I thought that at least you should have some kind of collection of signatures that shows you are supported by enough people. You also have to be an AMERICAN
Lecrayon
Frogoy, you can choose the person that is put forward by the party. You can't vote for your neighbour to be president, unless he/she has established a party.
The Netherlands are not quite against the US. We have provided the anti-scud weaponry to Turkey. Netherlands government would not take part in military actions against Iraq, unless there is consensus in the UN. There isn't. We take part in military action in Afghanistan though. Even though we are a small country and highly outnumbered by the people of the US it should not make a difference when it comes to feeling powerful. I have yet to see a government that felt very powerful that would still
The thing is, whether you are pro-US or anti_US, it shouldn't really matter. But somehow it does affect us. I find that sad. And then people tend to give qualifications to each other. In trade you get sanctioned or some other measures are taken. When we speak of freedom, there really isn't any because one always wants to have its way. There is the difficulty. Gee, this thread goes quick. We might get along perfectly well together Frogboy, and I think you are an easy going person, but somehow whe
Frogboy, our socialistic society is a democracy too. In our country we have more than two parties, and the outcome of our elections make parties to negotiate about the policies and forming of the government. I agree with Thibaud, but it is useless. Europe hasn't been happy with your president since he was elected, he has managed since his presidency to decay the goodwill the US has built since WW2. A president that says: Anyone that is not with us is against us, and then I see people react the s
Yes. Friendship can go beyond the love stage. It has been reached by many.
I think it's time to accept that everyone has his opinion. Apart from one person that states things in a pompous way, it's a good debate with factfinding and links. However, everyone can make up their own mind and choose sides, or choose not to choose side and stay neutral. I agree with Paxx and Thibault, but also accept Frogboys point of view. However, with polls saying so many people support this or that may vary from hour to hour, and isn't really a motive to choose a certain path. Like Paxx
20 thousand kids a year...350.000 Iraqi's killed by the allies during the gulfwar in a few months...lets see...that's about 17,5 years until that total is reached. I know I know, I have to stay out of this. But I just couldn't resist to put some other figures against it.
A logical conclusion would then be that democracy doesn't work
Have played a bit with settings and it looks like these buttons use default button 0 in the presets of SkinStudio, and Font colour 0 in the presets. Somehow the fonts aren't manipulated by the classical bar font and colour settings....Maybe it is of any info...
At least one can state his/her opinion here, and it can be useful to read others thoughts and beliefs and maybe you learn and adopt a few
I have filled in all the colours, which are non-black and somehow the buttons display the right font with the outline defined as well, but a black fontcolour.........hmmmmmm
Thnks Fuzzzy, I'll try again.
Am I right that the buttons displayed in the discussion window and the skins and themes window are related to the taskbar buttons you can define in skintudio? And how are the fontcolours related to that particular buttons? I can't seem to let them work just as the taskbar buttons <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb
http://bulletin.ninemsn.com.au/bulletin/EdDesk.nsf/All/01A33C10272BF7A2CA256CE500837A10
I think I won't say any cynical comments...There has been one sentence going through my mind for weeks now. It was in the race for the US presidency when GB answered to the Iraq question: Dictatorship is wrong, unless I am the dictator ofcourse. It was a sick joke. <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/sb.gif" border=0
Indeed!
Big thank you to the WB developing team, it's solved
Bugger...I am dutch...Well I hoe they will find the solution quick
Trying to implement the new WB4 features got me into trouble with the control panel display. Classical display works fine, but when I try the XP display I get: DUI parser message: parse error "p" at line 1. Does anybody have a clue? I have tried other WB with the WB4 features and they all give me the same error <BR
to both <img src="http://images.stardock.com/images/smiles/s
what everybody said..
She has a point with repetitive abstracts though. Glassy spheres, pipes, hoses, in blues, greens, greys, oranges...spikes...I know, my taste is not the average, but I get quickly desinterested when I look at some. I had a dispute with Jafo long ago, but he is actually a great help for this site and as such I appreciate his efforts and time. It shouldn't be a big deal if you can't find some that will stay for a long time on your puter. There are lots of other sites within the community that can p
43 still, turning 44 in April. Won't call me a skinner. It's a luxury thing to me and great fun.