Starstriker1

Starstriker1

Joined Member # 2444307
0 Posts 14 Replies 10,250 Reputation

Well, the expansions do add a lot of complexity. However, you might as well just jump into the deep end, since a lot of things are streamlined in TA for new players (like, for instance, automated ship designing) I'd suggest sandbox as well. Make sure to set the AI to truly brain dead difficulties for your first game, just so you can get a hang of the economy and such. The biggest changes introduced in the expansions are the hostile environments, spying, and multiple tech trees... so I'd

8 Replies 5,343 Views

The Korath are the only civ with the spore ships. It is, in fact, their super ability: the ability to take planets relatively painlessly. I can understand why it's frustrating, but have you tried countering it? Spore ships are usually easy to take out if you have interceptors and/or sensor filled ships to catch them, and they can't do anything at all if your planets have a ship in orbit. Just put a ship in orbit of every planet you own, and they cannot invade or spore you without first

10 Replies 13,938 Views

I'd like to see the luck ability removed from combat considerations. As it stands, 25% luck is like a 12.5% weapon bonus that also gives you special events and lucky finds. Luck should be a random, roll of the dice ability instead of a reliable boost to your ships fighting ability... let alone a boost that is a more efficient use of your ability points than putting the same points into weapons!

274 Replies 740,638 Views

I find that the Arceans are best suited to turtling. Buildings that increase your soldiering abilities, space cannons (which also improve morale), and weather control all do wonders in that regard. One thing you might want to try bartering for are Ion Engines and Impulse Drive. Ion engines are small and cheap, which is a big advantage in ship building, and the impulse drives (which you can't normally research) negate your disadvantage. There's no getting around it, though, the

29 Replies 32,878 Views

Then I suspect that my definition of art (be it martial, visual, or audio) is a personal one... I always approach it with an eye towards constant improvement. And I'll disagree on another point: I don't think that we should accept imperfection. I don't think that paralysis or frustration as you describe is helpful either, but flaws should be taken note of with the intent of doing better next time. It's the only way to improve! :D

15 Replies 4,992 Views

I'm totally guilty of this as well. Taken to its logical extreme, I find the same mindset also stops me from trying new things, as I'm generally terrified of screwing up. Still, I find that perfectionism is actually a helpful trait for many of the things I enjoy. Programming without putting a lot of thought into your work beforehand tends to result in all sorts of pain down the road, for instance. And for me, my definition of "art" is something where you are in pursuit of perfection...

15 Replies 4,992 Views

Well, the attacker is SUPPOSED to have a huge advantage, but I agree, it'd be nice to have the option! Since we're on the subject of wishlists, heres some defensive tactics I'd like to see: Scorched earth policy - Gives a large bonus to your defenders, but the planet will have reduced quality and loss of improvements (regardless of who wins) Guerrilla warfare - If the opponent succeeds in the invasion, all improvements are destroyed. If possible, you might even want to add a pro

6 Replies 6,659 Views

Well, let's not knock conservatism too hard here. I'm going to use the analogy of a boat here... liberalism (in the sense of being pro-change) is the engine, conservativism (resistance to change) is the anchor, and the driver is the "will of the people". This article basically asks why you would want that anchor slowing down your perfectly good boat. Well, I'm just going to go out on a limb here and establish the fact that pretty much everyone already knows: the "will of the peo

24 Replies 68,773 Views

Another possible justification: the tiles listed are areas where the GOVERNMENT is allowed to place their mammoth industrial complexes and research cities. The rest of it is being used by private landowners, cities, or any other number of justifications... the only thing the government cares about is which areas are practical to put their shipyards, top secret research labs, etc. Furthermore, you could just regard the whole "tiles" thing as an abstraction... the actual buildings aren't built on

26 Replies 23,084 Views

...especially since you've expressed an interest in modding. TA, aside from having unique techs per race and all sorts of other fun goodies, also comes with editors for maps, scenarios, tech trees, components, and a few others... a total of 6, I believe. ...plus, who can argue with the requisite massive AI updates? :D

8 Replies 14,609 Views

I'd emphasis something that Artysim brought up. Having it reviewed independently is important, but the public availability of the results, method, data, assumptions and inferences has to be guaranteed for it to really be science. Stuff that comes out of think tanks (aside from not always being peer reviewed) tends to also only publish a portion of the research, and that compromises the validity of the results.

20 Replies 16,750 Views

No, it does not. That's how you'd EXPECT it to work, but what it actually does is increase the maximum amount of your monthly income you're allowed to reallocate to buying spies. So instead of being able to spend 25% of your income on agents, you can put 50% in! Nice if you have the money to spare, I suppose, but it's overall a blatantly useless ability. Me? I'd make it so that it decreases the amount of cash required per agent, which would actually be useful. That said, espion

7 Replies 10,491 Views

DethAdder, theres a huge difference between a 3000ghz computer with a graphics card and a 1500ghz one with an embedded card. :P ToA does have a much lower MEMORY footprint, which is how the new immense galaxy size came around. As for CPU usage... I don't know. The graphics had a large overhaul, which might contribute to it somewhat... they don't use as much memory, but the ships DO look much more detailed. How many AIs are there in your game? The AIs have had a ridiculous amoun

8 Replies 6,130 Views

1)Changing the mousewheel zoom to something like what sins or supreme commander has, so that it zooms in on the mouse cursor instead of the center of the screen 2)When setting the exit point on worlds, make it so that pressing the button doesn't try to set it to the tile you're currently pointing at, but to the last VALID tile you pointed at! It's very aggravating to try and set the exit points from a high zoom because you're seeing the highlighted tile where you're thinking you're setting i

274 Replies 740,638 Views

Technologies have always become more expensive the higher you go. This is especially true of industry and research technologies. Fortunately, with the research techs, you have the option of researching the new buildings, building them, and then using that new researching capacity to finished the more expensive follow up tech. As for research strategies? Varies by race now that everyone has unique tech trees. Experiment, mess around, and see what works.

5 Replies 2,174 Views

Besides, to have a terror star you basically need to be near their level technologically, at which point the more productive option is just to crush them and bombard them with transports to take their juicy, high quality world.

16 Replies 57,549 Views

Eeeeeexcellent. Looking forward to playing the final AIs when the final release rolls around. Out of curiosity, how much post release support is planned for TA? I understand you're busy with god knows how many projects at once, but I have to wonder if the AI is going to get even BETTER sometime post release... ;)

17 Replies 41,226 Views

Draginol, I agree with almost everything you said. However, I think you're delving into an entirely different issue with your TF2 example. In that case, the players who don't buy the new class WOULD be hurt by the existence of it, as it would be fundamentally altering the game balance. As a competitive multiplayer game, it's tough to say that giving people who pay more a new class (with unique abilities that give new strategies) does not harm the people who do not buy access to it. You're essent

207 Replies 494,272 Views