Alacer

Reply to Prioritize Targets w/o Focus Fire? in Strategy Stardock Forums

Well, this change will work only in single. But is better then nothing :)

Reply to Prioritize Targets w/o Focus Fire? in Strategy Stardock Forums

Hmm... as a matter of fact You can change this factors by Yourself. You don't need a developers to this. You must change some text files only.

Reply to Prioritize Targets w/o Focus Fire? in Strategy Sins Forums

Well, I play with my toy ;) a little and I see a very simple pattern. In case of Cobalts. If size of each group is below 7 then Defenders wins. If size of each group is 7 or greater then Attackers wins. It seems that in each particular fight there is a turn point where better is use Focus Fire then Spread Fire or more simply: If You have a huge army then don't waste time on Spread Fire because Focus Fire is better in this case anyway.

Reply to Prioritize Targets w/o Focus Fire? in Strategy Sins Forums

OK people. Mitigation problem is very interesting and is splitting fans on half thats why I create small application to check who has right. Nothing fancy :) Test application (call it little battle simulator) do a math for us. There are two groups of ships: Attackers, which use Focus Fire tactic. Defenders, which use Spread Fire tactic. You can setup a few parameters like amount of ships in each of group, hull, hull regeneration and dps. There is no shield but

Reply to Prioritize Targets w/o Focus Fire? in Strategy Stardock Forums

@soltyspl, how is possible to make the same amount of damage to 4 ships FG by 3 ships SG? Calculations are totaly wrong. Besides there is no hull and shield regen too. And... FG group will up mitigations to 60% too becouse this factor depends on amount of damage received not amount of ships. Make math again and You see that SG group is dead :)