Now, if you want to be taken even partially seriously, you would instead list the causes of the situations you listed, and how they would be caused by who was in the whitehouse. So leadership and who in the white house don't matter? things happen for lots of reasons. the fact that who was in t
ThinkAloud
these were put in place to counter the minimum wage that started at the same time Ohh really? The Dem's and the supreme court didnt force that? Rosa Park didnt happen? and Brown Vs Dept of Education didn't happen? all of it was to counter Min. wage? of course it was ......
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 would never have passed without broad REPUBLICAN support. That's not theory; it's provable FACT. see how you are spinning the facts? of course to pass anything and avoid dead-lock in the Senate you always need support from the other party. and who was in office in 1
The economy has been growing at record levels, unemployment is very low, and even though energy prices are high, the economy has still absorbed the hit quite well You like the Dem to distort the facts as the GOP does? Since the economy is ok so the Dem should just ignore everything else? that is all that matters, the economy? You didnt hear anyone distorting the facts, just pointing the OTHER problems the country is fac
The Republicans aren't perfect but anyone with even a casual grasp of history can see that the Democrats, by far, have a long track record of being on the wrong side of history. your list is a haphazard collection of false information and fact-spinning. Dem's are responsible for Communism and a
If you focus your attack solely on Bush, that means Dems will sweep in with vote totals that will make them declare a "mandate" and the country will suffer for it. Comon Gid. Did i even mention Bush? you guys brought him up. i talked about a trend that included 3 other presidents. Doesnt that tell you
The real issue is LEADERSHIP (or the lack of it). We need a President who is able to chart a course that effectively deals with the major issues facing our country and is able to get Congress to enact laws that will accomplish those solutions. That has been lacking to some extent for a long time but especially during the past 7 y
Since it is apparent that you don't want to discuss here, but only engage in partisan attacks, Far from it, i will be glad to discuss any issue, but jumping to conclusions and personal attacks are not my style. I am not liberal in the first place, if that means anything to anyone. but i am also not c
Do you really expect George W. Bush to accompany MSHA inspectors personally on Air Force One? No Gid. But OSHA and MSHA have suffered a lot of personnel cuts (and policy directives to ease things out) and this undermines their effectiveness. that is the problem. Every time anyone says anything about t
Underground mining is a different world, and unless you've been there, you have no farking idea what you're talking about. you assume a lot. Don't you? i designed and managed major projects inside mines in Wyoming and Overseas Gid. you really dont know whom you talking to. just because i dont talk abo
You also left out the first WTC bombing, USS Cole attack, Kobar towers attacks, the miserable attempts at fighting terrorism in the 90's. First i am talking about misfortunes which happened at home not abroad. Second, i am talking about all kinds of misfortunes and not necessarily terror-related o
Who owned Congress during the years the democrat was in office? You still talking about the congress? the laws were there and they didn't change, congress has nothing to do with implementing existing laws. what is the matter with you? you are supposed to be smart, remember that? You cant blame
Because they're both responsible. Because they don't know how to run a country, only how to run for office. I partially agree. However, it is noticeable that major troubles happen when there is a GOP in the white house. may be it is just their bad luck. but it is very strange phenomenon. i can't attrib
I don't know the answer, but the article itself describes someone who is ignorant about how government works. It's not all about the executive. Typical smart/intelligent conservative's answer. when confronted with facts confuse the issue and start spinning things around. If you are smart enoug
I have been watching from the sidelines for a few weeks now. So many things are happening I can’t help but wonder what is going on. So much nonsense going on I can’t help but wonder where these people are living. In the same universe as the rest of the country? The more I watch and wonder and go back in time I can’t help but notice a very sad phenomenon. S
Making the process of islamisation as bloodless and democratic as possible will not only turn the new islamic states into less-antagonists figures, but will also favor the population, who will see the USA really acting to it's word, and not only when it favors it. A democractic change will also allow for a possible rebalance toward more secularism on the long run, because otherwise, the new islamic states may be authoritarian regimes (like Iran), where the clergy has e
Our Lord Jesus Christ was without sin, so He stood in no need for circumcision. But He submitted to the rite becasue, according to the prophecies, the Redeemer was to be a true Israelite and son of Abraham. To be such and to be recognized as such, circumcision was necessary. By His Incarnation, our Lord took upon Himself the sins of mankind, so as to make satisfaction for them. FOr this purpose, He shed His precious Blood for the first time in circumcision, and showed
It is Paul's writings that have created confusion not G-D's words to Jesus. AD, i dont think you understood what i said. God's ACTUAL words to Jesus got lost somehow, only the writings of Paul and the rest of them remain and these writings are confusing and misrepresent what God actually said to Jesus. Part of the problem is due to translation and the other part is due to misinterpretation of what jesus said.
Jews understand the difference between the Talmud (the written form of the Oral Law), Mishnah and Midrashim (Rabbinical Writings), Torah. You my friend may have them confused. I think this is the root of the problem from the start. It got confusing even more when God's actual words to Jesus got lost and only the writings of his followers partially survived. It is a shame but that is the way it is.
if you read what I've been writing you'd see I believe in BOTH election and freewill. Election is God chooses us to be in the family of God. Freewill is our response AFTER the election. We are free to love, honor and obey God just like we are free to love, honor and obey our parents after being born the first time. And the ones who were not elected don't have Freewill? Your example is flawed. ALL children ARE allowed (i.e. elected in your termin
you've already substantiated it by placing the wrongness or rightness of an event as being determined by the events that surround it Hey Ock, in your "Quantum Truth" you say this: because we can never see ALL of the events surrounding this event, we can never discover with absolute accuracy the "goodness" or "evilness" of this event without an accompanying arbitrary choice of a definition of "good". This arbitrary choice, as much as many p
Lot's steadfastness is worthy of our admiration. He lived for 20 years in the wicked city and did not let himself be led away in sin, but remained firm in what was right and brought up his children in the holy fear of God you say that and I agree. however, you ignore completely the rest: he was an alien
Even in the denomination I now attend most are freewillers and it drives me crazy because I know it's unbiblical He didn't create them flawed. It was their exercising of their freewill in disobedience that made them flawed.They had a choice to obey and keep sin out of the scenerio or disobey and let it in freewill is unbiblical ...... then "exercising of their freewill in disobedience that made them flawed." ????
Candidates who ignore their constituency are NOT candidates talking about the best interests of the people, TA. And it is arrogant and rude of you to think that those of us who didn't sign up with the Big Two aren't working to make things better. We're just not posting our achievements on campaign posters. Did i blame you for not agreeing with any of them? i know both are not exactly looking for the people's interests. But at least they are doing a littl
The same people who think abortion is the most evil thing on the planet have no problem condemning the poor who chose to carry their fetuses to term. I hate that about Liberals. They catch people making fools of themselves. Liberals are not supposed to be able to think or catch things like that. you are