Jonnan001

Jonnan001

Joined Member # 3173210
0 Posts 359 Replies 9,290 Reputation

I confess I hadn't thought of it as a possibility, but it's been several games like this and the tech's not an option on my tech window - But Terakris has yet to *see* 13 billion people this game, (about 2 years in on this game) - the morale hits Before reinstalling I decided to try "One More Game" just to see if I *could* get a viable empire running despite the load stone economy and I did I research up to the 10% population boost technology for the advantage that g

127 Replies 264,510 Views

Democrats have a liberal wing and a conservative centrist DLC wing. Obama's voting record is that of the 34th or 35th most libreral in the senate, placing him about 1/3rd of the way between th center and the liberal wing - or squarely in the middle of the Democratic party. Of course he has a 96% voting record - as it happens he's in a party he agrees with most of the time. Screaming about it as if the Democratic party was solely created out of Dennis Kucinich clones, therefore anyone

40 Replies 133,377 Views

Well, I'm confused - Like I said, I just got off a 1.96 game of TA where I wiping the floor with the game (On my wussy 'normal' level of play) and on 1.99 I can't even get past 65% production. At this point - I have to think some file just didn't upgrade quite right and it's having a weird interaction that killing the economy or morale, because it *never* takes me three years to get my economy going - I'd be dead if I did. Sucks to be me - a reinstall it is then! Jonna

127 Replies 264,510 Views

Email them home and add them to your my games folder. I've noticed when playing concurrent games that savegame.a doesn't notice new ships created since it was started from savegame.b and so on (Which would be nice actually, if anyone at Stardock want to set the game syatem to refresh designs from that directory when you load a game.), but they are all saved in the relevant directory under your "My Games" Folder. At work, so I can't give you detailed info, but it's easy enough

2 Replies 7,035 Views

Right. This year National Journal says Obama is the 'most Liberal'. In 2004, by odd coincidence, it was John Kerry. I wonder what the odds are that in 2000 it was Joe Lieberman. Lets be clear - I don't believe them. I'm sure you do, because you people always take your positions from the polituro like good republicans should. But hey - lets list some of those "[link="http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/votes.htm"]liberal[/link]" votes that National Journal made their deci

40 Replies 133,377 Views

[quote who="Marvin Kosh" reply="3" id="1896240"]The economy is a bit different than in DA. Lots of the buildings cost more maintenance, so you need to place less money-sucking buildings (or demolish some of the ones you already have). Use the asteroids where possible to avoid building so many factories. Ensure theat your colonies have the best population, by building transports (a coloniser with an extra colony module, or a proper troop transport) to move excess population w

127 Replies 264,510 Views

You seem to be in a ranting mood, and I'm not going point for point at this time of the morning. That said -some general observations . . . First of all , Palin's association with weird fundies was documented before Countdown covered it. Sadly, as much as you may dislike Olbermann, his facts are pretty much straight. I'm guessing you're more of a Fox News afficianado? People on the right bitch and gripe about Keith Olbermann, but on those occasions when it turns out he g

40 Replies 133,377 Views

Governor definitely needs to be saved between games - probably should be keyed to the tech tree so you can use it for Atarian, etcetera. Would *like* it to simply be selectable from the colony menu, the same way you can tackle the starport queues. That said - I *swear* something is off about the economy - I absolutely can *not* stay afloat economically. No matter how I tweak taxes and production I'm barely able to keep approval high enough to expand my population. I've slowed

127 Replies 264,510 Views

Just out of curiosity - does the number of 'moves' a mining vessel has have any effect in how fast it upgrades bases - I tend to up grade my engines over time just so they can move between bases faster, but it seems like they upgrade the existing bases a bit faster too and I haven't been sure if that's a real phenomenon or a perception resulting from my being more distracted by other things in the middle-late game. Jonnan

15 Replies 7,288 Views

[quote who="Extant Faora" reply="3" id="1894891"]I hate getting sent to opposite sides of the galaxy early game, it's a bummer and a waste of Survey Ship. I personally decommission all my Survey ships, I wonder if anyone actually upgrades them, which is their intended purpouse in a way. To be upgraded into a slightly more powerful ship. Key word here is "slightly". If anyone does actually upgrade those pieces of crap, please amuse me. Eitherway I consider it i

32 Replies 14,455 Views

[quote who="MysticRhythms" reply="19" id="1895706"] Quoting Asret, reply 17 Just out of curiosity, has Microsoft ever successfully enforced their EULA against a home user? This guy?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp_v._Zamos The problem is like I mention above. The system is stacked against the private citizen when facing down large corps with lawfirms on retainer and staff lawyers. Though this guy did pretty well.[/quote] As that case w

