I agree with all of the comments of "learning from our mistakes" and "making the system better", what I vehemently disagree with is whining and carping that this election was in some way "stolen" or the results are illegitimate or fraudulent. Can the system be made better? Yes. Should it be made better? Yes. Are people entitled to encourage change and improvement? You betcha! Would having touchscreen devices and/or some uniform ty
terpfan1980
The reason this isn't true: If it was, Mary Beth Cahill wouldn't have let Kerry concede.... ... James Carville... ... John Edwards... ... Joe Lockhart... ... CBS News/NYTimes... ... Terry McAuliffe... ... and a host of others that would have been screaming from the hilltops that Kerry had won Ohio. Keep dreaming, keep trying to delegitimize the mandate that Bush got. It just shows you to be a poor loser t
Here's a more left wing source for the same basic materials: MSNBC article from Newsweek The article referenced through MSNBC is actually much, much better, and far more detailed. Worth a read from anyone. The article actually lends some credence to those that suspect Kerry's campaign was done in from the inside by the "Clintonista" cro
The link is already there, click on the text: Diary Bombshell: Kerry Met With Terrorists in my original post. Granted the source is a known "right wing" news source, but the information is there. You might try searching for additional sources of the same information, but then again, Kerry and his friends have done a pretty good job of keeping information from being widely disseminated when it was detrimental to him. For example, that
Diary Bombshell: Kerry Met With Terrorists In a bombshell development that could have turned President Bush's victory into a landslide had it come out before the election, John Kerry wrote in his Vietnam War diary that he met with "terrorists" in Paris
Ultimate balloting system in Democratic dreamworld: BALLOT Democrat Democrat Democrat Democrat - no other choice. </font
Reply #10 By: CrispE - 11/8/2004 5:22:39 PM landen81: First, the right wants "links" to evidence. Then you give them some and they say they aren't legit and you should move to Canada or France. Hmmm... there is nothing like tolerance. .....and this is nothing like tolerance! Those links are n
I demand that these irregularities be accounted for ... and I demand that you get the hell out of my country. You know, "Dude, where's my country?", your's obviously isn't here. I believe it was moved to France, Canada, or Kofi Annan's U.N. Whining sniveling conspiracy theorist loser. <
Let me be the first to say: Krank and Troll ^^^ The line to get into Canada and/or France is that way -^ or that way -v or that way or....
Just wanted to take a few seconds and remind any and all citizens that are leaving the country because they can't stomach the fact the George W. Bush was reelected (that's right - RE-ELECTED, not re-selected, not selected, but re-elected, as in he won twice!!!) that they have one important piece of business to accomplish on the way out of town: RENOUNCE YOUR CITIZENSHIP. If folks want to leave the country, that's fine. Please feel free to fin
confused references, sorry, original materials removed.
I really wanted to just walk away from this freakin' troll, but I just can't do it. Dubz - I sincerely hope that Atty. General Ashcroft makes use of the patriot act to find your comments, then uses the comments that you've made as proof that you've made hate speech which the kings and queens of political correctness on the left have so diligently helped to outlaw and over-penalize in the wake of idiots beating up others who happen to be a mino
Or maybe that Redskins were ripped off by a Democratic referee / line judge that created a bogus call just to toss the game to the opposing side
Reply #6 By: Citizen InfoGeek - 11/3/2004 12:49:33 PM just hope bush 2.0 realizes how polarized the country truly is, and tries to move more to the middle. That's what I was thinking. Yes he won but 44 million people he governs do not like what he is doing in some respect. He could ignore the 44 mil and carry-on,
Reply #11 By: Citizen DPS - 11/3/2004 7:34:06 AM It's impossible for a democrat to win with all these hick states... I really encourage you to check out the Election 2004 results by county that USA Today will hopefully post soon. Once you see the results of that and realize that the spots of blue
Texas Wahine, I hope for all of our sakes that the U.S. military is used only when needed, and then only when they have been given the tools they need and the time to plan how to accomplish the goals they were assigned so that it's done with the lowest loss of life and fewest casualties and injuries possible. I am curious of something I may have missed along the way - who did your spouse support in this election and why?
Reply #16 By: Citizen Island Dog - 11/3/2004 1:54:17 AM Kerry just needs to concede. Don't drag the lawyers into this again. It may be their very last act before tort reform smacks them hard in the face. (At least I hope so). On the big plus side: John Edwards is gone from the senate, repl
Aw crap, no respect for Kerry and his friends now.... his campaign has already started carping that Ohio was called too early, it's not done, their side will win, blah blah blah. Die die die already. Please go away, give up, be a bigger man. Take the loss like you should. Hell, we all know that the Clinton Mafia went in and did an X-files number on the ballots in Ohio to ensure that their party candidate isn't gonna win because
I'll have a helluva lot more respect (it's not hard when it starts near zero) for John Kerry if he does peacefully concede and calls off the packs of lawyers that were signed up for potential fights in this election. I really hope he does give a gentlemanly and decent speech where he says we now need to support our duly elected president and get back to the work of accomplishing the tasks that must be undertaken.
Kerry "faked" plenty of photos -- they were called "moving pictures" and they were from Kerry's "re-enactments" of events in Viet Nam, or did some folks on the left conveniently forget Kerry's "home movies"? Kerry's campaign and his friends in the media "faked" memos about Bush's guard service and made sure that CBS took the story and ran with it as close to the election as they possibly could. Finally, Kerry's friends in the media, a
In short, I am not sure what more the left wants. 99 for me and 1 for you. That's what the left wants. Take all the money from the rich (i.e. people that have it) and give it back in the form of entitlements and benefits so that everyone becomes a ward of the "state" and is then perman
Link here: FT.com - Home UK - Canada deals blow to cheap US drug {ex}ports (original headline references drug IMports - as in import to U.S. from Canada But growing concern in Canada
Thirdly, the sanctions would never have been lifted since lifting them would have required a U.N. Security Council resolution that the U.S. would most certainly have vetoed. So, there was essentially NO CHANCE the sanctions would ever be lifted, therefore, there was NO CHANCE Iraq would be ABLE to recreate its WMD programs. Again
Then, in the 1990's, Clinton raised taxes further, in order to balance the budget, and Republicans everywhere warned of economic collapse. But what happened? The economy boomed. Which isn't necessarily to say that Clinton's tax hike helped the economy. But it certainly didn't hurt it. And a balanced budget has a more reliable eff
Check this article out for some discussion about bias in the media. It's quite interesting: Survey Finds Angst-Strained Wretches in the Fourth Estate <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=