Does anyone actually know how to reduce the memory usage of iconX or is that just what I get? Seriously. Kudos to the real skinners out there, how do you find the time? Oh yeah I'm not interested in memos, dead horses or underpant comparisons ,no disrespect that probably makes me a noob or something, I know.Maybe even a retro, oldskool noob <img src="smiles/Wink.gi
Memory does become an issue if you do any serious audio or visual processing, that's when ram becomes premium . It would be nice not to have to shut down other (fun) processess that might start to interfere. Of course time and technological advancment will heal these issues, but it won't stop sarcasm.
[img]http://redtentacle.com/extra/IconXusage.jpg[/img] A picture says a thousand words. I'd just like to add that without customisation XP can look pretty ordinary and even a little shoddy so I really like that we have the option to change th UI, but sometimes it can affect memory usage whatever the [I]EXPERTS[/I] say. Some of us have other priorities so it would be nice if [B]IconX[/B] could optimise its efficiancy for the people who use it.
?
Longer files names are not stacking downwards as I would like, can I make the label size shorter horizontally so that they dont take up so much screen or run into the next icon label?? I Can't find a help file anywhere on this application. I have also resorted to making my own png backgrounds and replacing the small selection of nasty ones supplied, A check for update button would be nice too. <
WinCustomize Forums
Stardock Forums