325 Replies 1,060,465 Views

Agreed, and moreso - I'd like the tech tree to have accessible for modding; Mutually exclusively techs, like good /neutral/evil, but customizable Hidden techs; multiple tech prerequisites (Two is by it's nature sufficient - if you need more than two, you can design it in multiple stages - nonetheless the ability to do more than that would be better. And non- tech prerequisites; similar to the disease tech, something that allowed a tech to only be accessible in

95 Replies 331,541 Views

[quote who="Frogboy" reply="5" id="1895204"][quote] VMorally, ethically, and IMHO legally, this is a sham. Like I have noted in prior posts, (1) a publisher should not be able to recharacterize what is essentially a sale into a "license" merely by putting a piece of paper in the box or setup program, and (2) a publisher who benefits from the protection conferred by copyright law should not be able to remove the parts of copyright law that it doesn't like (or "avoid getting exploite

325 Replies 1,060,465 Views

Two (Possible) Bugs: 1: I'm not getting something about the new planetary governor, and I'm not finding it in the manual. How exactly do you add a new governor list? I can access the governor, but all I have is 'none' and the two checkboxes, various fiddling around has failed to activate any way to save a queue or add a governor. 2: Has the economic formula been tweaked harder? I've switched the Psilons from the Terran to the Altarian tech tree (I always tend to

127 Replies 264,510 Views

Thanks for the link - I'm going to have to print it off and read it through, but I see several assumptions that feel off to me, so I need to verify or debunk my own intuitions before responding - it may be a next week thing. But, just looking at the authors, the problem with reports like these is they're written by people that already agree with each other, particularly in congress and especially in the House - Jim Saxton seems to be a pretty moderate Republican, Gwartney is a member

164 Replies 499,151 Views

Ookay - cutting out the paqrts that have no relationship to anything I noted anyone actually posting . . . [quote who="psychoak" reply="16" id="1894889"] Her fiscally irresponsible mayoral activities were referendums voted on by the people. Yes, some fucktard that didn't vote for them is pissing and moaning about it. The massive spending increases barely kept pace with population growth. It's a rapidly expanding small city, they're improving their infrastr

40 Replies 133,377 Views

Wow - an 'example'? Educational funding going to religious schooling. Exemptions from the law for churches using federal funds. Attempts to use churches as political tools without losing their tax exempt status. Attempting to put religious symbols in courthouses and on public grounds specifically as displays of our 'christian heritage' (As distinguished from displays that honor a variety of cultures) Attempts to override Roe v Wade and restrict a womans

40 Replies 133,377 Views

[quote who="Josef086" reply="9" id="1894734"] [quote]sir, yes, we know Pneumonia is often fatal without treatment, but as an avowed fundamentalist that has argued the being gay is a sin, you are restricted from getting any medicine developed using the theory of evolution among it's premises. I'm sorry sir, no you *can't* use our web connection to find another hospital - the GPS imagery it uses has been found to contradict the biblical view of a flat earth. I would be delighted to drive y

40 Replies 133,377 Views

[quote]To answer Jonnan I got my information from a C.P.A. also I did not mean that they would not invest and you are right there is little drop in investing when C.G. is raised. But there is good drop in the amount of investments being sold[/quote] You are distinguishing, somehow, between investing, which I consider to be people buying investments, and "Amount of investments being sold", or people selling investments. Typically, people buying is, by definition, equal to peop

164 Replies 499,151 Views

A. no, not really. You can now use active agents tactically, rather than strategically. Basically, the passive agents are the CIA HQ analysts, that do the number crunching "We know they have this many people, and we know what the tax structure looks like, so we can work out that they're spending this much on their military, this much in social projects, and we have this much unaccounted for so it must be in classified research projects . . " Since this means you can *get* to advanced

127 Replies 264,510 Views

Don't feel left out - lot's of us *in* America don't understand. There is a large segment of the population in the U.S. (And elsewhere, but we seems to be losing to them worse here) that just don't accept science, as a concept. Emotionally, I suppose I can understand it - Science hones in on a consistently better and better understanding of the universe, but by definition there is always room for a theory to be disproved or a grand paradigm shift to show what we thought we kne

40 Replies 133,377 Views

[quote who="Bodyless" reply="11" id="1894097"]Well that sentences were more of an summary. The flaw is that you want the user to have all the rights he/she may have. But any right one person has limits on the same time the rights of another person. And since Blizzards consists of person you limit the rights of them. But there is no reason why one side should enjoy all possible rights and the other be completely limited to what the law may garantue them as a minimu

462 Replies 1,156,441 Views