pport of an attacked ally. Good change to morality. Paul.
Solitair
o turn off random events period. Paul.
ke the time to research the technology. Paul.
jreynol2, don't panic. You'll be able to see the site long before the actual beta starts. I'm sure it's just a slight mistake that pre-orders can't yet view the site. To be fair to Stardock, only the people who have actually bought GC, AP or TGN directly from Stardock and given money to them have made the sequel possible, so it's only fair that they get the first look. Pre-orders haven't yet actually paid anything, but will certainly get a look soon. And those who bought GC in a s
oarders existed, the AI would need to be designed to make use of these and consider the influence of these on it's policies. That may be more work and cost than can be reasonably expected from the sequel. Paul.
Drmiler, you are confusing legally binding within the US with legally binding in international courts nad laws. While the US may decide that it's presidents signature and 25 years of support may not constitute acceptance the rest of the world will not. Once treaties reach the required quorate then they become international treaties and are in force worldwide. Yes individual countries can ignore treaties on their own soil, but trying to wiggle ou
broke the terms of a ceasefire with us I personally agree that this is a very important reason why Saddam needed to be removed. Rough states and dictators need to know that there is a line that cannot be crossed. The flouting of the ceasefire agreements and then jumping back across the line every time
One of the things I would love to see changed in GC2 is the way difficulty is handled. In GC1 difficulty was effectively all about bonus' and changes to difficulty just changed the bonus'. In GC2 I would like to see this continued but also for difficulty level to have changes in gameplay. Some examples - Fog of war: lowest difficulty has no FOG with player seeing all planets and ships from the start. Medium levels allow player to see
ach other. Perhaps in GC2 allowing this direct modification of sliders every Y turns would be good as well. The player could be automatically prompted to change a slider (if desired) after every Y turns (or UP meeting). Paul.
nd allies or friends should not be considered evil, maybe even slightly good. paul.
Well I supported the war despite being convinced that WMD did not exist so makes no difference to my stance. I'm pretty embarrassed at the mess of the occupation though. Paul.
Actually drmiler, it's not legally as simple as that. As you are no doubt aware, the lack of ratification on a treaty does not automatically make it non binding. The signature alone, coupled with 25 years of tacit ascent to the protocols makes a legal case for a contractural ratification. You need to remember that the US has referred to the protocols as in force in numerous instances, especially when discussing treatment of it's spies. It has us
Moderateman, even the US government now believes that no WMD exists and have stopped looking. How much more right wing than GWB are you? Most people do believe Bush is on the right of centre. So that meaqns that the left, the centre and the right all believe that WMD didn't exist at the time of the invasion. So where do you stand? Ultra far right? Paul.
no scientific principle has ever been established without people of science believing in it long before they could prove it I'm afraid that as a scientist I must strongly disagree with this. I understand what you are saying but this only really applies to evolving scientific work and not to science in g
I do not think 4 frenchmen inna 12 ft klamath qualifies assa carrier Moderateman, what was the point of that comment? Brad wrote this article because of people unjustly laughing at the US aid, and in response you just laugh at the French aid. Why? Why can't you just accept it. Are you really that racist
Sorry but we never ratified that section of the protocols I'm well aware that the US never ratified the two additional protocols to the Geneva conventions, but they did sign them and never contested those signatures. Enough countries did ratify the accords to bring them into international law, and 25 ye
ust accordingly. You end up with a very versatile government system, which allows players to play any kind of governmen thtey desire, without any micromanagement or governmnet swapping. paul.
Dr Guy, I have many times stated that the US is doing a good job here and should be appluaded. What part of 'an excellent job' makes you think that I don't see this as 'well done America'? To argue about my paragraph order is very pedantic and purely a matter of writing sytle. There are two short paragraphs with me clearly referrencing the question the first paragraph was responding to. The second paragraph then stresses the good work
In a major change to previous policy, the UN has asked PWC to handle the tracking of donations for the tsunami relief and also to be responsible for investigating any allegations of fraud, waste or abuse. The UN has obviously learned from the oil for food scandal that handling of such large funds needs to be totally transparent and also needs to be separated from the actual people responsible for spending the money. A step in the right directi
Drmiler, as commented in my original post the protocols to the Geneva convension (put together in 1978) were written to deal with this whole issue of stateless wars and terrorists. They were in fact put in place after the experience of Vietnam. They give very clear definitions of how any enemy combatants should be treated. I've posted these in a separate article a long while back so will just link to
What did china and france send, a couple row boats? nice to see more ignorance from the US side by the second post. France also sent a carrier to the region, but can we say well done France? No we can't. We just look at this as an oppertunity to spread ignorance and slander France. China has sent more a
ld all colony ships can act as invasion transports and combat ships can kill 1M colonists (per ATT value) per turn. Would make those new colonies vunerable, stop land grabs and lead to a more considered and supported expansion. Paul.
attack force making them useable later in the game. Paul. PS. I know there are 3 ATT and DEF values.
u the current government settings that your actions have determined, and make clear the bonus' associated with any changes to givernment. Paul.