[quote]Including lack thereof.[/quote] Word.
Excalpius
[quote]I only see 1 person posting 5 times in a row one time, 6 in another...[/quote] Well the quotes don't automatically include people's user names, so this is how I respond to 5 or 6 different posts. I don't want to ignore any questions. And I'm working on something right now, so I can't be on the forum 24/7, so I guess that means I am in "burst mode". [e digicons]:D[/e]
[quote]Successful executives , along with sharply defined business skills also practice temperance, humilty, rationality, empathy et cetera, et cetera.[/quote] Really? How many billionaires do you know? Would your description apply to Ruper Murdoch for example? JP Morgan? Regardless, if you knew me personally, you'd know just how massively off base you are with claiming I'm not as you describe. My posts have been about our nation having empathy
[quote]Wow, have you ever heard of the edit button? [/quote] Because of the non-threaded nature of this forum, I have no idea who you are addressing with this.
[quote]Since when did this post become a 'Mine is bigger than yours' and[/quote] Brad took it there and I've been trying to end it. I finally responded as carefully and balanced as I could and it's just spiralled out as those pissing contests always do. Sigh. [quote]'I'm right and the rest of you are idiots'? [/quote] I don't believe I have insulted anyone here. At least I've been really, really trying to keep my end of things civil.
[quote]Seems like everyone except you thinks the way you handle yourself reflects badly on you.[/quote] And yet, my karma keeps climbing...daily. Even from those I disagree with. Thanks to everyone who hates me! [e digicons]:grin:[/e] Regardless, as I said before, the "everyone thinks" argument is fallacious and poor debate tactics. You have no idea how many private responses I am getting regarding this thread. 1 or a 100. Nor does it
[quote]So you can prove there is no Human Spirit?[/quote] No more than you can prove there is. Regardless, this is NOT a thread about religion. That's starting up on another thread. [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
[quote]The fundamental problem with Republicans and Democrats is that they both back a concentration of power. The Democrats prefer the government and the Republicans prefer big business. Neither should be trusted[/quote] With that I agree with you 100%.
[quote]That person could easily get investment capital and start an effects house with lots of employees and work making visual effects for movies. But that doesn't make the CEO good at business economics.[/quote] And it doesn't mean he isn't able to do both though. My focus for the past decade, for example. has been as a content creator in my personal life and as a businessman and entrepreneur professionally. I have been fortunate to be successful in five differe
[quote]while Excalpius may claim to have worked for several companies that made lots of money, t[/quote] Actually, I have worked for, created, built, owned, and have bought and sold many companies over the course of 25 years as a businessman. For some reason, people think I am a younger because I remain an idealist. I'm actually older than Brad and Island Dog if their profile ages are accurate.
[quote]BTW, for the record, it wasn't Nancy Reagan who did seances. It was Hillary Clinton.[/quote] And I held Hillary accountable for the same mumbo jumbo in my earlier post. For precisely that reason. Ignorance is ignorance.
[quote]I would think that the President Elect has much to learn.[/quote] You're quoting the Drudge Report. Really?! Is that what amounts to journalism to you? I haven't quoted huffpo or anyone other than MSM, including Fox, with citations.
[quote]1. I want you to explain why 435 people in congress are better qualified to spend that money than I, who earned it, am. [/quote] Um, I shouldn't have to explain that THIS is our system of government. If you want complete laissez fair capitalism, you might want to try moving operations to Russia. Ironic isn't it? Regardless, I believe the next administration will be better than the last, and will guide the congress better than the past. I bel
Frogboy, you spent a lot of time making assumptions and listing off business 101 issues. I don't feel this thread is about teaching everyone about business affairs, etc. etc. But to make things crystal clear... I have built LLCs (like the one in November), S-Corps, and C-Corps. I have been the founder/President/CEO handling day-to-day operations for most of them. I've been the Chairman of the Board for more than one. Some of these companies have come and go
[quote]Nancy Reagan DID do the whole spiritual mumbo jumbo thing. (insults edited out) Better re-read what she beleived and did, [/quote] I cited the references in the earlier post. [quote] Hey Genius! Using Astrology is not holding seances. Of is making a speech in the Greek Parthenon, having a toga party? Your logic would dictate it was.[/quote] And again, you're saying I said things I didn't say. And, for the record, h
[quote]You have it backwards. When liberals start walking the walk, you can claim the above. Until such time, they are the me me me - with your money.[/quote] They can't do any worse with our money than the GOP has over the past 8 years. I believe they will handle it sanely with an eye on everyone's needs, not just their rich friends and patrons. And if they don't they I will be one to call them out. But based on what they do or don't do, not based on your fears of
[quote]it seems to me to be an examle of your inability to say you were wrong about anything in your insistence that Obama did not make a gaff here. [/quote] I think if you look back you will see that I have admitted I was in error at least twice when I have been corrected.
[quote]Mrs. L.: Good for you! Absolutely correct about the REAL issues (don't know much about yout scriptures). I guess politics are calming down...religion is next. Nothing like a non-contentious topic. LOL.[/quote] Oh goody! A new topic. [e digicons]:D[/e]
[quote]Bible = story. Bible != reality. I don't know why people takes this nonsense crap as reality. 9 headed monster?[/quote] Remember that 1/2 of all human beings are average intelligence or less. When you include the poorly educated in that mix you can easily see why such ridiculous con games like Nostradamus prophecies, tarot cards, astrology, speaking to the dead, ghosts, the loch ness monster, big foot, UFOs, and, of course, all man-made religions ar
[quote]I fear that Obama just might be the anti-christ. [/quote] Careful, your mythological ignorance is showing. [e digicons]:D[/e]
BTW, the forums are REALLY fast right now. I hope it's permanent and not just because I'm the only one here. [e digicons]:grin:[/e]
[quote]Come on now,[/quote] Yes, come on now. Who gives a crap about this?! Don't we have more important things...you know ISSUES to be debating...like the: Economy War in Iraq War in Afghanistan Osama bin Laden still free Wall Street rip-off of taxpayers and homeowners Health Care crisis Constitutional crises involving torture, rendition, executive usurpation of power, revocation of habeus corpus Lack of high
[quote]Sorry, but your argument so far is not moving me at all, and I'm on opposite position from Brad! That shows how weak your argument is so far, if you can't move someone that probably would side with you. So weak.[/quote] The post you are quoting from has nothing to do with my specific positions on economic matters, only in answering Brad's question regarding my bona fides. I hope that clears it up for you. [quote]I don't care if you have been a trillionire twice, i
[quote] Wealth gets spread around regardless. The question is who is deciding how the wealth is spread. Right-wingers believe that the people who earn the money are more competent to spread the money than 435 people in Washington DC.[/quote] What you seem to have missed if that the people you speak of HAVE been "in charge" and they've mucked everything up but good. They bought and paid the congressman from both sides and got everything they wished. They had a complet
[quote]I dont' mean to be skeptical but I would love to hear the name of the "MUCH" larger company you ran because given what you've written, and I mean no disrespect on this, I can't imagine you have ever run a company of any significant size given your understanding of business economics. I don't mean that based on being liberal or conservative but rather your misunderstanding of economics in general. [/quote] Brad, you have the mind and experience of a small businessman in the mi