[quote]Thank you for claryfing Druidblue. Sorry for being mean, but being a republican and a supporter for the Iraq war I often find my self at odds with my friend(how is a demorcrat), and at school how are mostly all Obama fans. Also sorry for my spelling errors, I really dont care unless it is something really glaring and makes me look stupid. You are correct that there are some Republicans that I dont like, and some Democrats I do like (like Hillary Clintion). But let me state that I think Mc
[quote]The US has become like the Roman empire. The government is corrupt; it no longer serves the people. We have military stationed in 100s of countries. Government has become bloated and we have overextended ourselves.And by supplying weapons to terrorist nations such as Israel, the US has made lots of enemies. We invade other countries; depose their leaders and manipulate their governments. The US helped to overthrew the lawful and democratically elected government in Iran shortly after WW2
Bio:No Information Gender:No InformationHome Page:No Information Age:18 years old Location:No Information Interests:No Information that is what made me think you were 18, your profile. being thqat your not a kid then i guess your just a nut case.. tell ya what, with so much anti american hatred what say I buy you a plain ticket to afganistan, let you go trian with your buddies for awhile, then I will be glad to commit a few American War Crimes directly on you.
[quote]I am sick of people that dont know what they are talking about stating "fact"In this case arguing with historical documents and President comments of the time.US doesnt commit warcrimes?http://deoxy.org/wc/warcrime.htmUS Doesnt commit warcrimes?Why did bush pardon himself over any warcrimes he may have helped commit or ordered during his tenue as President?US doesnt commit warcrimes on a regular basis or intend to?http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2001/aug/17/usa.warcrimesWhy did the US con
@ghostwes I told you that I needed time to gather information that was not suspect. I do not keep at my fingertips the sources of all the information that I have. [quote]Given the ridiculous claims you've been posting in this forum, I won't be holding my breath, but OK, whatever. Maybe you know more about this than the CIA does.[/quote] As far as knowing more than the CIA does; I imagine that I have now demonstrated that in keeping with your remark, that I do in fact k
[quote]Aaaaaand here comes ignorance about foreign countries!Yeah...this thread is not going to end well.[/quote] Um, if ya give me enough time I will attempt to go and create the most ignorent remark I can about China, but first I need to contact a few people over there to make sure that I do not inadvertently make a remark that is factual.
US going to war over loss of a battle ship.. Spanish american war 1898 Triggered by the sinking of the Maine. (later proven to have been an explosion in the boiler room and not an attack)
[quote]You also stated--again, as a fact--that he was one of the embassy hostage-takers. As far as anyone can tell, there is no evidence of this and the experts, including the CIA and even the hostages themselves don't think he was. But you still feel comfortable stating this as a fact.[/quote] One former hostage, retired U.S. Navy Captain Donald Sharer, told U.S. NBC television on 29 June that he remembers Ahmadinejad on two specific occasions. Please show me where this man wi
[quote]Please don't feed the trolls. They have a nasty habit of becoming more aggresive, less coherent and may multiply.[/quote] Now that is worth repeating!
[quote]We're humans, we're meant to kill each other. If we werenn't we wouldn't be so good at it. Everyone, every goverment, and every nation has commited mistakes. If you deny that good for you. Your perfect. You should rule the world. Oh, wait, someone you know, are related to, or have befriended isn't perfect, oh damn, guess it's time for whoever they wronged to come and kill your family since YOU ARE AS RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR ACTIONS AS YOU ARE FOR YOUR GOVEREMENTS, ECT ECT. Well, see you in h
[quote]Spacepony - you got me with the Al Sharpton reference. I try to keep abreast of international politics and figures, but had not heard of Rev. Sharpton before and had to Google him. I take it he is very famous in the US - we have not heard of him here in China. Well, I haven't anyway. Regarding labour unions, it is a beginning movement here in China. Our unions are not strong - and we are constantly criticised by the international companies here when we attempt to unionize who see it as an
I am just wondering how many people who are into science fiction got introduced to it by reading the original masters, Jules Verne and H.G. Wells. You don’t hear much about them anymore. I know it has been some 140 years ago that Verne was in his apex, and about 100 for Wells but they are the ones who started this whole genera.
[quote]Yeah I just hope with everyone going crazy we aint forcing them for a fast release because this game needs some content added as well . Looking at some of the other threads and the way its going I think its now going to be harder for them to just take their time and do an awesome patch.[/quote] They are known for ignoring pressure to put out something that is not ready. I doubt they will do anything but say "your gonna have to wait, sorry" until they have it right.
