I agree with this, and would like to add that I would appreciate that at the end of the game, when you go back to the states & look at the numbers, you can see actual population votes for each candidate as opposed to the percentages. Otherwise, I'm loving the game and the always excellent continued support of a product by Stardock. Keep up the amazing work guys!
Hello, I love the game, it's very fun and exactly what I was looking for! I hope there's enough interest in this for upcoming feature upgrades and expansions, though I know interest will most certainly wane when December hits. Anyway, I would like to request to have the actual poll values at the end of the election - so, along with say, 50% to 49%, having the actual number of voters for each available to see. Keep up the great work Brad and everyone on the team, I'
Maybe it's just me, but I think $9 seems like a bit of sticker shock to some. Again, maybe I'm way off here - but it seems like the feeling is "for $9, content must be greater than x" - whereas, I think, if you priced it at $5, and as long as there were at least 2 dozen or so new features, no one would complain or balk at the price. I'd like to throw my hat in the ring as saying what everyone else has said: I'd pay $9 for a decent amount o
I tend to agree that single player should be more focused on. I've dabbled in online random play with FPSes and the like...it really is a crapshoot. Civ 4 though - man, I can't live without playing my partner at home on the LAN, because it's seamless and perfect. But then again, Soren put that in from the very beginning, and really, it was the *main* focus of development for Civ 4, because it was so buggy and half-assed in 3's expansions.
PolMach Forums
GalCiv2 Forums