la riva,,,tell me how you would defend yourself if someone decided you were an enemy combatant.
Sean Conners aka SConn1
It can be very frustrating to view some JU dialogue, sometimes even more so being a part of it. I understand your point, but at work is an exercise that is quite beneficial even if some don't change their mind even a little bit. 1. A Joeuser is allowed to speak one's mind on issues in a public syndicated forum granting them relief. 2. Other Joeusers get their cha
Elvis died clean and sober. He finally wised up and started back on the right track, but too late. His lifestyle was, in point of fact, what led to his demise. It was a heart attack brought on by overeating and the effects of his drug abuse and addiction, and perhaps even the strenuous diet and exercise regimen he was using to lose weight and get back in shape. </tr
California GOP heads are urging candidate Tan D. Nguyen, a Vietnamese immigrant trying to unseat a popular Democratic incumbent. Nguyen, who allegedly had direct knowledge of a racist, threating letter targeted at hispanic voters in California. Over 14,000 letters were sent out telling them they might be arrested and deported if they even tried to vote. Nguyen denies
Reminds me of the "Buy American or die" ethic when it came to automobile purchases in the late 70's and early 80's. Ignore the automakers disregard for you as the consumer and buy it anyways excellent observation! i remember that. the japanese went from being a joke in our minds to being the mark of quality, durability and efficiency.
still waitin on mm and ted to tell us how they would defend themselves if it was declared that they were an enemy combatant.
What didn't you understand? dude, that was sarcasm. do you suffer from memory loss? i'vfe been verbally kicking the crap out of you for some time now. as far as you saying they weren't "name calling... In my opinion, only extreme ignorance in relation to the checks, balances, and remedies afforded by the Constitution, and an almost hysterical distrust of, and antipathy towards, the American system of government. <
There was no name calling here. If you think that's name calling then I wouldn't start anything with me. Because I "really" get into it. huh?
Not bragging, complaining my bad, guess i misread
None of them state that we have been nice to Libya. All have shown how Sanctions and isolation are what has worked. i never said we were just nice to libya. don't see anything in the review about scores of pages relating
In my opinion, only extreme ignorance in relation to the checks, balances, and remedies afforded by the Constitution, and an almost hysterical distrust of, and antipathy towards, the American system of government. again, it all boils down to name calling. fact is that abuses of this are not at all far fetched and give license to any agant of the govt to set up anyone they choose to be an enemy combatant. if you disagree fine. but name calling is out of line. we don't e
I would take stuff like this a lot more seriously if the people who are complaining aren't people who are constantly looking for the sky to fall so they can run around warning people about it. lol,,,more of the name callin...next.
Please explain to me the difference between an enemy across the patomic then and terrorist cells in the US now? it's not about the guilty, it's about protection of the innocent. rmember innocent until proven guilty? it used to be the whole basis of our justice system. if you were arrested and declared an enemy combatant, how would you defend your
good article brad, and as an advocate of using one's own name, glad to see it. i think you are on point on your view speaking for people from your perspective. i don't think i would exactly brag about the gop's work on healthcare, but outside of that, kudos.
We should NOT be granting enemies that are not American born, the same rights that are ours. we probably aren't far off there. but this bill includes american citizens as well. imagine you were back in the military mm...and someone, for whatever reason, be it a good one or a malicious one, decides that they are going to ruin you. and their clout and position in life or the military is such that they can. imagine they get manufactured "evidence" that is enough to get you
Then please show me the facts Ron Suskind's "One Percent Doctrine" is sitting in front of me. it literally has scores of pages about that. sorry, i can't type em all out for ya,,,you'll have to buy the book or show me something that contradicts me at least. suskind states that the program to get his regime to disarm began in 92 after the lockerbie crash. there was a bunch of progress in 98, then, in 2002, they got both the lockerbie stuff settled, and the disarmerment n
did an article comparing Bush to Lincoln and you'd be surprised how similar the dissent now sounds like the dissent regarding Lincoln's 'careless' war... link me to that...interested in reading it man...really.
I think equating the two is stretching things quite a bit, i'm not so sure,,,that's why i'm askin questions. i don't think they are direct parallels by any means, but doesn't the similarities warrant looking back and perhaps not repeating our mistakes? <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Ta
was hoping to have enuff time yesterday to write about this. sadly i didn't and i'm running really late even as i type. hey man,,,when ya get a shot,,,as long as it's goin on, please do write on the subject. i'd like to hear your thoughts. it's important and shouldn't go away <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF39
you are certainly entitled to you r opinion.
SALUTE to moderateman for his brave service to our country!
This week, President Bush signed the War Commissions Act. The GOP, in an attempt to reframe the election debates once again, heralded the signing as another nail in the coffin to democrats more so than any terrorist at home or abroad. Funny, I thought that the war was against terrorists, not democrats. Dennis Hastert, amongst others, desperate to ho
i'm mortified by your backhanded suggestion something as serious as a barely credible threat of a possible terrorist attack on multiple nfl temples scheduled for 'soon' might possibly be used to gain political leverage. if that were the case, why hasn't homeland security elevated threat levels all along rather than just this one since about this time in 2004?
It does remind me of the situation in Oklahoma City last year. Stadium Security turned a man away from a few gates because he didn't have a ticket. He did, however, have a bookbag. The police later arrested him while he sat at a bus stop... it was full of explosives. wow,,,i must admit i know nothing of this story,,,any chance you could do an
You can tell it is a fake. They mention Oakland. Why bomb an empty stadium? kudos! very funny!