You can use FF (or most any other browser) to read them in the meantime. But yeah MSWord is notorious for posting bad html that IE chokes on.
Mumblefratz
[quote]Getting back to Mumble, if you can refer me to posts on our forums where users are referring to other people as scrotum suckers (tea baggers) feel free to let me know.[/quote]If you put it like that I suppose it is a bit more extreme than calling someone stupid. However my use of the term was not directed at any specific person (unlike idiot and stupid which are constantly being directed at individuals *personally* on this site). Also I was unaware that the act involved actual suc
[quote]If you thought I was serious, lets just pretend you didn't and were just carrying the joke on.[/quote]I got no clue what you're talking about and I'm not particularly interested in coaxing your meaning out of you. For someone whose conversation tends to decay towards that of Zyxpsilon you'd think you would at least *try* to make yorself understood.
[quote]Ah, the loaded question now![/quote]Because that's the only question you ask me. Look at your reply #142 and every word you said could easily apply to yourself. The only difference between us is that my feelings of self worth are not all tied into a forum presence of the "great and all-powerful Oz" whereas that's *all* you are is a puffed up buffoon of a caricature of a person. But I tire of you and since I know how insistent you are about having the last word f
[quote]regardless of the dozen lies you have told around the forums already, right?[/quote]Have you stopped beating your wife yet?
[quote]Ah, good point. I withdraw my comment[/quote]You do realize that you have to lie down before you can be a doormat?
[quote]I'd be interested to know what term 'said in the other direction' you consider to be the equivalent.[/quote]None that I've noticed specifically in this thread but I'm talking about the site not the specific thread. Nor am I really interested in mining the multitude of threads on this forum whose sole intent is the denigration of the left for a suitable example. Not because no such example exists because there are countless such examples but because of the double standard there
[quote]It's up to you on how you want to comport yourself but I can say that everytime I see someone use the term "teabagger" when they know the connotations of it, it makes me lose a little respect for the person using the term.[/quote]Of that I have no doubt. But when the equivalent is said in the other direction not a word gets spoke. But then I'm sure you see no evidence of the double standard that exists in pretty much every thread on this site. Wel
[quote]April 1, and it was snowing San Diego County this morning.[/quote]I actually started a new job on April 1st, 1997 and overnight it had snowed about 2 feet in the Boston area. Not thinking that the place would be open but not being famliar with their cancellation policy and not knowing what else to do I went to work on what was supposed to be my first day. It was a pretty long commute from Concord, MA to Peabody, MA but there was very little traffic (naturally) and the plow
[quote]I fail to see how the ice extent being in decline over the last thirty years is an invalidation of the post.[/quote]I didn't say it did. As far as 2013 that seems to have been predicted by one group headed by Professor Wieslaw Maslowski who isn't someone that I've ever heard of before. Given that his prediction is only 3 years away I guess you won't have very long to wait to see if he was right or wrong. It's still conceivable that he could be right after all.
[quote]Not until 2012.[/quote][e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e] Thanks for the laugh.
[quote]Silly question, dj.[/quote][e digicons]:thumbsup:[/e] [quote]Mumbles, what is your take on this bit of news[/quote]Seems to be saying that Arctic ice had a bad Feburary but a good March. OK I can buy that as long as you don't try to make some momentous conclusion from it. Watts gets his graph from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) and makes a big fuss over crossing the "normal" ice extent line. However this "normal" ice extent line is merely for the ave
[quote who="Dr Guy" reply="114" id="2580283"]...[/quote] You *still* talking to yourself?
[quote]So you'll be wearing your bib this November?[/quote]No, I'll be voting progressive, the same as always. But speaking of eating their young it will be interesting to see how the teabaggers will fare versus more normal Republicans and how well either side will emerge from what appears will become some very bitter primaries for you. Remember NY23? In any case while it's inevitable some margin will be lost in both house and senate an actual change in majority is unlikely an
[quote]Such systems can get by in Europe because they don't live unhealthy lifestyles on par as we do.[/quote]The way that the French smoke and drink is hardly healthy. Without the fortuitous coincidence that red wine is good for you the French "lifestyle" wouldn't be noticeably "healthier" than that of the US.
Earlier in this thread I posted a link to an article entitled Waterloo, authored by David Frum who among other things *was* a "fellow" at the tobacco lobbyist cum global warming denialist, American Enterprise Institute . I say *was* because apparently the Waterloo piece sufficiently annoyed his "fellows" over at AEI that they fired him. Well not so much fired him as asked if he would consider
[quote]Just because you're enjoying your assraping doesn't mean you will bleed any less in the end. [/quote]Damn you! Just when you've pissed me off the most, you have to go and make me laugh. It's hard to keep a good hate going when you're laughing. But you do know that you are an asshole don't you?
Damn Forum. Duplicate Post.
[quote]Please don't forget that many of us Southron folks who love the phrase "War of Northern Aggression" would also have been staunch, if terrified, abolitionists back in the day. We just don't like the damn Yankees and no-account cowboys from out West conspiring to label our region as the national homeland of ignorance. Reconstruction happened down here, but Jim Crow was nation-wide.[/quote]I knew you'd show up here sooner or later. And yes I do realize that your abolitionist credentials a
[quote]Hint - Wincustomize.com just turned 9.[/quote]Then you must be familar with the oldest thread in the database. https://forums.galciv2.com/51 Of course your experience predates the database but as far as "recorded history" on these forums that's pretty much defined by the database. There are outlier forums that precede the unification of all the forums into one consistent database. The GalCiv 1 site for example (a very
[quote]I can't help but take offense to this, I live in the south but I could careless; its over and what has been done is done.[/quote]Generalizations are always guaranteed to be wrong because they are never 100% true. However the reason that people continually use generalizations is because they *are* true more often then not. Assuming that the age in your profile is correct then you're probably too young to care much about anything (yet another generalization to which you may or ma
Here's a "quick perspective" for you.
The key criteria of a war that makes it a civil war is that it is between two opposing goups of citizens of the same country. As far as which side is the usurper it is always the loser since the winner writes the history books. If you drive around in the US south it's pretty clear that many people are still fighting the Civil War or as they call it the War of Northern Aggression.
[quote who="myfist0" reply="1" id="2579546"]Off-topic[/quote]Actually there are two. https://forums.galciv2.com/forum/412 is the Off-topic forum that is shared with most of Stardock's forum sites. https://forums.galciv2.com/forum/349 is the Off-Topic forum that exists only on the GalCiv2, Joe User and Stardock sites. As to "what happened" to it, nothing as far as I kno
[quote]AP International[/quote]Would it have hurt you to include the link without having to be asked each time?