Actually you mean atheist. That means undecided. I realize that. I just didn't want to assume he was an unbeliever.
The WASP0273
supernatural is the stuff that dont happen...like fiery chariots picking up prophets. Clearly an Agnostic. *grins*
There is no reason to "redefine marriage." Let's give marriage back to the churches and redefine civil unions instead. Now that's not a bad idea.
Your completely right about them being seperate arguments. We are told that we may live in this world but that we are not "of" this world, and mans struggle is to attempt to live more spiritually and seperate himself more from the carnal. I guess the point I was trying to make is that God made the world and all the little critters. He did not make them homosexual so I find it hard to believe that it is a natural thing. I think it is an aberra
I have heard of that study and it is totally bogus. It amounts to the same thing as a dog humping your leg. It does not prove homosexuality in nature. And infogeek...Thats kind of what I was getting at. They can CALL it whatever they want but it's not the same and should NOT have any legal benefits.
I feel that no matter what packaging you place on it, homosexuality is wrong. It is not found in nature, therefore I view it as "un"natural, according to my Christian beliefs. I should qualify my statements by admitting that I am, indeed, a born again Christian. I am not, however, a racist, nor a classist. I harbor no ill-will toward anyone. In fact, my credo
Welcome. I just started my own blog as well so I know of what you speak. Maybe we could argue some. Just for practice -- it runs in my family too -- one question...are you a liberal? If so, we could argue forever. Good luck in your new veture. ~The W.A.S.P.~