WOW! You are quick! Thanks for the listing. As for talking, yes they should. But I will not let my under 10 year olds see it (oh, wait! My youngest is 12!). Ok, but you get the point.
Why? Do you have any tattoos? You're never too old to get inked, as far as I'm concerned. [/quote} No, I dont have any, and my underage children dont have any. And I wont allow them to until they are of age. But yours is cute! Sorry, just a parent thing.
Add Richmond! Damn, and I didnt even see the stupid nipple! I was on the potty! What is are the call letters, and I will add it to the list? W
I agree with IG, but I will abstain for now.
Add Richmond! Damn, and I didnt even see the stupid nipple! I was on the potty!
You go Lady! Congrats!
Is he your Husband? If not, grab a mate for this guy or gal! Very nice.
Yes I have a mix of Libertarian in with my liberal ideas. Mostly I believe in mostly small government (some social programs do serve a good purpose) and the government staying out of peoples lives as much as possible. And just to make myself clear, this article was written about Evangelicals because I saw the article about Falwell. I have just as much contempt for the t
I firmly believe in picking your battles. It IS possible to raise teens who have a decent moral standard; I have witnessed it many times myself. I believe that teens, as with all of us, will give a certain deference to a leader they respect...parents included. You just hit a hot button. I dated a lady who said just that. And her daughter i
Psikotick got me to thinking. He wrote an excellant article of his fears of the Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell. No one will argue they are the representatives, if not the poster boys of the religious Right. Psi was afraid that they would get their way now that Bush has a 'mandate'. basically, we did not disagree on what the duo wanted, just on if they would get it. But in the discussion, we found out we are pretty much in sync in our beliefs. We just c
It sounds nasty, and I dont think very many will buy it. I think it is just a publicity gimic, and in that, a good one! !
Shadesofgrey, no Whoman69 got it. The author was just generalizing in reverse. Steven, by your last statement does that mean you agree with the generalization? or contradict it?
Gideon, yea, but are they teens yet? ouch! Rebellion time! I only have 2 pairs. I figured I did my part for the procreation of the human race!
Yes I have a mix of Libertarian in with my liberal ideas. Mostly I believe in mostly small government (some social programs do serve a good purpose) and the government staying out of peoples lives as much as possible. And just to make myself clear, this article was written about Evangelicals because I saw the article about Falwell. I have just as much c
Yea, a friend of mine showed me that (she is a democrat who supports Bush, but does not like him). The French did it after 9-11. Snopes has a debunk article on it. I guess I will take it with a salt lick!
We test them on our soil, so it is not like we are picking on you. besides, if you paid attention to the war in Afghanistan and iraq, you would see they are pretty damn accurate! Got any demolition projects that need taking care of?
PS: Pick a party and your also just asking to receive propaganda/junk mail asking for donations clogging your mail box. Very true! Stay independant.
No it doesn't apply only to what I believe is right. But there is a difference. It is the accepted (majority) view in the scientific community that people are born gay, where as polygamy is a choice. As for pedophilia, the child doesn't have the capacity to consent to sex, just as we say they don't have the capacity to drive, vote, enter contracts, etc. We protect the m
Dr. Guy: Well, I'm not for communism but what does that have to do with it? Chomsky isn't paid by the government either. Hager on the other hand... Gonzales on the other hand... it is a demonstration of extremes, and where we dont want to go. Simply put, this is a good topic, why bastardize it with extremes?
And please do not turn this into an argument about abortion or same sex marriages. These are merely two examples of areas of disagreement between liberals and Evangelicals.And please do not turn this into an argument about abortion or same sex marriages. These are merely two examples of areas of disagreement between liberals and Evangelicals. <
She wouldn't stand a snowballs chance in hell. Virginia hasn't gone Dem since LBJ in 1964. yea, I agree. I dont see her winning any of the south. That puts her at a big disadvantage from the get go. Side Note: What did you think of Wilder and the 79%? WooHOO! He is one of my favorites! I got a pic
The main message that Falwell sends is that the "political capital" they raised in electing W should be spent on taking the country as close to a theocracy as they can. I know many will not agree with me but once these movements get mobilized bad things happen. Today for example, W appointed a board on Women's Health Issues that is going to be chaired by Dr. W. David Ha
The more I read the article, the less objections I have. So, Jerry Falwell wants to lobby for more conservative justices and judges, and something's wrong with that? Do non-religious groups not try to get the people they want in office? Only in the Liberal play book. MM and BS and steel tits lobby
If you dont get 20/20, they can fine tune it. Mine still dry out easy and then my vision gets hazy. But when I keep it lubricated, they are as good as with any glasses or contacts I have ever had! Look at it this way. It has been 2 weeks, you no longer wear glasses and the vision is improving daily! it does take time as impatient as we are! But it sure is great!
On a local level I'd have to say he might be able to do something. But VA is not the entire US. And there aren't enough nut-jobs that buy into his evangelical BS to make what he's talking about possible. DR, and you would be wrong. But only in your assumption of the affecting local stuff. See
JoeUser Forums
PolMach Forums