Ouch. Glad I'm still at 362.
JcRabbit
[quote who="psychoak" reply="181" id="3624447"] Clearly, the ethical answer is to send it towards the five people working. If they're not smart enough to get out of the way, your only hope is that they didn't reproduce before nature took it's natural course. [/quote] Lol. Why am I not surprised your answer would be something like that? ;-) Anyway, in the real problem the five people will not be able, for whatever reason, to hear the train coming on
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="178" id="3624435"]At different times...unless you feel a specific action (or inaction) can be good and evil simultaneously...[/quote] Ouch. This one will take things waaaaay off-topic, but... I think that, first, it depends on the intention. Second, yes, there are actions (perhaps all actions?) that have both a good and an evil component, especially in an non-perfect world such as this where every resource is limited (so you cannot eat your c
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="9" id="3624437"]Slacker! Get back to work! [/quote] Ahah! Hey, I am! Was going to release v16.3 today - as a maintenance release to v16.2 - that fixed all known bugs, when everybody + their dog suddenly remembered to report some other so far unreported minor issues (minor or not, I *hate* bugs). :-P Well, better l
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="176" id="3624429"]Hmmm...a certain * cuniculus* comes to mind... [e digicons];)[/e] ...as 'good', of course. [e digicons]:grin:[/e] [/quote] AHAHAH! Nah, we're all sinners. Which is as it should be because that is the condition of being human, i.e.; creatures capable of duality (i.e.; being both good and evil at the same time, although in different degrees) instead of absolutes. It is this capability that allows u
It's not that A or B are evil, but their actions either are, or aren't, independent of their TRUE motivations. Plus, nobody and nothing in this world is 100% good or 100% evil. But if you look at the bigger picture, at all their recent actions and their consequences (or potential consequences) for EVERYBODY, you can pretty much have a good idea on where they stand on the good/evil scale. ;-)
[quote who="joeKnowledge" reply="6" id="3624376"]Totally forgot about WinStep. Its like Object Bar (that I loved before it went into the dustbin of coding history).[/quote] Yeah. That is because unlike Brad & Stardock I'm mainly a techie, so I totally suck at marketing. :-P Winstep has been around since late 1998 (i.e.; roughly the same year Stardock moved from OS/2 into Windows and WindowBlinds started to become popular). Many famous skinners (think Treetog, Essorant,
[quote who="ElanaAhova" reply="168" id="3624250"]Isaiah 5:20 "Woe to them that call evil good, and good evil ; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter." [/quote] [e digicons]5*[/e]
Man does not live on bread alone. In the worst of times, we all need something that helps us take our heads out of our misery, even if it's just for a short while - so we can recharge batteries and find the strength to keep going. You should know that, Moshi. :)
It really isn't nothing big... sometimes the current weather description is too long and that enables the 'scrolling ticker' mode so the text fits and you are able to read it all. When that happens a little bit of the text might overlap the icon - might not even be Tiggz oversight, I might have tinkered with the scrolling routine AFTER he made the theme and caused this.
I'm with Neil and the Doc here. :) They don't do the same thing at all: WindowBlinds skins other applications, Winstep is essentially a program launcher - and only skins itself. Winstep and WindowBlinds nicely complement each other, in fact, many Winstep themes are made to match existing WindowBlinds skins. Anyway, thanks for the compliment. [e digicons]|-)[/e]
If he's not used to editing Winstep theme configuration files it's best for him to wait for the Winstep Theme Builder to be released. Anyway, since the K-TEK4D theme is actually one of the themes that ships with Winstep, I might fix it myself. :)
[quote who="Neil Banfield" reply="385" id="3623559"]I think we have contacted them before, but if you are able to that would be most helpful.[/quote] My pleasure! Can you please send me a PM with the description of the problem you want me to pass on to them?
[quote who="GregII" reply="42" id="3623545"]I'll have to agree with you there. My only concern with it is that the Weather module text sometimes runs past it.[/quote] There is a setting for the skinner to use that prevents it from doing so.
[quote who="Neil Banfield" reply="381" id="3623542"]Do you use ESET AV?[/quote] Neil, if there is a problem with WB and ESET and you need to pass on a message to them please feel free to let me know: I'm on their beta tester's mailing list, which gives me privileged access to them.
[quote who="GregII" reply="40" id="3623518"]So what are your favorite themes currently?[/quote] Not so much favorite but themes that caught my eye because they are different. For instance: <img src="http://orig13.deviantart.net/d5c6/f/2015/102/5/7/cruzer_blade_xtreme_by_bleumart-d8oyk3i.jpg" alt="" width="1920" height="
[quote who="DaveBax" reply="32" id="3620011"]I did send an email and will post here if I receive an answer. I do know she really enjoyed making Winstep Themes and just didn't give it up because she was tired of it. I was teaching her Photoshop and she was really interested in it. So there is something else going on. Hopefully Mindy or if she isn't able someone else is checking her email and let me know.[/quote] I take it you haven't heard back from Mindy yet? Send
Funny thing is, here we are talking about these mega-pixel monitors when the most common screen resolution (at +- 31%) is... 1366x768. Immediately followed by 1920x1080 for 21.5% of users out there. Only 0.11% are blessed with 4K monitors ( 3840x2160 ).
Unfortunately I am still 'limping along' with three 30" monitors at 2560x1600 each and a nVidia GTX 690: The new 4K+ monitors now available seem great, but generally they have too much screen resolution for the actual monitor size, which makes everything look 'tiny'. As a result, most people enable high DPI settings on their systems, which basically works by magnifying everything. All
[quote who="psychoak" reply="150" id="3621912"]That any plans by that crowd would have had anything to do with the succeeding administrations actions a decade later is laughably preposterous.[/quote] Administrations come and go, true. But some 'things' always stay the same since they do not depend on the current administration. Besides, there was a reason why that plan was made. Just because it was a different administration, does not mean the reason was no longer valid - US f
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="148" id="3621904"]The world is flat because lots of people say so?[/quote] Damn! It isn't?! ;-) :)
[quote who="psychoak" reply="146" id="3621888"]The sheer absurdity of the revisionist history coming to this thread is mind blowing. Libya wasn't even a US concern, France and the UK spearheaded it through NATO and the UN, our wonderful president was just dumb enough to go along for the ride.[/quote] And I'm the one being accused of revisionism? Sarkozy would never have the balls to initiate or suggest an attack on Libya on his own, although the attack on Libya also serv
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="142" id="3621871"]As for the "not trusting Americans"? Your bias is showing. They don't trust "America" due to the NSA, etc. That is NOT "Americans". That is the government: The same government which needs to be watched by the citizens, to make sure it is in compliance with the Constitution.[/quote] Hey, not fair, you added this later. :) I'm not being biased. Just stating what I see around me. And yes, you're right, it&#
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="142" id="3621871"] Never said "Greatest" anywhere. Strawman argument, Jorge. [/quote] Not really. I was reacting to what was implied in your 'jealousy is what it is: The sincerest compliment.'. :-P [quote who="starkers" reply="141" id="3621868"]Yup, it's called selective invasions. Saddam had oil and other resources which could [and did] benefit the US....and then there's the strategic position for the US in the Middle East....
[quote who="DrJBHL" reply="139" id="3621854"]My responses also address the need of some to bash the USA. But then, jealousy is what it is: The sincerest compliment.[/quote] Hmmm, Doc. For many, many, years after WWII the world's view on Americans is that they were the 'good guys'. The nice smiley giants chewing gum, smoking cigarettes and giving chocolates to kids. Hollywood, Humphrey Bogart, Ava Gardner, cowboys and indians; the world was in love with America.