I really wish these media outlets would stop saying No Multiplayer is a "Con" or "Bad" in their reviews. When a conscience choice was made not to include multiplayer (especially when that forum post explains it so well), you can't mark points off a game for that. It's like taking points away from Half-Life 2 because it didn't have RPG elements. If a developer does not include a specific feature and they have good reason not to, the reviewer needs to
the_culture
I really wish these media outlets would stop saying No Multiplayer is a "Con" or "Bad" in their reviews. When a conscience choice was made not to include multiplayer (especially when that forum post explains it so well), you can't mark points off a game for that. It's like taking points away from Half-Life 2 because it didn't have RPG elements. If a developer does not include a specific feature and they have good reason not to, the reviewer needs
I really wish these media outlets would stop saying No Multiplayer is a "Con" or "Bad" in their reviews. When a conscience choice was made not to include multiplayer (especially when that forum post explains it so well), you can't mark points off a game for that. It's like taking points away from Half-Life 2 because it didn't have RPG elements. If a developer does not include a specific feature and they have good reason not to, the reviewer needs
There is a typographical error under Trade when choosing your starting abilities as a Terran. This is how it reads now: "By improving your Trade Ability, the about of money you receive..." This is how it should read: "By improving your Trade Ability, the amount of money you receive..." I know it's nit-picky but I worked two years as a QA Tester/Project Lead and I can't stop!!! <img src="http://images