Who Really Won...Bush/Kerry By: Silver_and_Jade_Tears Posted: Friday, October 01, 2004 on Silvery Tears Message Board: Politics Last night the first debate between Bush and Kerry. I listened to the debate on the radio, as Ido not own a TV. I am undecided between the two, and do not really lean either way. Personal
Reply #19 By: jonsaw (Anonymous) - 10/2/2004 12:51:57 PM I feel the crew of the Apache helicopter that fired the missile shouldn't have valued the items in the Bradley more than they did the lives of the people they could see around the Bradley, though if there were usable weapo
Reply #30 By: COL Gene - 10/2/2004 6:59:04 AM Some help for drmiler and the Budget Surplus I believe the problem may be that drmiler expected the national debt to drop when the surplus existed. He did not see that on the treasury link. The reason for this is that our government did not apply or use the surplus in
Reply #69 By: oligarchy314 - 10/2/2004 1:30:02 AM You may think that the courts have been correct on every single issue drmiler...but I don I think NO such thing so quit putting words in my mouth! I never
Reply #23 By: vibr25 - 10/2/2004 10:40:17 AM Its so strange how people are blinded by there believes and can't see the truth that is staring them in the face And just what truth would that be?
Reply #67 By: oligarchy314 - 10/2/2004 12:57:56 AM It should have been Shoulda, coulda, woulda! The fact remains that it wasn't
Reply #34 By: stevendedalus - 10/2/2004 12:50:25 AM Silver, don't mix me up with drmiler's drivel; nor should you apologize to him. I, however, do apologize to you for being perhaps curt and unclear. I simply meant that you are pretty much leaning to Bush, though tentative. On the other hand, drmiler's link is POSITIVELY Bush
The phrase "one nation under god" couldn't be a more obvious violation of the seperation of church and state If that was seriously the case don't you think it would have been shot down in 1950 when it was introduced?
Reply #9 By: Daiwa - 10/2/2004 12:25:37 AM Funny - the most important thing to accomplish in the debate was to "look" presidential. Never mind he was an empty suit with a good tan Yeah but the tan wasn't real. It was a spray job.
Reply #25 By: American_girl65 (Anonymous) - 10/2/2004 12:20:57 AM To GX "Drmiler just doews not get it about the annual surples that we had in 98,99 $ 2000." That satement was not in reference to how the surplus got there, it is in reference to Drmiler denying the surpluses ever happened. If you read back t
Hey guys I know you may not think this is pertinent, but I'm going to put it out anyway. Here is a link to the *latest SBV ad*! Link
Reply #18 By: COL Gene - 10/1/2004 8:10:22 PM Sorry, The Office Of the President,and OMB clearly document an annual surplus in 98,99,2000. You are not looking at the annual budget but the cumulative debt including interest. One ic cumulative the other is the net of a single years transactions Rev less Exp. in one year on
Reply #16 By: COL Gene - 10/1/2004 7:05:53 PM Lets get a few facts streight. The total debt is made up of that held by the public (US and Foreign) and that which is held by the US Governmnet mostly in the Social Security and Medicate Trust Funds. There is a difference between
Reply #80 By: Deference - 10/1/2004 6:02:55 PM We are drinking.....to your health. "Um, yeah, ma'am, these two gentleman would like a pitcher of your finest, and I'll go with a forty of Old English. Yeah, that'll be credit card, thanks." Olde English? If that's the best you can affo
Reply #77 By: Deference - 10/1/2004 5:03:37 PM ..all right, all right, we'll get a pitcher!! Cool by me! What kind are we drinking?
Reply #72 By: Deference - 10/1/2004 3:39:18 PM In reaction to your post #71, Silver and Jade: How does future children seen as undeveloped throw aways tie in with seeing women as sex toys? Men and women are equally at fault when it comes to the conception of a child. Here comes a REAL shocker!!
Reply #10 By: tugger1967 - 10/1/2004 3:16:33 PM Sorry to interup this lovers quarrel but Clinton balanced the budghet and ran up a SURPLUS so the buck stops with Bush Wrong answer sir! Check the link below from US Treasury Dept. And PLEASE pay attention to the years Clinton was in 1992-2000
JoeUser Forums
Reply #10 By: tugger1967 - 10/1/2004 3:12:50 PM You know you really don't have to use the name of the country when talking of the "coalition" feel free to call the Polish truck driver by name, and the Australian rowing team as well. I would not be so quick to dismiss the United Kingdom and Spain
Reply #64 By: thatoneguyinslc - 10/1/2004 2:59:01 PM Lets face a few facts here folks. Bush is no debater. The guy hasn't even mastered the english language. He has no viable arguement for how bad things are going for him on all fronts. How could Kerry NOT win the debate? bush 2.0 could only repeat the same tired rhetori
JoeUser Forums
Reply #7 By: landen81 - 10/1/2004 2:55:56 PM Because they have first hand knowledge of politics, the government, the Republican party. That STILL does not make their opinion any more valid than yours or mine.
Reply #62 By: Deference - 10/1/2004 2:50:38 PM Just *maybe* you should go read this link. Seems not everyone is as optimistic as you seem to be Yeah, I checked that out. There are a lot of Republicans cheerleading for the president, such as Senator Weld who claimed Bush "won" the debate. I'm so sorry, if Kerry had
Reply #26 By: Silver_and_Jade_Tears - 10/1/2004 2:45:00 PM republican* I can spell, really! Aw come on, you only missed a "p".
Reply #58 By: sandy2 - 10/1/2004 2:31:02 PM You know what really bugs me? The right calls the UN a burden, a dead weight group, a waste, but then they feel free to utilize the UN's information when it helps their case, and even in cases where it doesn't like this one. They resort to an organization they don't respect beca
JoeUser Forums
Reply #3 By: landen81 - 10/1/2004 2:36:19 PM Your opinion is completely hypothetical. Who's to say they would react in an opposite manner? This is true. But are not ALL opinions hypothetical?
Reply #17 By: Silver_and_Jade_Tears - 10/1/2004 2:33:20 PM But you should make things more clear...esp since I wasn't the only one that saw that against me...drmiler I'm very sorry.But I have no idea how to make it more clear as to whom the comment was directed at other than by putting the
You're about to visit an external site:
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates, and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
