[quote who="Milskidasith" reply="18" id="2236418"] Quoting woca, reply 17no one cares what you did. saying there is no chance of comeback makes quitting at the end the viable solution, not sitting there ps, there is a chance, but if you aren't going to try, sitting in game doesn't do much He never said he sat around. Read the thread. It's times like these that really made me wish excessive flaming wasn't going to get m
qft
[quote who="regabond" reply="1" id="2226397"]I think this should be implimented along with the conceding option. I just recently played a game where the entire other team left, but we stayed for the favor points.[/quote] this is the conceding option....
no one cares what you did. saying there is no chance of comeback makes quitting at the end the viable solution, not sitting there ps, there is a chance, but if you aren't going to try, sitting in game doesn't do much
[quote who="goldmull" reply="3" id="2234417"] Quoting ferm1nc, reply 2why is this forum filled with morons? wow..[/quote]
like i said, once you have 100,00 this could be a useless system. maybe just do 100 like stated, and it amtters early on we really need more info about how citizens play a role, and how creation of things works. is there going to be a default school building that will increase intelligence(random example)? or will i have to meet some standard? will my school be able to teach as much as the smartest person I have? if i add a research component how much will that increase what my
[quote who="pigeonpigeon" reply="1" id="2233812"] Quoting woca, reply 22are citizens gooing to skills or some sort of ranking for intelligence, strength etc? so if a bunch of strong guys were in one town, it'd be better at mining then a town with just intelligent ones? WAY too complicated, considering the vision is to have tens or probably hundreds of thousands of citizens.[/quote] not really. saying something is too complicated is never the sol
who are you dgl dalzk.. why you take dalzk name
are citizens gooing to skills or some sort of ranking for intelligence, strength etc? so if a bunch of strong guys were in one town, it'd be better at mining then a town with just intelligent ones? It would be cool to be able to kick out anyone in the city you wanted, so you couldexpand a giant civilization quickly accepting all, or deny access to those who aren't smart enough, creating a small but well advanced nation in retrospect
[quote who="Aeris130" reply="16" id="2230162"]I can't help but notice that you've lost 80% of your games as oak. Spirit much, or what?[/quote] hahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahah troll owned
[quote who="tperge" reply="5" id="2225361"]If you stupid enough to get in a 2v1 ( and yes it happens to me sometimes) then you deserve to lose.[/quote] losing is one thing, but getting a kill and dying isnt a huge loss, but it is in this case cause the assist gold
it's bs how you can get 1000 for killing a demigod alone, but if double teamed they get 1000 and 500 that needs to be changed. you coulds ay teamwork should be rewarded, but no, not when a 2v1 ends up 1vnone, the 2 should easily win. and if they do win, i still think it's messed up
[quote who="TheDarkshineKnight" reply="17" id="2218048"] You do know that the guy who was trolling around and got banned specifically stated that he wanted a refund, right? He wasn't playing the game anymore. As for the other bans, well, you'll have to provide evidence for them actually ocurring. Word of mouth can't exactly be trusted.[/quote]
ub best abilitiy is spit
[quote who="Chaosnaska" reply="1" id="2214651"]TL;DR. Im thinking aboot requesting a refund for this shit game. 3wks to fix NAT problems that shouldn't exist in a gold game is 3wks too long. Anyone else share my sentiment?[/quote] please do so. then you hopefully will stop trolling as for kestrels list, a lot of good points. as for the pantheon and skirmish, i hope to see some change in what matches we are put into. i dont
Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
speedtest.net go there, post results. maybe can't upload enough
hmm, hopefully you can fix the parts not in this patch asap
[quote who="Ouchy Dathurts" reply="21" id="2195927"]There's a good reason items in DotA aren't shareable anymore. Once a person leaves you can take their stuff with no problems but when they're in a game their items (outside of regen rings and silly stuff that's not an issue) don't work on other people. You also cant work together to build an item. You don't fully understand the implications of what this would allow for. Me and my friends used to rush a divine rapier (+200 damage, drops on th
its a defining passive, needs active defining move
is his talk of netlag true? and the numbers he uses?
he doesnt give him anything defining rook - towers beast- spit reg- snipe oak - pent/ressurect tb - shatter, two modes etc of course some will be slightly changed, but needs own thing
[quote quoting="post"]We can not sit here and not say anythen cause we did not us buyers would get more games at the same state as this game or previous ones.[/quote] I read the end hoping you'd sum it up. I was let down
nothing terribly original, just said lets take some moves and add stuns
[quote who="InfiniteVengeance" reply="5" id="2200415"]Nice avatar[/quote] hahaha
Demigod Forums