OK. I can see you are continuing to edit your post. But I fail to see, still, how the information you provided in any way supports your assertion that it was not republicans or conservatives who came up with "Macacawitz". Can you provide a link or reference to the word being used by a non-conservative earlier than the link I provided to its use at The National Review on September 19? Can you provide a link discussing the possible origin of the 'word' "macacawitz" with more cr
rabidrobot
By, "the word", I was referring to "Macacawitz". Which I thought was the "word" under discussion, and which my provided links clearly relate to. But I hear ya.
I'm no conspiracy theorist, but one can't help but recognize patterns. It is after all, fairly natural to see order and reason in things, even when it is not there. But at times it seems that the ever dwindling Bush supporters are somehow all reading from the same page. I'm sure it is just a coincidence, for example, that on the same day a blogger on JoeUser.
So, let's get this straight. A staffer uses a made up word, which Republicans came up with and which had been used dozens of times before online, including by the certainly Non-Democrat John "Foley is Dems Fault" Podhoretz at <a href="http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=ODBiODMwNzYyMjA2ZmU3YTVjNT
I hate to rain on the parade, but this was not written by an 86 year old woman. From snopes.com The letter quoted above was one man's method of blowing off steam at having to deal with some of these exasperating aspects of modern banking. It was penned by Peter Wear, a columnist for the Courier Mail in Brisbane, Australia, for that publication's "Perspectives" column. The letter was not actually sent to a bank; it was a hum
Unfortunately, vbscript is not one of the languages Google Code Search searches for. Javascript, yes, vbscript, nay. (At least as far as I can tell. See the advanced mode: WWW Link
Well, that seems to have worked just fine. One more experiment, and I will stop bothering you. This is the same URL that I typed in another thread, and it displayed oddly. WWW Link EDIT: sorry to have wasted your time. I guess I can't replicate it either. Although I know it has happened to me more than once.
Regarding the deletion of all comment content during editing, on my end, I can replicate it in this manner. From the "Add A Reply:" section at a bottom of a thread, I click Advanced Mode. I then entered some text in the edit box. Then I clicked the View Source button four times in succession, and the test text disappeared. This is limited to Firefox, a similar test using Internet Explorer 6 did not lose the content of the edit box. Now, how often will that happen, someone repe
I'm sorry, all this debate is confusing. A Republican congressman sends disgusting IMs and emails to young pages. A page tells a reporter, who notifies the Republican sponsor of this page immediately (in "late 2005") Link The Republican congressman, Rodney Alexander, passes this information on to the Republican Speaker of the
"The URL of the page on which I am editing" Well. If I understand what is meant by this, I did provide it. Maybe it couldn't be seen in the middle of that block of text which had all the line feeds removed. https://forums.wincustomize.com/?forumid=168&aid=132305#1024098 Firefox information, latest official release: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.0.7) Gecko/20060909 Firefox/1.5.0.7 Listen. I didn't mean to co
Heh, yes, point taken, Bichur! The name is from a song, and it seemed an appropriate pun at the time--if you can imagine trying to edit a project via windows when the project itself is a window minimizer!
I am experiencing some strange behavior. I use Firefox. In the advanced edit mode there is a button, graphics are two angle brackets, tooltip View HTML Source. Clicking this button a few times will result in all the content being deleted. Using basic editing mode, as found at the bottom of all threads, and inserting links using the Insert Web Link button, the links will display mangled. As seen here As a no
Another option is WindowsKey-D, which leaves up widgets for me, but makes zoomer (but not my tabbed) docks disappear, and reappear. I created a widget, The Hardest Button To Button, to address this issue. You can get it here: WWW Link">Link I hope that isn't one of the widgets you tried already. CerebroJD also has a widget, Window Command: [link="https://www.wincustomize.com
What a great selection for Skinner of the Month! 47Songs is a fantstic skinner and a pillar of the skinning community. Congratulations!
Sorry to hear about the SKS trouble, but congratulations are definitely due for this 3 million milestone! Congratulations. 3 million...that is just huge!
I use Fireworks too. One of my favorite tutorials of all time is The Ultimate Aqua Button . Now, the Aqua look is not exactly the same as the glassy look now in vouge, but that tutorial was of great help to me in understanding what components work together to create an overall effect. Here is a basic orb tutorial: WWW Link and another <a href="http://www.ultraweav
drmiler, that link works for me. The fact that it is hosted on an archive site just means thefreerepublic.com has changed their website sometime in the past six years. The vitriol of the republican constituancy of the time clearly demonstrated. You choose to ignore the links I made to contemporaneous news sources quoting elected Republicans blatantly implying that they felt terrorism was not as important as Clinton thought it was. I feel
If he does not need to make up facts, then he shouldn't do it. I guess that last post was too filled with actual information for you to internalize it. I'll put it succinctly. Clinton did not "strenuously argue that he did 'everything in his power'", as Draginol claims. That is a statment of fact, by directly attributing a quote. It is a stament of an untrue, that is, made up, fact, as Clinton never used those words. He said ".
Here is a transcript of the interview in question. Yes, it is on a liberal, progressive site, but if people like they can probably find the same transcript on a site whose content they are more likely to trust: Link Draginol said: But Clinton strenuously a
A bit late for making suggestions, I know. But I think it would have been fairer to present the wallpapers to potential voters in a random order. Multiple columns of thumbs could also have reduced the need to view quite so many pages.
Setting activation to rectangular is actually probably a good idea. If your image has totally transparent areas, and is set to activate on visible area, as the image animates, the mouse will at time be over and not over the image. Which means it triggers the animation multiple times. Which gets stored in a queue ready to animate as soon as the previous animations finish. So you can end up, if you wave the mouse pointer quickly on and off such a zoomer, having the animation run agai
In response to drmiler: Well, I'm not going to defend politicians for being idiots. It should be pointed out, though, that the means for disarming or, rather, containing to no arms, Iraq, are the important issue. Sanctions, inspectors, and so on were working. Obviously, as we haven't found any weapons of mass destruction. Although, you wouldn't know that if you took President Bush at his word. In 2003 on Polish TV, he claimed
Moderateman: Bill had nothing to do with the arrest and trials of said terrorist asholes. So, by your logic, George had nothing to do with the capture of Saddam. That's an interesting viewpoint, for sure. Perhaps you can defend it a bit more.
I am not claiming non-U.S. citizens have, or even should have, all the rights granted to actual U.S. citizens by the U.S. Constitution. And it would take a real leap to read that into anything I have said thus far. But, one might do well to recall the words of our Founding Fathers, who said in the Declaration of Independance: <TD class="mb-Body-Quote-Te
Actually, I do want to address one more point specifically. Perhaps we just have differing definitions of "Nothing" Moderateman said: "The first twin tower attack 1993, Bill Clinton was President. Action taken? nothing." The facts are (copied from Snopes): "Four followers of the Egyptian cleric Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman were captured, convicted of the World Trade Center bombing in March 1994, and sentenced to 240 years in priso