it's just something you don't understand. You don't even understand your own incoherent ramblings. Learn to read in context, and learn that you can't even begin to fathom what I do or do not know based on a single, random blog entry. whatever pal...you call it a cancer, i disagree...so you attack me like a lil brat? have a nice
Sean Conners aka SConn1
btw fraudman...ya can't call me a stalker then come over to my blog and particiate...but don't worry, i don't censor like you.
and btw IDIOT,,,calling me a stalker when you have to go back to before our last exchange to somehow "prove it" is pretty lame. if you felt that way,,,why continue? and i am not the one using a fake name and going around trying to bully people...that would be you. too bad you failed. but that doesn't make me a stalker, it makes you a failure. have a nice day:)
ok...now ya censor my message...ya probably shouldn't have used the "idiot" quote tho,,,considering it was from the message you censored. but here's the best part...less than 3 hours later,,,you show up replying to my blog. it's just to slander an honorable veteran of war of course, lol observe... here... ModeratemanOctober 17, 2006 16:48:38[/B] my blog...([B]Citizen)ModeratemanOctober 17, 2006 19:10:03 you are a joke! censor this too...<br/
What's done is done, although we are in dire need of election reform. i agree. i am not sure what the solution is there, but a system that eliminates about 98% of the population from running for office inherently because of economics is just not right in my view. mccain /feingold was a valiant effort, but parts of it were a flop and at least need to be re-examined. it ws a decent 1st effort, but the flawed bill was not the pan
Jack Murtha is a disgrace to the U.S.M.C. period. i know plenty of marines, including both vets and current ones,,,i have yet to meet one who shares your view. but you are entitled to your opinion.
Only the most rabid Bush haters still say he was "selected not Elected that's your opinion...i do have a great policy difference with the administration. but i think george is a sincere christian and a decent man. i think the charges of racism that have been charged at him are ridiculous. if there is anyone in the whitehouse i resent at all, it's dick cheney. i can't prove it, but cheney is an unethical man in my view. as far
There is just something about MySpace that attracts the ultra-attention whoring types. Teenagers, and not even teenagers, post all about their sexual conquests on MySpace, post ridiculous photos of themselves, and it really seems like a dangerous site for youth. Something about it just screams "sexual predator playground". There is an intangible about it that just p
Alot of panic seems to have set in with the GOP. The balance of power is threatening to actually have some balance, and some are scared. Should they be? Well, if they are folk who are only interested in power and feel the only way to get their ideas across is to basically "fix" the vote, then yes. But I don't think most GOP members, at least the ones I know, feel tha
correct I should have called him a killer instead. the terms are synonomous, so what? if you are making some kind of distinction...you failed to even mention what that was. but it does remind me of dick cheney's words... "They will offer more lectures, and legalisms, and carefully worded denials" which is all you are doing at this point...and have been doing for quite a while now.
i'm sorry,,,where was i in error here? let's review (again)... you called ted a "murderer" on several occasions. you asked the question,,,is ted a murderer? i said i didn't know, but what i do know is that no charges were even filed. many on the right expressed similair sentiments. they didn't know either. you reverse your position (flip flop!) and claim you don't know either. you then attack me even tho i have the same position as the one y
i am familiar with the churchhill quote,,,and yes, it is my real name...i don't see why you doubt that so much... but apparantly you take that quote to heart. i was a republican at 20 and a libertarian at 30...really didn't have a lot to do with the tight lil "left vs right" frame you try to rope everyone into. i just got sick of both parties. it might surprise you, but i was a lot more liberal in the 80's as a republican..
wow, where does it say I called your sainted mom a whore? I said I just might be your daddy and you extrapulate that into your momma being a whore. FOR SHAME!! CALLING your momma a whore. when you said you might be my daddy...i know who my daddy is...i come from a very stabel 2 parent household...can't even stand behind your own insults and
quack? rolf! what other manly terms can you come up with? BOY? plenty...but the only thing i notice that actually matters above is your inability to admit how wrong you were there....try being a man for a change dr nonsense. or do you prefer just continuing to dig your hole...maybe it will end up in china!
reduced to crying, I am sorry did not mean to make little sean cry. excuse me? puHLEAASSeeeee! that man in the mirror is you fraudman. keep tryin cunt...
No wonder they don't get elected. You need a plan to present to voters of why they should vote for your party. Just hating Bush is not a strategy, they should have learned that back in '04. actually, they seem to have learned from the 94 republicans. that class ran on jim wright and other scandals...it ws only after the election that the "contract with america" was rolled out to the masses....after they could do something about it. but the 94 campaign was run on the sc
Lets start with that the ad has "NOTHING" to do with China! It "does" have everything to do with N. Korea! And sorry to inform you, the video is not a lie, but exactly what Island Dog said it was. It boots nothing to appease tin-horn dictators. you are getting dumber by the minute , aren't ya quack? i don't believe i said the ad had any
[ BAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! i was referring to ted,,,as that is what this post is all about. damn you are seein red...lol btw,,,so was fraudman,,,let's review.... he posts... you respond with a list of republicans doing more wrong without a word about the two murderers I put here, what is more wrong a single murder or a whole b
but getting back to the point you were trying to make....that ted kennedy is a murderer, as you contended in 2 different threads before doing your 180 spin...guess that debate has been settled huh? and ya can't even acknowledge that ya attacked me for having the same view as your right wing cronies. so you reduce yourself to insulting everyone, including my mother...for shame fraudman.
I am old enough to be your daddy, and who know I just might be. BOY and callin my mother a whore? you weak and feeble little pussy. you should be ashamed of yourself. how does it feel to be a cunt? words only a wuss under an alias would say.
how does me " laughing my fucking ass off and rolling on the floor" make me a child? nonsense! keep tryin fraudman...
keep melting fraudman....keep calling my pushin 40 ass "a child" keep showing what a moron you are keep graspin at those straws...this is fun:) I been dishing it out and taking it much longer than you been alive child. I have never needed help fighting BOY, and surely do not need it now, you might reconsider who you pick fights with. Ho
ONLY Democrats smoke marijuana! lol....yeah,,,that's why when i dealt in "contraband" most of my clients were republicans. the difference between republicans and democrats on this is disclosure, not practices. kinda like a current scandal....hmmmm
I asked what is the policy of the democrats as a whole. That is the problem with the democrats as they have no strategy as a party. i really don't see that as necessary. the dems have no means in which to implement any strategy. they can't even get a bill on the floor on anything. i agree with their methods of discussing the issue, debating the issue, and if they get into a position where they can do something about it...only then sh
thanks def...when i get some time, i want to look at some more of the rhetoric that was flying around then. i'm only scratching the surface so far, but the parallels are just jumping out...no wonder the right was so adamant against anyone comparing this to vietnam, except when it came to lying about john kerry.