I was just using Draignol's insight: "And to fairly definitively answer this question, 52% of Americans support going into Iraq compared to only 46% who disapprove of going into Iraq. That's well outside the margin of error (in an exit poll that was already tilted a bit incorrectly in Kerry's favor based on the actual results) . So yes, most Americans are glad we went into Iraq even though most people think things are going po
DPS
Your right. Bush might not have gotten re-elected because Americans thought he was doing a bad job. Unfortunately the worth of the endaevor in the majority of American's minds makes up for the mistaks. A majority of Americans felt Bush was doing sub-par on his wars. Then there is the question of wether Iraq was justified. A minority of Americans feel Iraq was not justified. according to the exit polls. I
He is spending millions in dollars supporting a war he is constantly botching up. I thought everyone would agree on that.
The difference between Reagan and Bush is that Reagan was a good president who didn't deserve negative coverage while Bush deserves as much negative coverage as possible.
This also assumes that these people were craving and were actually calling for freedom and that the Army should free them. Unfortunately the Iraqis submitted to authoutarian rule. They even collapsed on each other when they lost their ruler. It shows that they survived on an evil dictator and rather then face opression idly waited and survived it. I think it would explain how the loyalists got Saddaam on the election ballot until US disapproval made th
"Yes lets because it is the right thing to do. " I must disagree to that persuasion. It tells our forefathers that we should have waited for France to free us for nothing. "God Helps that help themselves" I don't think we should be saving people who can't sustain their own democracy for the cost of nothing. Let's face it. The lives of American Soldiers place more of a benefi
" This is the spin from the left. What is marriage currently? A man and a woman. Any law stating marriage as a man and a woman is only stating WHAT CURRENTLY IS! You can't BAN something that doesn't exist. To ban something implies to take away that which already is, and this is not the case. " Marriage is not clearly defined. A marirage is decided and defined by the 2 people involved and their religous nature. Legally yes I concede i
"Agree or disagree, Bush got up and did something about it (Afghanistan). I haven't seen any other terrorist attacks in the US since, and is because of George W." I think it can be attributed to any action that probably most Presidents would take after such an attack. Isn't this odd that they tell us Bush did a better job then Gore could have ever done and that Kerry would have backed down and lied in a corner on 9/11 and then call some people
"It really all started becoming clear at the Superbowl. When Janet Jackson's breast was displayed for all to see, the left's reaction was "Get over it!" and "Deal with it!" They showed no respect whatsoever for the values of the majority of Americans who are trying to raise children in the way they see fit. " You still remember that. I know there were some Democrats put off by it too and Republicans who said get over it. It's not even politica
"knows who the right man for the job is." Only time will tell that my friend.
And the Religous Right shouldn't be pushing it down the liberal states throat by trying to amend constitution or making laws banning all Gay Marriage everywhere.
Government make legal binding for marraige. Recongnization of a legal vow/binding is not the same as recongnization of love. First off why are they using a term that has normally connotated love and religion for years? Second off if it isn't recognizing love then why should it be able to judge one more worthy then another and furthermore dictating what marriage is. From BadNarick Campagna Website When government permission
"Especially when he disapproves affirmative action." Fredrick Douglas was against Affirmitive Action.
Personally I don't care about the Iraqi plight and think they should pay several millions in Saviour fees or become the 52nd state of the US. Then again I am a hearltess asshole.
"And this is not about "technicalities", this is a matter of discrimination against black voters. " *sigh* We went through this in Florida and yet none of those people even held marches or tried to correct "the corrupt system". If so many voters are disenfranchised why aren't they rising to the streets instead of letting you speak for them.
"People who think marriage is just between two person is crazy. Marriage is more than that, it is also about being a "recongized" union recongnized by the coummunity" And so this community is supposed to also give special rights to these people who are supposed to be in love? Personally I don't think the government should be recongizing any union as more special then another. I get it now. Your going to secure rights with marriage but your goi
". So that will be your assumption that nothing would be different." No I supported Kerry ,vut that is on the fact that I hate Iraq Wars and therfore hate Bush and his authoutarian policy. I am not listening to the rest of your far left propaganda. My view is that Iraq was wrong but the UN makes no difference in the equasion. Muslims are going to be racially profiled not because of Bush but because of a heighened fear from 9/11. There is a
I still don't see why are granting Extra Rights to married couples anyway...
dubz "DPS, he does pick a religion over another. you really think he likes muslims? he hates them. He doesnt say that cause hes the president. " All right you extremist Mike Moore Liberals better stop talking out both sides of your ass. Does he either (a) Have a favorable reputation with Saudis or (b) Hate Muslims and beleives they are evil. Obvioussly it's one or the other. I personally see Bush
If there is a draft the government will not be listened to. It will be a joke as thousands refuse to go to war while Bush watches his empire crumble. Though this will not happen. "But Bush is trying to get religion in office, its immoral and people are so gullible and believe anything that is said. Everyone says there will be no draft with bush." That's what people want. It's not against the constitution. Please cite the Seperartion
It's official. This world is going to end in holy war between Atheists, Muslims and Christians.
Oprah FOR PRESDINT. She will give everyone Ipods and SuV's Plus it will solve over population. Half the population will have a heart attack. The first black and woman president!!!
My definition of marriage : Marriage is a special union between 2 individuals and their God. No other mortal should be allowed to define whether this union is worthy of the term Marriage or not. Carrying on with that defintion I don't think the government should be regulating or recognizing certain unions as marriage or not and definetly should not be giving people rights or favorable laws depending on wether they are married or not in the go
"There is something twisted about celebrating any human's death." Even Hitler's?
HEATHEN!! Don't mock my Prophet. Seriously. What did you want them to do? Vote against their morals? Sorry sir but that is not America. Morality is Legislatable and voting for religous reason is acceptable. It might seem narrow minded to a All Knowing Scientific Atheist like yourself but it isn't to the bigger half of the country and the majority and therefore we will lean t