And on my latest you did as well. I was not talking about lawyers (mentioning them in passing, yes), yet you chose to concentrate on that non sequitar. Instead of the main point i would have responded guy,,,except i can't. so i guess i'll have to here. you were right there as far as hiring lawyers not being the main point. i guess i read it a lil differently the first time. i did want to point out that the practice was done on
Sean Conners aka SConn1
you can dish it out but can't take it" is also the cry of the nut who can't face the fact that his argument is insipid and insists on posting it over and over. it's also a statement of fact here. i do not post things "over and over"...on that thread, you can see an "annonymous user" post under my name being used. i got power surged at home and the sudden shut off signed me out. i accidentally double clicked the response, then apologize
your argument is not germaine ted. my article is merely recognizing the fact that democrats were calling for similar "benchmarks" that the president endorsed today. but when democrats suggest anything, they are just called names. if you want to debate how every war in history has been fought, then that's another article. feel free to write it, and maybe i'll respond. last week you screamed at me that nancy pelosi's "priority" (and t
also, earlier in their piece, it discusses their plans being shared withthe iraqi's ... We also believe the Iraqi people must understand that the U.S. military will not stay in Iraq indefinitely; they must achieve the political stability necessary to defeat the insurgency. The Bush administration must provide information on its efforts to convince Iraq’s communities to make the necessary compromises for a political settleme
the republicans hire lawyers too. they got ready in advance in 2004 as well. as did the democrats. both sides hire lawyers in advance. sometimes they come from the national party fund, sometimes that money is funnelled to the state organizations to spend on lawyers. your point is moot. just because someone chose to write about 1 side doing it, it doesn't mean both don't actually do it in reality.
by the way,,,here's how the exchange happened...i'm only gonna copuy exerpts...if anyone wishes to fact check it to make sure i don't take anything out of context,,,feel free here... Link Reply By: Sean Conners, a.k.a. SConn1 Posted: Monday, October 23, 2006 this is a super-spun article. on just a little bit of "fact checking" i found this...As a home owner,
he contended (along with the punditry) that democrats including reed, whom he calls a "lying bit of rancid tallow" said that their benchmarks were timetables, that were fixed and not condition based. i certainly showed that not to be the case.
As for remaining anonymous Sean, I would not write under my own name because there are too many weirdos out there. i have been writing for almost 20 years. i have been writing online for over a decade. i have never had anyone successfully threaten me. it comes down to putting your name on your words. if you can't do that, then you, in most cases, have no right to make public statements. the whole "above the fray" thing amuses
The Benchmarks for Success. The Bush administration must also provide benchmarks by which their success can be measured. This includes the criteria by which to measure the progress being made and a schedule for meeting these conditions. A Plan for Bringing Our Troops Home. As it lays out a clear strategy with benchmarks, the Bush administration must also provide a campaign plan with estimated dates for the phased redeployment of our troops fr
in the interest of full disclosure, here's the rest of the words...reid, levin and durbin go into more detail about "benchmarks"... UNITED STATES POLICY ON IRAQ ACTGetting Answers to the American People on the War in Iraq – Mission NOT Accomplished For too long, the Bush administration has failed to lay out a clear strategy for success in Iraq to the American people. Their rosy statements about the progress of the war are not match
Today, George Bush, offered his focus-group vetted speech to the American people. It was, as predicted, just more rhetoric. Bush stated that they were setting up "benchmarks" for the Iraq goverment to achieve. he emphasized a big differnce between his "benchmarks" and his misrepresentation of the democratic position, which he calls a "fixed timetable." <
You see it in articles and replies all the time. To paraphrase, it usually boils down to this..." stop saying things i can't deal with, or i'll censor your words." It matters not how polite the person is. It doesn't matter if the person refrains from insults and profanity. All that matters is that the host of the article can't effectively argue something, therefore hi
jhj;h;h'hoh
I am reading the new Woodward Book. have ya read Ron Suskind's one percent doctrine? i reccomend it. also, anyone from any side of the proverbial political fence should read tom friedman's "the world is flat" it's not really a political book, more economics and such. it's a tough read, but reading it will show the world in a whole new light.
I did not misrepresent you. If you were mis-represented, it was by your own words. puHLEAAAsssee! whatever,,,have a nice day:)
Harold Ford is running ofr Senator in Tennesee. The culturally conservative democrat has ran, by modern standards, a pretty good campaign. The same can't be said for his republican opponent or his party. Bob Corker has allowed the RNC to run highly inflamatory racist ads in Tennesee. Corker claims to distance himself from the ads, which show white women sug
If you dont want to be called a duck, stop quacking like a duck. sorry, just cause i disagree with the administration and don't look at the political spectrum the same way as you do doesn't make me anything in reality...only in your mind. you are free to feel about me how you want, just don't tell me you are being polite when you are d
Happy Birthday and many more mason:)
Today, The Whitehouse decided that "stay the course" was no longer acceptable as a talking point. After years of demonizing anyone who even suggestied any changes in tactics, the administration wishes to paint itself as a flexible, nimble and ever changing force. Too little, too late. If someone suggested more troops, the administration said "no, we need to
Now I have been respectful of you and do agree with you at times true,,,and you can say the same the other way around as well. that's why i am spending a lil time directly responding to you instead of leaving it at the flip comment above. <TD c
guy, charles, et al,,,thanks for showing how little you understand just keep goin like you are goin...cheers:)
i can't believe no one else found this to be funny
col gene: I hope the Democrats win island dog: Of course you do, because you are a far left liberal. i don't know if he is or not, but i do know that eve
the Republican party is desperate to hold power. For months now, candidates have waged highly negative campaigns to try to stop any takeover by the democrats of either house fo congress. The rhetoric has reached a fever pitch as those ads have seemingly lost their effectiveness. Out of the ashes of those unsuccessful attacks, the portable punditry has unleashed their