COL Gene

COL Gene

Joined Member # 1516792
0 Posts 0 Replies 672 Reputation

An annual effort to balance federal spending in such areas as forestry, education, space technology, and the national defense, with revenue, which the United States collects largely through federal taxes. Of the three branches of the U.S. government, Congress has the power to determine federal spending, pursuant to Article I, Section 9, of the U.S. Constitution, which states, "No money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Reply By: danielostPosted: Saturday, November 17, 2007The actions of the Majority of Congress is not a PLOY. It is the GOP in the Congress and the President that are using a PLOY to prevent what the MAJORITY of Congress want. oh and this is constitutional.it is called checks and balances. and if the majority of congress wanted th

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Reply By: danielostPosted: Saturday, November 17, 2007Bush is NOT the DECIDER and he is to the decider. that is why the president was given the power of the veto. and congress has the right to over rule him. it is called a veto over ride. Better read the Constitution. Congress NOT the President

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Friday, November 16, 2007They do have the authority to stop funding the war, and the right. But that's not what they tried here is it. All they have to do to end the war is to say, "no, not another dime". But they don't do that, do they. No! Instead they play unconsitutional games with the funding and s

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Newsflash, No member of Congress is given authority to decide how a war is to be fought. I don't care which side of the aisle they sit on, or how much military experience they may have... The U.S. Constitution is VERY clear on this. Congress has the power to END the war and to end the funding! </

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Reply By: pseudosoldierPosted: Friday, November 16, 2007The Congress can impose restrictions on a funding Bill.I understand that they can, I'm certainly not convinced that they should. Especially with it being fairly obvious that the Republican party would block such a bill. In that case, I feel it's both parties inability to com

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Reply By: Island DogPosted: Friday, November 16, 2007Gene, it's really pathetic how you obviously try to blame everything on Bush and the GOP. I have stated the facts. The House provided the funding for the War and the GOP members in the Senate PREVENTED it from being voted on. WHY?

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Reply By: danielostPosted: Friday, November 16, 2007Why won't the Democrats send up a bill without that deadline in it? On the other hand, why can't the Republicans push up a bill that has no deadline, and get it passed?they did it also was defeated today No that is what the majority of Congress want

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Why won't the Democrats send up a bill without that deadline in it? The Congress can impose restrictions on a funding Bill. The fact is that the GOP members of the Senate would not allow the bill to come to a vote and are thus stopping the funding for the war. What the House Bill does is what the maj

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Reply By: Island DogPosted: Friday, November 16, 2007Although many of the Democrats are to the left, you do not hear the continual chant from the Democratic Presidential candidates that they are Liberals as you her from the GOP candidates they are Conservatives.You have completely convinced me you either have absolutely no knowle

36 Replies 13,128 Views

The House approved $50 Billion for the Iraq War and Senate GOP members prevented that bill from coming to a vote. It is now clear what is stopping the Iraq War Funding are the GOP members of Congress and George W. Bush. I would suggest the Defense Secretary address his comments to them. If our troops do not have what they need it is clearly becau

162 Replies 37,845 Views

Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Friday, November 16, 2007Bush and the GOP have one simple creed- We will listen to you and then do it OUR WAY!That's because Bush and the GOP are not conservatives, Col. We're speaking different languages here. ALL but one ( Dr. Paul) of the GOP Presidential candidate

36 Replies 13,128 Views

Reply By: Adventure-DudePosted: Friday, November 16, 2007Conservatives, for the record, are conservative because they believe, AS DID OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, in leaving many matters to the state and local government and recognizing the freedom of the individual.And are more likely to compromise in comparison to the far left. </

36 Replies 13,128 Views

Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Friday, November 16, 2007you do not hear the continual chant from the Democratic Presidential candidates that they are Liberals as you her from the GOP candidates they are Conservatives.Bullshit.Conservatives, for the record, are conservative because they believe, AS DID OUR FOUNDING FATHERS, in l

36 Replies 13,128 Views

Every time any of the GOP Presidential candidates talk they try and demonstrate they are more conservative then the other GOP candidates. Most conservatives are Republicans and only 23% of registered voters are Republicans. There are more Independent voters then either Republican or Democrat and most Independents do not support the conservative views. The D

36 Replies 13,128 Views

When David Kay inspected the Curveball site on Feb 8, 2003 and learned the BIO WMD story was not true, he should have told Powell. Then if Powell had come forward it would have been much harder for Bush to invade Iraq. However, Powell was not informed that the Bio story was a lie until April 2003 after Bush had invaded Iraq!

140 Replies 39,229 Views

Reply By: danielostPosted: Friday, November 16, 2007the Yellow Cake were not true. In fact Tenet had the Yellow Cake story REMOVED from a Speech Cheney gave in October 2002. but the found yellow cake in iraq. The Yellow cake they found was acquired much earlier and had NOTHING to do with the story Bush

140 Replies 39,229 Views

Reply By: danielostPosted: Friday, November 16, 2007In 1941 we believed Hitler was attempting to develop the Atom Bomb and he was developing Rockets. in 2001 we believed that saddam was attempting to develop the atom bomb and he did have rockets. NOT TRUE!!! The CIA Director told Bush and Cheney that t

140 Replies 39,229 Views

danielostNovember 16, 2007 08:24:17Reply #131 Such is NOT the case in Iraq and anyone that would say so is a FOOL! what if Iraq had taken over the middle east they wouldn't have been a threat to us. and you call me a fool. when we entered world war 2 because of the jap attack on us. we focused on defeating Hitler not japan. japan was an after thought. There was also Intel that Hitler was working on the atom bo

140 Replies 39,229 Views

Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007ok so the only reason to place our troops at risk is to protect our country. then why were we in europe during world war 2, and what was that war before that oh yeah world war 1. Because Hitler was allied with Japan who attacked us and if Hitler had

140 Replies 39,229 Views

Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007lets see to stop a man from killing people just because he wants to.to stop a man from commiting genecide.(i know you forgot about the kurds) The ONLY reason to place our troops at risk is to protect our country. Saddam was not committing geno

140 Replies 39,229 Views