[quote]Please provide me a single example of an article that was “known to be edited by the us government”You're welcome.. The only thing on there was the fbi removing an aeril photo of quantonamo.. nothing on the government editing an artical Please provide me a link to the United Nations war crimes tribunal decision concerning this.No one can. USA has refused to be a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC). Guess why? The court I do beleave would have been a
[quote]The attack was a direct declaration of war on all mankind, the sole purpose of the act was to kill as many people as possible and gain publicity for a pro Nazi movement. The reason the attack was directed toward American targets was that New York is recognized as the preeminent center of international culture and the Pentagon as the preeminent center of military power in the world. The attack was not directed just at the USA, it was directed at all thinking people of the world who yearn f
I thought they were just in reruns... I am really out of touch on this one... AND NO FRACKN REMARKS FROM THE PENUT GALLERY ABOUT ME BEING OUT OF TOUCH ON MANY THINGS, unless of cource you have some peanuts to toss my way.. [quote]Knock off the insults, everyone. Psychoak's been warned.thats good , but we all go overbord sometimes so I am not that angry. But if he did it again then I would be angry. [/quote] would we like you when
[quote]SpacePonyYou might want to check your facts, including Wiki links, I would suggest you look at the list of wiki articles known to be edited by the US govement[/quote] Oh what a cop out. Please provide me a single example of an article that was “known to be edited by the us government” [quote].Funny how apparently since I dislike the USA I am actually a terrorist.[/quote] Cop out. Who said that? Where? When? Please show me [quote]SpacePonyYou may also WI
[quote] Within the Chinese Communist party, there are unfortunately some government officials who are corrupt, who embezzle, who are not looking after the common people's interests and we should make attempts to bring these people to light.[/quote] Umm sounds like your talking about the republicans [quote] If you never hear from me again, then I've been eaten by a big Communist red guard Chairman Mao monster.[/quote] I saw him just this morning, oh wait, that was our v
[quote]Ok, have gathered some material about my claims.http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2005/7/992E9294-D81D-4093-A38B-20DC9642013B.htmlAn article from July 2005, ie. before most of these claims were refuted. Uh huh. Think we'll just dismiss that one out of hand and move on. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_surrounding_Mahmoud_AhmadinejadA wikipedia page showing that the controversy exists. Um OK. You realize this was already obvious to anyone reading this thread, including, I
[quote]Now the current President Mahmūd Ahmadinejād, was one of the student leaders involved in the taking of the embassy back in 1979. Most people do not recall this as it has not really been brought up all that much.Look, do you think you could give us a reputable link or... something... for all these "facts" that you post? There is no proof that he was involved in the hostage situation. Even the CIA doesn't seem to think he was involved, and if there was ever an organization that would claim
[quote]Now the current President Mahmūd Ahmadinejād, was one of the student leaders involved in the taking of the embassy back in 1979. Most people do not recall this as it has not really been brought up all that much.Look, do you think you could give us a reputable link or... something... for all these "facts" that you post? There is no proof that he was involved in the hostage situation. Even the CIA doesn't seem to think he was involved, and if there was ever an organization that would claim
Ok let’s get a few things straightened out here. Q: Did The United States Nuke Japan? A: Yes! Q: Was the motive to kill as many Japanese as possible? A: No, it was to save as many people as possible on both sides, It was estimated that it would cost about two to four million lives on both sides if The United States launched an invasion into Japan. Not counting the destruction of the remaining infrastructure. So, it was decided that by dropping the bomb the Japanese governme
Why do we in The United States have a hard on for Iran and for Mahmūd Ahmadinejād in particular? Can you say Hostages? Can you say 444 days? Sure you can. Now the current President Mahmūd Ahmadinejād, was one of the student leaders involved in the taking of the embassy back in 1979. Most people do not recall this as it has not really been brought up all that much. Do not underestimate this man. The press often pokes fun at him but he did not get where he is by being stu
[quote]This is the basis of my theories: If you tax the wealthy, then there is not incentive to become wealthy.Uh, no? Why would it? The basis of a higher-tax for the wealthy would be to maintain a linear curve of income tax, so that while the wealthy stay wealthy they pay more in proportion to their earnings. It's not as if the wealthy will get taxed back into a middle-class bracket, it's that they'll pay more because they earn more.[/quote] No he is right! as long as they insist on ta
Sins Forums