Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007lets see to stop a man from killing people just because he wants to.to stop a man from commiting genecide.(i know you forgot about the kurds) The ONLY reason to place our troops at risk is to protect our country. Saddam was not committing geno
Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007and again sir you are a coward. do not know who you bribed or black mailed to be called a col. but there is no way in the world you earned it. You have not earned the right to call me a coward. I served my country and I tell it like it is. You
Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007Supporting internal factions to depose the leader, support other Moslem countries to take action or in extreme cases assassinate him it is illegal for the united states to assassinate a countries leaders.and only a coward would hire someone else to fight his fight for him.whic
Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007now tell me oh stupid one how do you remove the leader of another country Supporting internal factions to depose the leader, support other Moslem countries to take action or in extreme cases assassinate him O' Stupid ONE! What you do not do i
Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007Citing the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution reiterated that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Saddam Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement. It did not say by invading Iraq!
Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007NOTE IT AUTHOURZED the use of force. It The resolution cited many factors to justify the use of military force against Iraq: NONE of the REASONS DIRECTED Bush to use Force.
Reply | | DeleteReply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007you idiot this resolution(declaration of war) was passed a year before we attacked. Saddam was given up to the last moment to comply. he didn't. Saddam had allowed the UN Inspectors back into Iraq. Had Bush allowed them to complete t
Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007NOTE IT AUTHOURZED the use of force. It did not direct Bush to invade Iraq nor does the resolution say a State of WAR exists between the United States and Iraq! ok where was he supposed to use this force isreal? It did not say he was to use force
Reply By: danielostPosted: Thursday, November 15, 2007The UN said DO NOT invade Iraq and we did it without their OK and without a declaration of War by Congress!!!!! sorry we don't answer to the UN. the following countries and groups were getting rich off of Iraq and Saddam so of course they didn't want us to attack. France, Germ
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 14, 2007gee maybe you should actually read something.korea wasn't a declared war either. a lot more people died there. We were part of a UN Action in Korea which is not the case in Iraq. The UN said DO NOT invade Iraq and we did it without their OK and w
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 14, 2007what you have basically said in the last couple of posts is that congress declared war on Iraq but told bush not to attack them. man like i said the more i read what you write them more stupid the congress sounds. which then begs the question why should we trust any of those
Reply By: joe-pro-photographerPosted: Wednesday, November 14, 2007If Curveball isn't enough, read Woodward's State of Denial. You won't sleep at night. The entire WMD thing was a fraud, based on outdated and flimsy evidence. That's just a fact. At best, Bush was hoodwinked by yes men who wanted to fulfill his profecy. At worse, h
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 14, 2007next time give me something hard to do You have not shown where Congress directed the INVASION of Iraq. They gave Bush the OPTION to invade Iraq. Congress failed to meet the Constitutional REQUIREMENT to formally declare war before the President ha
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 14, 2007Congress did not propose to invade Iraq. It was Bush and his BS about Mushroom Clouds and that Saddam was a danger to our country that enabled Bush to get Congress to pass the Iraq War resolution that DID NOT require Bush to invade Iraq. It ALLOWED it as a LAST RESORT. If Bus
Reply | Edit | DeleteReply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 14, 2007What I have said is correct and it was Bush who took this country to war so bush ordered our troops to invade iraq and congress just sat on their hands. that is even worse than not reading the intel before voting to go to war. <
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 14, 2007gene even if everything you say is right(which it isn't). you would still be wrong because you will not put everyone involved under the same microscope. What I have said is correct and it was Bush who took this country to war --NO ONE ELSE! </
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, November 14, 2007all that BS about the Mushroom clouds was just a scare tactic Bush and Cheney used to get Congress to pass the Iraq War resolution. yes we know hillary was to stupid to read the info that was presented to her. It was not Hillary that said we were
Reply By: DaiwaPosted: Tuesday, November 13, 2007In the case of every international conflict, there were individuals & institutions, both internal & external, opposed to the actions of certain governments & certain individuals and who voiced those objections beforehand.There was substantial vocal and widely reported antiwar and i
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 13, 2007look there were 537 people minus the 4 or 5 who voted no that declared war on Iraq. they had the same Intel that the president had. the British government declared war they had the same Intel. so if the Intel was faulty then it was the CIA not the president that lied.
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 13, 2007The majority of Iraqi's think it is OK to KILL Americans!the majority of muslims think it is ok to kill anyone.the majority of iraqis think it is ok to kill iraqis did i miss anything. Then WHY are we risking the lives of our military in Iraq?
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 13, 2007There was WMD in Iraq.i still say there was YOU LIE. The CIA, Bush and David Kay say there was none. <TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Tex
Reply | Edit | DeleteReply By: Adventure-DudePosted: Tuesday, November 13, 2007Col, Here's your sign. That is YOUR SIGN Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 13, 2
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 13, 2007In 1944 the French did not consider us Invaders’ when we landed at Normandy and drove out the Germans.we weren't fighting the french we were fighting the germans. i promise you the germans thought of us as invaders. You are full of BS. EVERYTHING
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 13, 2007That is not what Bush and Cheney told us. They said we would be liberators and would be greeted as such. so we were also invaders. that is what you call people when they invade another country good or bad. That is not correct. In 1944 the French
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, November 13, 2007that we would be considered invaders of course we were invaders That is not what Bush and Cheney told us. They said we would be liberators and would be greeted as such. WHAT BS!!!!!!!<TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=cente
JoeUser Forums