IMO, everything about the whole modern/flat look is hideous. It reminds me of the interface of a child's play computer I saw back in the late nineties. I guess they've decided to cut back on graphic artist costs. If Win 10 allows skinning, I would buy a product that completely changes everything about the gui. Hint and wink, SD....
I agree that GC3 galaxy feels restrictive relative to GC2.
Does anyone know when Win 10 will be available "for free", or was the announcement far in advance of the actual offer?
Stardock Forums
[quote who="psychoak" reply="5" id="3516472"] looks like there are way too many old farts on the internet. [/quote] Someone has to keep the young whipper snappers in line... [e digicons]:)[/e] But, we need some criteria for "old fart" status. Here's one. You're old if you've ever played this game. [e digicons];)[/e] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pong
How about the paperclip?
Downloaded and installed as well. The title-bar issue seems to be fixed. Although, with some skins, Windows explorer isn't displaying properly. I'm sure that has more to do with the individual skin than WB, but I'm curious if anyone else has experienced this. Also, my system start up time seems to have increase a bit.
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ze9xAIqZszw[/video]
[video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSKBoO5hBHk[/video]
Yea, I saw that, but it seems different from what I reported. In the bug I mentioned, there were no floating gates, and the castle wasn't turned in any direction. It just wasn't there at all. [quote who="Gilmoy" reply="4" id="3514868"] Quoting Borg999, reply 3 Has the SK disappearing castle b
Has the SK disappearing castle bug been fixed? It's a game breaking issue. http://forums.sorcererking.com/460153/page/1/#3513625
Just in case someone else hasn't mentioned these methods: http://malwaretips.com/blogs/remove-browser-redirect-virus/
Just a question for SD. Given the numerous spelling and grammatical errors that have been identified in LH and now SK, I was wondering if SD uses a subcontractor in India to do a portion of the XML coding?
It has been my personal experience that most company's that claim to be meritocracy are in reality operating under the same old company politics as usual. It's just something they put in their marketing/PR material
Add Edit: Lost and Found - The last part of the sentence is poorly worded. Instead of saying "by way of thanks" at the very end, I think it it would sound better to replace it with "to show his gratitude"
SorcererKing Forums
So, I'm near the end game and about to go after the SK. When I get there, I find the castle gone, and the SK just standing there out in the open. I tried to attack him anyway, but there is a invisible barrier preventing me from getting near him. As a side note, near the end game, the red line of the doomsday counter would completely disappear, even though it was more than half way through. <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/jmw8gcdfqo950hk/whereisSKC
In the second paragraph, after the comma, it should say "Lost & Found", not Lost & found. https://www.dropbox.com/s/ctbce7stijubpd6/Lost_Found%20Typo.png?dl=0 Aspects of lightning : The description says "provides +1 cold damage to weapon". It should say +1 lightning damage. <a href="https://www.dropbox.com/s/iow
Well the premise behind this is that he wants your faction to thrive.. "the more life the better". How big your faction grows may (or at least it should) have an impact on the doomsday counter.
The archivist and the onyx throne: One gives 1 lore +1 per shard connected to the city, and the other gives 1 skill +1 per shard connected to the city. On a typical map, the most shards you can have attached to a city, just by city growth alone, is one or two. To get more shards attached to a city, you would have to build one or more pioneers to expand to a shard outside the city area. Given the lackluster benefit of these facilities, I think it would be a no-brainier to use the pione
SorcererKing Forums
[quote quoting="post"] Certain abilities like arcane arrow- they do less damage than the mage's normal attack, and cost mana. This is true for at least the battle mage. It might be overpowered to let them scale, so unsure how to solve this. [/quote] Step scaling might be a solution. So instead of increasing with every level, the ability would increase with every other level, or every three levels, for example.
1. A fiery dart strikes for 0 fire damage . That zero is not correct. https://www.dropbox.com/s/fe18s3pg7nr8cbw/flame%20dart%20zero.png?dl=0 2. The text should read "You hand the pieces over to a grateful minister. https://www.dropbox.com/s/x0z5h6d3t1wfmya/Pariden.png?dl
SorcererKing Forums
Since all sovereigns have a variation of that branch in their skill tree, It's not unique or special. I suggest that the number of spells that can be used in battle should be a function of level, instead of taking up a slot in the skill tree. And then use that branch for additional unique abilities and skills.
[quote who="Cyclone_Jack" reply="8" id="3511757"] The UI seems much improved as well, and the terrain is a bit more crisp. And, most importantly, the unit selection and movement squares are much more visible. The art and UI team(s) have really done a good job. [/quote] Yea, I agree with this. Maybe it's my old eyes, but in some games, when the scenery is too busy, the units almost appear to blend into/become camouflage with the back
Thats not really a good analogy. My request is not the equivelent of asking comany A to sell me a product from compamy B. Rather, I'm asking company A to change a feature on one of its own products. And yes, I did bring this issue up on a Steam forum. When I did a seach, I found a number of threads that were already discussing the exact same topic and expressing disappointment with it. I brought the issue up on this forum as well because I fel
It seems to me that the gaming industry is taking the position that every customer is a potential pirate, and that's just sad.
So you're saying the consumer doesn't have the right to express disappointment with a product or service? Are you effectively saying that the actions and choices made by the gaming industry is beyond reproach? If that view is commonly held, it would seem that the gaming industry has an entitlement issue of its own... which is ironic considering how often the term entitlement gamer is used in this forum.</span