[quote who="TheDarkKnight2008" reply="696" id="2504100"] Yeah, and the scientists at the time were arrogant enough to think they know better then all of the establish religious doctrine. In fact, people like Christopher Columbus ignored the current doctrine that the world was flat. Try arguing when your belief in global warming has more to it then just a belief. [/quote] lol, yeah. AGW deniers are just like columbus. oh, and galileo. i spose creationist
-RAISTLIN-
competitive RTS - supcom forged alliance
[quote who="TheDarkKnight2008" reply="690" id="2504067"] People like you are the types who kept the victorian era going and burned scientists at the stake. [/quote] yeah, because im the one in here arrogant enough to think i know better than the world's leading experts on a particularly complex issue. the deniers are the ones akin to burning scientists you fool- im the one advocating that we listen to them.
[quote who="Mumblefratz" reply="683" id="2503630"]@-RAISTLIN- I think you've been posting directly from Word which tends to screw up the thread. The thread is OK for me as long as I use IE7 but if I use FF the thread breaks right after your reply #679 and there is no reply box if I'm on that page. The thread will fix itself once we get to another page or perhaps Kryo might come along and fix it for us but in the future try to avoid posting HTML directly from Word. <
[quote who="Daiwa" reply="677" id="2503406"] No AGW “sceptics” are climate scientists, and none of these sceptics have published work that presents a meaningful challenge to the consensus. You might want to reconsider that claim. Link. A couple of tidbits: According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado, Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007 – and
[quote who="Splitshadow" reply="675" id="2503361"]I think skepticism should be encouraged. Skepticism is the You can at least give the skeptics one thing; they actually learn about the science and question its validity. [/quote] lol! if deniers understood the science they wouldnt be deniers.
No, nothing of the sort. What I said, was that if you really are “questioning” the topic, then how about gaining an appropriate amount of knowledge with which to make your questioning valid? <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0
[quote who="Daiwa" reply="671" id="2503188"]We're all qualified to be sceptical, Raistlin, whether you like it or not. [/quote] Not really, only people with the requisite knowledge are qualified to be “sceptical” in this field. Those that do not possess such expertise are just armchair quarterbacks. True scepticism hinges upon evidence; ie
[quote who="psychoak" reply="661" id="2502383"] Retards don't seem to understand that extreme weather has been around longer than people have. The current conditions aren't anything new. Really now, at least attempt to make a point that isn't pointless. [/quote] The issue isn’t whether extreme weather conditions occur naturally. The question is
retards don't seem to understand that extreme weather conditions are a byproduct of climate change.
[quote who="tetleytea" reply="42" id="2499979"] LOL speaking of which, look at all the people who refuse to admit they're conspiracy theorists. I've got news for you: if you believe 19 Arabs simultaneously hijacked 3 commercial airlines with boxcutters and rammed themselves into buildings, YOU are a conspiracy theorist. Or maybe it was a lone suicide bomber that did it. [/quote] <span style="f
oh yeah, i just wanted to explain things to Seabrook the stupid ;)
[quote who="Daiwa" reply="20" id="2499302"] A tad touchy, there. [/quote] I explained that already. I hate idiot conspiracy theorists and those that spread their ideas. The internet is the most valuable knowledge-building tool mankind has ever seen, but these fuckwits use it to dumb everyone down. What’s not to touchy about?
[quote who="JagerJack" reply="18" id="2499291"] FYI thermite isn’t an explosive you retard, it is an incendiary quite incapable of controlled demolition. It’s the uninformed, youtube-trawlers of stupidity who don’t understand the first thing about the topics they spew nonsense about. Nano-thermite is used in explosives actually. Regular thermite is not. [/quote] <span
oh, i agree with much of what you've said. however there is no unilateral powerbroker that controls everything. Like i stated, such power is shared between many rich, powerful entitites, none of them necessarily in league with another. [quote who="BlackHawk141" reply="15" id="2499214"] For god sake people, amercians dont even own there central bank? does that not scare you?[/quote] Oh god. Please, l
[quote who="BlackHawk141" reply="13" id="2499178"]I can go on and on about who really owns the world, it aint the people, money controls the world, wall street controls the world. It doesnt matter if your a king, prime minister or a preseindent, if i had trillions of pounds, I can do anything I wanted to. Money = Control [/quote] <span style="font-
[quote who="synnworld" reply="8" id="2499109"] If it pisses you off than don't post or don't insult the op who you know nothing about. I highly doubt that especially if you try insulting someone over the internet on a gaming forum. [/quote] I’ll post about whatever I wish. <span sty
[quote who="synnworld" reply="4" id="2499082"] The fact you even try to attack what IK do to further my education without even knowing about me shows how much of an idiot you are. Last time I checked being in university is furthering ones own education, but you probably don't know what a college let alone a university is. [/quote] I graduated with hons before you eve
[quote who="synnworld" reply="2" id="2499063"] Wow, someone should take their own advice don't you think? I am already furthering my education; what about you? [/quote] Watching conspiracy theory videos on youtube doesn’t coun
[quote who="_Golgoth_" reply="60" id="2498719"]FA >>> Supcom Reading Reds post was interesting It should be noted that Supreme Commander did have major problems. The Aeon and Seraphim were too weak. The Aeon had IMBA planes (The Mercy and T3 AA Gunship) that made them powerful intially and worth using but the mercy was quickly nerfed and the slow speed, fire rate and crap health of the T1 Aeon tanks was quickly realised. The Seraphim tank was better than the Aeo
My opinion is you should grow the F up, get an education and then perhaps you wouldn’t be concerned with every piece of conspiracy theory tripe you find in the bowels of the internet.
[quote who="kyogre12" reply="180" id="2498016"] You're missing out on a lot. Although, from your comments, I'm going to guess you're one of those RTS's suck, TBS's are better kind of people Why can't the RTS people and the TBS people just get along without arguing about one or the other being "better" or "more strategic"?[/quote] Sins, despite being a pretty good achievement, is still pretty shallow compared to dedicated RTS or 4X games.
the 2 aliens games. supcom 2.
[quote quoting="post"] Number 10: If I say “Stay awhile…stay forever!” Our community will have the highest concentration of people who know where that comes from.[/quote] ;)