The discussion about fleet supply has been raging since the beta of the game, back in 2007. You aren't going to win this argument, trust me.
Howdidudothat
@ Dark Cloud - Ok, I'll change it up then @ Top Vasari - Just give me some reviews to post and I will @Ravok - I said it before and I'll say it again, the content on this post is based on other players reviews. If you want to add someone, why don't you? The reason there aren't a lot of players listed is because people just complain and don't add value.
Aren't most _|~ players already on here, just named differently? Perhaps you could post a list of past and current names so that I can revise the list.
Just so you know, you can already do this. Simply scuttle the starbase and build a new one. You'll get 30% of the recources you put into it (50% for Vasari if you researched it). This game is designed such that some choices are final (i.e., fleet capacity). That way, you don't make these choices willy nilly. For instance, as some point, it's a better choice to research those tier 6 upgrades than to further tax yourself. This game is all about c
Not available yet, Read the OP.
RIP Carriers, we hardly knew you.
[quote] Starbase upgrades can now be queued from starbases that are under construction.[/quote] Thank you Blair. And to EadTaes, I agree. The carrier build penalty crushes the usefulness of carriers. Heck, they can't even defend now. At least cap ships should be able to build SC without a penalty. Anyway, just put 10 flak in your fleet and you never have to worry about SC again, which isn't the way things should be. Here'
Blair, We really need the carrier build penalty reduced. It is much too severe. I can go into the reasons, but other threads have all the content on it.
Jack is a smurf.
Gonzo, take a look at my HW. I think the answer would be obvious. I had already taken one of yellows roids. If that wasn't help, I don't know what is.
Aye. You better bring your butter churn too. Because once you're through with them, they'll be toast. Sorry, that was a really bad joke.
Raging Amish really should be Tier #1. At least, he was Tier #1, and I'm sure he is again after he shook out the cob webs.
LOL. That's the ICO staff, such as Blair himself.
agreed
That pretty much sums me up. Expander or defender. Eitherway, the guy is screwed.
Just so everyone is on the same page. This penalty, as far as I'm aware, is specific to Entrnchment. Vanilla sins does not have it.
fighters chew up bombers. Simple. Or a nice capital ship with magnitize/telepush/flak burst/jam weapons.
lol. The reason players are in DT is because they're the best. Bias? Astax is tier #1. If you think someone should be up there, let me know. This list is generated from community input, not mine.
Heretic. Police![e digicons]:banhammer:[/e] [e digicons]:waaaa:[/e]
A world where you don't get the dreaded yellow text of "Disconnected from Ironclad Online?" I don't know if I can take. Quick, someone, pour some cold gatorade on me.
Did I miss something? Am I being trolled? Yeah, ICO has issues, didn't know it was the result of someone hacking it.
Considering I know how to use the Z-axis, it doesn't give you any "surpise" ability. It just means you can get around fleets and structures without running into them.
You could build SBs. Those this eat illums for breakfast.
I contribute when necessary. itsmevic trolls for no reason. I've responded with logic before, but have just been pushed aside or been trash talked and I have given up with him. It's better just to ignore what he says and move the thread on to a new topic. Seriously.
Eads, you can still play, just know how to combat it. Sometimes, you got to beat fire with fire; or just go vasari and graba bunch of neutrals and out produce him. Assails out range repulse.