Reply #2 By: Politically Active - 10/3/2004 3:57:49 PM Honestly, even if you think that Kerry is a terrible person, how can you let that influence your vote? It's not like you will have to go on a date with him or anything. To me, it is more important to have a president that w
Reply #6 By: Politically Active - 10/3/2004 3:53:54 PM Bush lost Florida and thereby the election in 2000, but he is still officially labeled the president. Guess he can thank the supreme court for that. I wonder if the same will happen this year. You better go back and look again. There were "3
Reply #2 By: Deference - 10/3/2004 2:31:42 PM I'd be interested in knowing how ACORN might have discerned the difference between a rep. voter registration card and a dem. one. I don't know if voter registration cards are standard throughout all the states, but the one here in MO doesn't include any type of box to be fill
Florida Voter Fraud AGAIN!!! By: Ciperl Posted: Sunday, October 03, 2004 on Ciperl's Thoughts Message Board: Politics It seem that hundreds of Republican voters have now been disenfranchised in the state of Florida because of some Democrats-only voter registrations that have been taking place. This new disenfranch
POOR KERRY.. A BILLIONAIRE By: hitparade Posted: Sunday, October 03, 2004 on politcalhitparade Message Board: Politics Now with the dust settling polls show Kerry the perceived winner of th first debate. Nonetheless, the polls show Bush still ahead by at least six points; one poll even has Bush up by 11 points. <B
Reply #20 By: rugbyshawn - 10/3/2004 1:05:28 PM Way to take a comment out of context drmiler.... From the CNN transcript on the Kerry/Bush Q&A: LEHRER: What is your position on the whole concept of pre-emptive war? KERRY: The president always has the
Reply #12 By: WiseFawn - 10/3/2004 1:07:06 PM I am happy to report that the debates actually did make a difference for many undecided voters. Many have now decided on Kerry! Just maybe you should go look at this link. This is a state by state poll that is updated daily. And before being asked,
Reply #11 By: The Trellinator - 10/3/2004 11:04:38 AM See, that's just it though, I don't think that they DID see ALL of the same information. The intelligence that is released to the congress and to the American People is first vetted by the President and his advisors. The President clearly had access to more informatio
Why Bush will still lose By: sandy2 Posted: Monday, September 20, 2004 on Rants and Raves Message Board: Politics We have all seen the most recent polling data: And the election goes to Bush. But wait.. not so fast. We still have the military... and I'd wager to say there are at least a few military men who are up
Reply #42 By: sandy2 - 10/3/2004 12:19:24 PM Messy, are you trying to get Bush to win? And *if* she is does that make her a *bad person*?
Reply #37 By: sandy2 - 10/3/2004 11:13:58 AM Thats what drmiller would like you to believe. Right, and the one I responded to (dabe) is what *he'd* like us to believe.
Reply #11 By: rugbyshawn - 10/3/2004 9:09:42 AM 2) Kerry is more concerned with killing the terrorists that attacked the US rather than attack a country who's ties with Al Quada were tenuous at best before we attacked Iraq Actually if you listen
Reply #44 By: stevendedalus - 10/3/2004 12:01:15 AM I think your comments are deliberately designed to confuse. Only Democrats and liberals!
Reply #10 By: stevendedalus - 10/3/2004 12:38:46 AM you erroneously stated that our all-volunteer force is drasticly higher in cost than a draft force...that is pure bunk...do some research....a conscript force is far more expensive to maintain...due in part to the high turnover
Reply #9 By: The Trellinator - 10/3/2004 12:41:13 AM But Mr. Flamethrower, We told the wold that not only did Saddam have them, but that we knew where they were (presumably, that's how we knew that he had them). So, riddle me this. If we knew where the weapons were before war, when US troops weren't even on the gr
Reply #10 By: The Trellinator - 10/2/2004 9:18:21 PM Yeah, that's a very good point; in fact, it does remind me of the situation with Iraq. And, the evidence now clearly shows that the strategy of how we dealt with Iraq--a strategy that was initiated by George HW Bush--worked. At the time that we invaded Iraq, Saddam Hus
Reply #4 By: apdelong31 - 10/2/2004 10:23:47 PM Dabe said it about right. Kerry '04 Don't bet on it pal!!!
Reply #40 By: Gideon MacLeish - 10/2/2004 1:31:32 PM drmiler, Again, I will state the fact that that site uses polls that exclude Badnarik and Cobb (for the umpteenth time, Nader is not on many of those states' ballots), as a potentially fatal flaw in their analysis. Badnarik has polled as high as 5% in New Mex
Reply #6 By: COL Gene - 10/2/2004 4:36:02 PM Our war in Iraq is bankrupt in several ways. First, rogue states, like Iraq, Iran , North Korea will not attack a major power especially the only super power on earth today. The reason for this is very simple to do so would be to comm
Reply #37 By: American_girl65 (Anonymous) - 10/2/2004 6:39:49 PM To Drmiler You are correct, the article was written July 29, 1999, prior to the attack of 9/11/01 and during the Presidency of Bill Clinton. However, you seem to think that the article refutes what Co
Reply #35 By: dabe - 10/2/2004 5:10:48 PM "Why Bush will stil lose.........." I sure hope so Don't get your hopes up!
So the united states lost an entire generation of men? 292,000 American millitary forces died in world war II, compared with a total of more than 21,000,000. Your information is false! here's a link showing the actual numbers: <a href="http://ww
Reply #24 By: sandy2 - 10/2/2004 3:03:44 PM I didn't say they shouldn't blow up the vehicle, or destroy it, but arent there other ways to do it? Can the bradley be made to blow up after a certain time on it's own after the flip of a switch, with a warning to those in the area t
Reply #32 By: COL Gene - 10/2/2004 2:59:25 PM Thanks drmiler for the Link. How do you add them to your replies? I am new at the machanics. That article points to a " projected surples" Bush had a projected surples of $5.7 Trillion when he justified his first tax cut. If we did have a real surplus in that amount, I wouo
You're about to visit an external site:
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates, and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
JoeUser Forums