my wife and i have these debates all the time. we've been married 11 years and together over 13. it seems everything she spends is ok. everything i spend is a waste. from reading your piece, it's apparant we're not alone, lol... it does sound like this was, at least from your perspective, a devistating purchase. can it be returned? if so, and if you can't pay your CC bill because of it, then do so. if it can't be returned, then what is done is
Sean Conners aka SConn1
i caught my 7 year old trying to bust my monitoring password. it wasn't too sophistcated of a scheme, and the site he was trying to get to wasn't a real bad one, but i came down on him pretty hard over just the idea of trying to beat a password. overall, my philosophy is like that of many companies. i own the computer, i own the subscriptions to get online. i own the house, pay for the electricity, etc, etc...the way i see it, i own everythin
You're kind of wrong. Especially since the klan as we know it today din't start until 1915! So my point stands no, because the quote i used came from a history of the klan, discussing it's origins, which were orig. in 1866. if ya wanna make the point that the skinheads have sim motivations for their hate, fine, i agree with you there. but i was t
With translations over time, variations crept in, but not so major as to hinder us from getting the important and substantial meaning of doctrinal matter. well, there is no consensus here for people who call themselves believers. some believe in literal translations, others more profound ones. some take the text as a whole, some pick out certain
For us believers who said i didn't believe in God? i don't put my faith in fallible men tho. and i am very familiar with the history you refer to, that's the catholic church's version. but it's hardly the only version. but i didn't come here to get into a religious pissing contest. furthermore, no minds are gonna be changed here. you bu
Another religious moron. i wasn't implying that at all,,,we all typo a headline from time to time. i was just trying to help.
But in the 60's they were still democrats and "still" doing all sort of ugly things. in the 50's and 60's they were dixiecrats, and eventually joined republicans Your incorrect here also. The "skinheads" which are the angry young white guys you talk about, didn't start till the 80's and 90's. no, in 1866, after the civil war ended. i am absolutely correct here. btw, if there is anyone in maryland here,
Don't even "suggest" this kind of thing in Alabama. That will "still" get you tarred and feathered. And just about any other deep south state. that was my point. thank you doc:) The clan, founded by Democrats and for most of its history made up almost entirely of Democrats. That clan? comparing post civil war democrats to today is kinda silly. everyone knows the party transformed in the late 50's and early 60's
everything is back to normal seemingly. thanks brad:) now if we can just get a lil balance on the front page....lol thought maybe my "democrats called for benchmarks a year ago..." would have been a nice addition...
whatever ya did,,,it seems to have worked...thank you:)
brad,,,just caught your last response. and yes, you have every right to black list me for whatever reason you choose. i stated that, and even underlined it earlier. my biggest problem actually, was and is not being able to respond in the forums, as they are much easier to quote with and such...but i'm not tellin ya anything you don't know. if it is a bug, any idea how to fix it? and yeah, response 20 is longwinded and not my best
Noise" is something that hamstrings the debate. It becomes confused, people don't like having to follow it in multiple, needless directions, so they move on. You usually end up with the Col and his foils in the same damned boring conversations we've read a million times. and baker, ya'll send plenty of "noise" my way. there have been many times that ya'll focus on how i phrased 1 sentence in a multi paragraph article. or nitipicked
Example: I write an article asking people to think of government policies that affect them in the real world. I explicitly mention that things such as the NIA wiretapping or other things should not be listed unless you actually know someone who has been affected. And what do you do? You immediately go into a rant about those very policies without even addressing the point of the article . i may be repeating myself,,,but i feel i need t
hey brad...i was thinking about this site , with the upcoming elections, should maybe set up a lil debate on some of the big issues. not a flame fest, but maybe a format where a question is presented, and a few people , chosen in advance, could just give a single, say max 500 word response to the question. then readers could judge for themselves. no traps, no badgering, no flaming or tangenting.
Your responses appear poorly thought out, and I don't mean to hurt your feelings but give the appearance of being a sub-par intellect. Maybe you're a really smart guy in the real world but you don't seem to be able to convey your intelligence into conherent responses. If I didn't know better, I would think you were in your early teens. I am not trying to insult you, but that is how your writing comes across the fact is brad, i get
The Klan raped Black women, lynched Black men, and terrorized Black communities. Propaganda was spread that all Black men were potential rapists, all white women potential victims. The results and legacy of such hatred were vicious. Thousands of Black men were lynched between Emancipation and World War II, with the false charge of rape a common accusation. The rape of a Black woman was not even considered a crime, Rape laws made rape a capital of
Re: the white woman thing, why would they? When was the last time you heard anyone in the MSM or anywhere else rail against a black man and a white woman being linked romantically in a racist way? Hmm? When? cmon baker,,,you know as well as i that white women / black men are a taboo in many places and circles. and it's not the liberal ones. acting like no one ever questions those relationships is a bit disingenuous. people are smart eno
i looked at this article and the responses. if i understand the debate right , kfc contends that the word of God is infallable in the 'orig texts" is that right? if so, i need to point out that the "orig" texts" are not , in many cases, origional at all. many of them are interpretations and word of mouth ones at that of stories passed down. so therefore, are subject to the same infallabilities as any modern day translations are.
Actually, I think that all the hubbub from Dem drones is patently racist. What they are saying is that if you are going to pose a woman in an attack ad for a black candidate, she'd better be black. Can't have any of this mixing of races. Who are the ones being racist again? it was not only that she was white, she was naked, at least that was the impression delivered (tell me if you see any clothing on her) if you don't think th
Brad has been blogging & posting under his own name since day one - much as you'd apparently like to attribute that to Rush, Sean, 'tain't so. i've been on this blog site for just under 3 years. back then, he did use his own name more often than not. but for some time now, he has used the draginol account the vast majority of the time. brad himself acknowledged this... I use a handle on-line. Draginol. I probably s
The problem with the crap the col leaves is it draws flies. He comes onto your blog about the President's choice of suits, leaves a big steamer about how the economy is falling apart. That in and of itself isn't going to wreck your discussion, but when 10 naysayers start tearing into him, and then he replies, and they reply... that's fine baker, and i understand other people do things differently than i do. i don't censor at all because
me thinks me smells a rat apparantly i can't resspond on many joeuser.com posts, i can reply to nothing in the forums. i don't know the logistics of it, but i can tell ya, like michael j fox, i'm not faking anything. i did attempt (twice) to respond to the artcile direcly, but all that happens is i get a screen with all the responses, but no "box" to put anything into.same result on many other posts. i did manage
just a tip...it "come to pass" not "past"
As for remaining anonymous Sean, I would not write under my own name because there are too many weirdos out there. just want to point out that now that rush limbaugh has suggested it, brad is now again using his real name. so do most other bloggers who don't want to come off as amateurish by using an aol type s/n. and please don't slander me and imply i'm some sort of "wierdo" just because i don't support the administration a