants to outlaw abortion or severely restrict it to only life threatening
ok, who's gonna write the "soros is the anti-christ" article? lula? kfc? bueller? anyone? lol the paranoia here is quite funny. everytime i check back here his "evilness" grows and grows. maybe next time i check back, some neocon will have "proven" how soros is the cause for cancer, started the chicago fires and was the mastermind behind 9/11 all along.
You can't honestly say that you care more about the greater good than your own self preservation. If that were actually true you'd be handing over your entire check to the government. don't tell me how i think or what i would or have done. If there was a situation where the only outcome was me or you, there is no way you'd stand around waiting for someone to rush in with a way for both of us to walk away. You'd
I can find just as many that say the exact opposite. You do realize of course that the Washington Post is one of the most self-proclaimed leftist papers in the US? blah, blah, blah...the ol "liberal media" cry. show me where they "self-proclaimed" their liberalness.
i would imagine it depends on the composer of the music and who holds the rights to that. if stardock created it internally, like in a "work for hire" scenario, than it would indeed be legal since stardock does not enforce copyrights. but if stardock bought limited rights to the music, ther might be other issues at play. this actually has me curious, i think i'm going to consult the P.R.O. that i use and hold membership in, ASCAP for an answer
but when you look at all of their tables the numbers tell us that the iraqi people, that would be the non government part, think things are improving. yes some think things are worse. but more think it is better today than with saddam. that means we are winning in iraq. wrong...they want us out... WWW Link
I didn't chop any statement. this is the statement i made... the industry cries that they need looser regulation to build refineries. they are simply "holding out for a better deal while the american people are held hostage. you chopped it down to this... they are simply "holding out for a better deal" pretty damn clear as far as i can tell. I am no apologist for it.
The Sopranos, America's favorite family of criminals, will be coming to a close next month. Currently, there are 2 episodes remaining, the 1st of which is scheduled to air June 3rd. Most of the attention on the show is of course, about the crime. About the "whackings" that come nearly every week, and have been a staple in this final season. About who got "
In turn, Bush wants to keep this shitstorm going so that someone else can clean up his mess when the Democrat gets elected in 2008 he stated that 2 years ago (aprox) ...ya'll didn't believe him? only the people of this nation can bring our troops, who have served so honorably, home to defend our nation. the president has no desire to do it and the congress, despite their claims last fall, obviously don't have the guts to what is necessary.
i was being sarcastic ok, i'll bite,,,how so?
sean? you really are a DEMOCRATIC/LIBERAL LOON APOLIGIST. you prove it more and more each day. excuse me? i merely suggested an alternative motive. that doesn't make me an apologist, it makes me someone who considers other possiblilities. i'm really shaking my head wondering where the suggestion of any other possibilities than "he's just lookin to make a buck" considering soros's activism could be so offensive. you don't have to accept that, b
did it ever occur to ya that maybe soros wants to be able to get to the company from the inside? either reform it or expose it... i'm not sayin he's right or wrong to do that, but it is more plausible than what you have suggested. just my 2 cents...
and what is that subject how badly the repubilcans lie and the democrats don't the subject is swift boat leader john oneill and who he gives to and supports. and now you are telling me i can not write what i think that makes you a thought police and a democrat i am just asking what every other blog site on here requests. that you stick to the subject and not throw mud. i am not telling you what to
The link of course is from the EPA! the george bush / dick cheney EPA...lmfao!!!! i wasn't going to make that obvious point. but since you insisted. i figured people were less familiar with wing-nuts like adrian moore. And btw....you can blacklist me all you want. But I can "still" do an end-run on you in a heart beat. maybe you are the last person to know this...and that in itself is kinda fun
So what is wrong with that? the second part of the statement you chopped... while the american people are held hostage. maybe that's ok with you, since you work in the industry and are an obvious apologist for it. but for the rest of us, it might be another isuue.
As for Romney and the "swifties" lets see what they do before we start condemning them. he took their money months ago. and doesn't appear to be giving it back. I have yet to see one of their statements about Kerry or his tenure with Swiftboats called a lie guess ya didn't look very hard... On Crossfire, O'Neill claimed that there "are more than 60 people that served with John Kerry that contri
which Murtha did not dispute very vague statement. he didn't confirm it either. his office did issue a statement tho... "The committee and staff give every Democrat and Republican the same consideration. We have extensive hearings and every request is given careful consideration. We will continue to do just that." Rogers claim Murthat said things so loud "others could hear" yet no one has confirmed what Rogers is accusing Murtha