So, it's ok when Kerry says (on the record) that "Bush lied", then says in a public debate between himself and Bush that (paraphrasing) 'lieing is a strong word, I wouldn't use that word' when asked if he has called Bush a liar? It's ok when Soros, Michael Moore, etc., call Bush a hate monger, war monger, Nazi, and other hateful words? It's ok when people call our president a moron, dumb
The discussion in d3adz0mbie's thread Why is President Bush 'throwing' this election? has me thinking again of something that many have missed about the question of what if we hadn't gone to war with Iraq. The media love to frame the question (and some of the simple politicians do too) as: Would Iraq be better off with Saddam still in power and Would the world be better off if Saddam was still in power and left alone, but that's not necessari
Reply #4 By: Patriot_Flamethrower - 10/7/2004 9:27:25 PM I stated SCIENTIFIC polling data.........NOT the "cheerleader"polls........typical lefties.......lousy reading comprehension. Oh, by the way, Newsweek is as LEFT as the New York Times, which is next door to Pravda. Any publication that
I argue that COL Gene and others are using factually incorrect arguments because they are. FACT - most of the Bush tax cuts HAVE NOT GONE INTO EFFECT yet. The biggest parts of the tax cuts that have hit so far don't come close to the totals that will hit over time. Because Congress wanted to spread the potential loss of revenue over time, they delayed many parts of the cuts, and put in sunset periods for others. Congress *just* ex
Reply #3 By: CrispE - 10/8/2004 10:22:02 AM hitparade: What I don't buy is a system where you have to make a choice between an SUV and health care. I don't buy such a system either. If you are that damn stupid that you choose an SUV when you know you don't have health care, then ple
More like "What is wrong with the democratic party that they couldn't nominate someone like Joe Lieberman?" He was a candidate that (before the 2000 election came along and he sold his soul out to be Gore's running mate) I used to have a lot of respect for, and whom, when standing on his own, I thought would be a good choice and make my decision a bit tougher. Instead, the Democrats went out and nominated a man with no core whose only
Reply #10 By: Citizen tugger1967 - 10/1/2004 3:16:33 PM Sorry to interup this lovers quarrel but Clinton balanced the budghet and ran up a SURPLUS so the buck stops with Bush Clinton was president while the Republicans that made a Contract with America balanced the budget, passed welfare reform, and
From DrudgeReport.com: LOCKHART: DEBATE CONSENSUS A 'DRAW' Unbeknownst to Kerry adviser Mike McCurry, a C-SPAN camera quietly followed McCurry as he found Kerry adviser Joe Lockhart on Spin Alley floor and asked him his impression of the debate. Lockhart candidly said to McCurry , “The consensus is it was a dra
A quick comment on those jobs mentioned by Insightful that were lost. I'd be very willing to bet that your friends that lost their jobs never had a second thought about buying whatever was cheapest before they found their jobs lost along the way. I too have been a victim of "downsizing" and/or "outsourcing", and like Dr. Guy, I immediately set about finding a new job that would pay for my self and my family as we continued to be
I wish someone would employ Col Gene and keep him too busy to post these biased and factually incorrect rants
Reply #27 By: COL Gene - 9/27/2004 6:57:18 AM Failure to obey a lawful order or regulation is a violation of Article 95 of the UCMJ. Bush did not obey the regulation to take the physical and was grounded. It is a great question as to why he was not punished. The Air Force also requires a rerport when ever a pilot is grounded.
PolMach Forums
Reply #1 By: Citizen Wingman412 - 9/26/2004 2:43:03 AM ROFL ROFL Glad you enjoyed it. A friend made me aware of that site yesterday, and it is definitely one of the funniest things I've ever seen. The saddest part is how
NOT SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE VIEWED WHEN KIDS ARE AROUND!!! OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE WARNING!! http://illwellpress.com/tech.html AGAIN, WARNING, NOT FOR THOSE THAT ARE EASILY ANNOYED AND/OR OFFENDED. (but very funny stuff, and well worth the viewing - please note I believe it uses Macromedia flash, and is -- as best I ca
(continuing the thought in the subject line.... Why would anyone vote for...) ... a Senator or Congress-person for President? I ask this because after talking with my wife the other day, I realized that one of the things that really lessens many of the Senators and Congress-persons as candidates for President is that these same individuals will tout their plans for the future and tell us all that they have fixes for all that ill's the country
Killian's secretary so far has come forward to say that the contents are definitely true. She didn't provide documentation, although she did confirm that Bush gained entry TXANG through the privilege of being the son of a wealthy and powerful family. She also stated that Bush behaved arrogantly and seemed to think he was above th
PolMach Forums
http://www.newscentral.tv/uploads/franchise/point/point-20040913.shtml which pairs up (for anyone that still doesn't believe it) a nice FACSIMILE copy of the original John Kerry provided report. http://www.newscentral.tv/t
Citizen Lee posted: 1. To creat new jobs because of all the one that have been lost sence Bush has been in office. U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics Employed in July 2004: 139.7 million Employed in Dec 2000 (last months of Clinton): 135.8 million Net increase of 3.9 million job
So, today Kerry takes the gloves off and starts decrying the swiftboat vet's ads and tries to link them to Bush. AP News (through MyWay) which goes on to say: <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF
PolMach Forums
Reply #1 By: JCHobbes - 8/19/2004 9:11:52 AM Do you think you could make a copy of Howard Dean without the bag over his head? Just use one of him screaming
Reply #38 By: kingbee - 8/18/2004 12:12:21 AM the Kerry campaign has *not* released the records of Kerry's military service you might want to reconsider this statement after you check this out Link And you might want to reconsider that also... Check out this link: <a hr
CrispE - be careful hoping for the government to encourage anything. The government could encourage (and is trying to now actually) non-smoking by raising the taxes on them until the taxes are so onerous no one smokes, or people only smoked black market or smuggled cigarettes or other materials. The government could encourage all citizens to change their diets to save themselves from obesity and leave us with foods that have no taste
Reply #22 By: MichaelProteus - 8/17/2004 9:13:59 PM Terpfan1980, The only thing that gives me heartburn is reading your diatribe, basically a litany of nothing. Of course they're going to argue Bush was never AWOL, what is he supposed to do, admit it? I think you don't like Mr. Moore because he's been able to expose s
Crispe - I'm sorry, but as pointed out in the thread above, favoring one man's religon over another is just cause for trouble. I believe in a higher authority, but I also believe that if that higher authority is as loving of "us" as we are told, then he doesn't require us to go to church and prove how holy we are. In any instance, I don't need the government to tell me that I should take Sunday off instead of Wednesday, or Saturday i
Deference - I still would like to know what you believe are lies by the SwiftVets. Even going to factcheck.org Link you wind up with this statement at the end of the discussion about the Swiftvets vs. Kerry: <TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Tex
Reply #26 By: Deference - 8/17/2004 4:16:01 PM Yes, the swiftvets are lying, that is the reason as to why many have asked for Bush to denounce them and why even Republicans are a bit miffed that such folk are making them look bad ( see, once again, Mcain ). Before you leave yourself open to charges