conservative,,,how can you assume that the testimony is conflicting if it is classified? if it is classified, you or anyone else hasn't talked about it. and if anyone claims they have and are talking about it,,,they are potentially breaking the law. funny how (neo)conservatives hold everyone else to this "criminal law" burden it won't even come close to when attacking. also funny how you mention nothing of Dr Rice's refusal to testify
Sean Conners aka SConn1
the reports from the Kerry camp suggested he was exhausted from the primary...he had pretty much been going non stop since the fall at least...this was the only lull he had since then...and from looking at his demeanor in his economic policy speech today (ya know, one of those speeches the attack dogs will deny the existence of when they cry kerry is just being negativce and everybody just hates bush and has no plans, blah, blah, blah...) it seemed to
Thank you for the insightful comments robert. i think you reflect the opinions of millions of americans
this article was long winded, oversimplistic and the author couldn't have been more guilty of straw man arguements for the other side...i won't go on and on here,,,but if you wish to read the other side of the coin,,,go here,,, Link
excellent article muggaz,,,a breath of fresh air...you make several excellent points.
thanks Dan,,,know anyone hiring writers? lol sean:)
i've read a few of the folks you list,,,and i agree, some good writers in that group...feel free to check out my blog, which is less than 2 weeks old here (and already controversial apparantly, lol)... Link
It was a chilly Sunday night in early March, 1985. Sam is setting up to play another "All-Ages" gig with his local hardcore band. They do their soundcheck, what has become a running joke to do a "pop" song in a punk way. Tonight's choice was a hardcorish rendition of Devo's "Whip It." The soundman does his final checks and makes a few notes before having the band tuck
it did seem that way jeb...Tenet is showing the desperation of a used car salesman at this point...and Armitage yesterday looked like a deer in headlights 1/2 the time.
i agree sherye, thanks:)
Today, after much fanfare, Richard Clarke testified before the 9/11 Commission. Throughout this week, there has been much coverage concerning his testimony after an explosive 60 Minutes interview and the release of his book on the subjects surrounding the war on terror. Some questioned his integrity and tried to discredit his 30 years of service, thru 4 administratio
the family that can blaze together, stays together trinitie? i gotta party with yer clan, lol...
thanks for the comments jeremy:)
actually, some of the finest weed around is grown in that neck of the woods...indoors, of course.
lol,,,my mistake,,,south dakota,,,sorry for the typo
thanks for the comments vern,,,i'm not sure i agree with you 100% but i think you make some valid arguements for your viewpoint. i too believe in educating our children properly that does not feature "the boogeyman" as a deterrence. after all, sooner or later, kids figure out that there is no such thing and like with george bush,,,we lose credibility instead of being a source of guidance or a standard of behavior.
that's really cool dharmagirl,,,for the 1st time in my life, i'm considering going to north dakota on vacation...usually i do vegas or some tropical island or beach in general,,,but this show was really well done and made me want to learn more.
Sunday night I sat down and put on my usual shows. Like millions of other Americans, that means an evening of my 2 favorite "S's." That would be the Simpsons and The Sopranos. As usual, both shows lived up to their entertaining legends, each in their own right. But at 10pm, HBO premiered what might be their best attempt at a series since the italians muscled in on our
thanks for the support cull...from the beginning, i contended 2 things and i am glad others picked up on it,,,i got some emails from folks who didn't want to go public because they feared the wrath.... the 2 main points i made in my disagreement with brad were that his position of being "board owner" and therefore having more "points" to judge others by is that he should have the decency to recuse himself from either granting or taking away po
pam,,,i went into the article explaining it wasn't without bias,,,i have identified myself in the article and in others as someone who will vote for kerry...the article was about moving on, and how regardless of what the commissions bring (and today's testimony and recent events lead towards bad news) that it is quite evident that bush has lost the confidence of enough people that change is the best option. bush touts his "strong and steady " leadershi
since i don't own a bong,,,,and the fact that brad has graced me back here, lol...more blogging shouldn't be more of a problem baker,,,take care:)
for the record, i'm 36,,,,good observation jeb, lol
Vote for Bush or i'll charge money for this site? Cmon! i know this site is right leaning but that is really cheap...oops,,,i'm sorry,,,i don't want to insult Brad and have him pull more "god mode" RPG tactics on me when he is responding to my posts.
it wasn't an attack on you,,,,but i can see how you reacted,,,,real mature, lol,,,,i won't comment on what ya did to my site as it is easy to see how fragile your ego is...but Brad,,it is pretty obvious why the sites on here are more right leaning than most blog sites....especially since i've now personally experienced your RPG "god mode" like wrath....and to think,,,i gave you an "insightful" tag on your response...i would tell you to grow up here bra