Sins Forums
Not again, I thought it was over, guess I was wrong![e digicons]
Sins Forums
[quote who="JuleTron" reply="18" id="2121053"] Actually I find bombers are the perfect counter for the orky. And yes I tried this against a human Vasari as Vasari. Are they more expensive than the anti-structures? Yes because they do more than attack structures therefore they cost more. Yes, as myself and others have said, Vasari bombers should fill the anti-Orkulas role. Anyway, I've noticed a SB bug. When you se
Sins Forums
OMFG, who is this guy?? I mean seriously, get a life or something, Stardock is not gonna start policing this forum OK(except maybe to get people like you banned, that would be ironic[e digicons]o_O[/e] ). Now go away, we dont want people like you around here, go back to the hole you live in.
Sins Forums
[quote who="Annatar11" reply="2" id="2120183"] Quoting astrath, reply 25 Imagine what would happen if Anny went psycho. It would take several years for us to get him banned Is that an invitation to gouge your eyes out with rusty hooks? Besides, I bribe Zubaz and kryo [/quote] WAit a minute, Eye gouging Rusty hooks Bribes Your just asking for it, prepare to be
[quote who="Moosetek13" reply="1" id="2119813"]Simply start at the beginning. [/quote] ??? [quote who="psychoak" reply="2" id="2119823"]Wow... You bought a lot of Stargate. I'd put Atlantis after the first five seasons of SG-1, those are just plain badass, but before the decline. It's way better than the post-gould ori arc. About the time the cast started ditching SG-1, it was past time to kill the slow. I'm rather glad
Sins Forums
[quote who="astrath" reply="25" id="2120179"]Imagine what would happen if Anny went psycho. It would take several years for us to get him banned [/quote] lol, yeah, just in time for Sins 2
Sins Forums
The day people get banned from a gaming forum will be a sad, sad day indeed![e digicons]:'([/e]
<td style="padding-right: 5.4pt; padding-left: 5.4pt; padding-bottom: 0cm; width: 4cm; padding-top: 0cm; backgro
[quote who="IztokBitenc" reply="6" id="2119894"]Hi! DamagePercentBonus:ANTIVERYLIGHT:CapitalShip 0.5 DamagePercentBonus:ANTIVERYLIGHT:VeryLight 1.5 DamagePercentBonus:ANTIVERYLIGHT:Light 0.75 DamagePercentBonus:ANTIVERYLIGHT:Medium 0.5 DamagePercentBonus:ANTIVERYLIGHT:Heavy 0.5 DamagePercentBonus:ANTIVERYLIGHT:VeryHeavy 0.5 Please, in what file did you find these data? I'm looking for it for two days now but can't find it.
I dont know if this is the right place to post this, but I have a few questions. First, i'd like to say that I was not a fan of Stargate SG-1, but lately a friend convince me to watch o few episodes, so I did. It wasn't so bad, so I bought the first 3 seasons, and after that all the season up to the 7th. Now that I have finish watching the first 7 seasons, I ordered the last 3, I should have them by the end of the week. 1. Should I buy Stargate Atlantis?, i
[quote who="Astax" reply="8" id="2118798"]Why are you posting? Go play my campaign! [/quote] I would, but your campaign doesn't have a story with cinematics. [quote who="Annatar11" reply="9" id="2118803"] lets hope IC does to. It's already been answered twice in this thread. They're not going to do a campaign just for the sake of having a campaign like every other RTS. Once you play the "extended tutorial campaign" once, you never care to
[quote who="Astax" reply="4" id="2118603"]Here let me make a campaign for you. Small Random map. You vs easy AI. You are TEC, the AI is Vasari. Assumes you have Entrenchment and Quick Start enabled. Chapter 1. Use your scouts to scout the surrounding planets. Locate the nearest Asteroid. Build 4 Cobalt frigates and a Colony Frigate. Go to the Asteroid, defeat the locol militia and set up a new colony. Build up
[quote who="ze_doom" reply="20" id="2118575"]in tearms(sp??) of "flagship" none of you have taken into account the fact that every fleet had a flagship simply put... its just the ship used to command a fleet in the colonial(sp??) age it was usualy just a normal ship of the line. [/quote] Maybe, but the flagship represent la crème de la crème, the best of the best. Its the equivalent of having a good leader; troops are gonna be inspired by a good leader, th
[quote who="JuleTron" reply="7" id="2117569"] he main one would be to stick them in choke points so that if people try to run their fleet past your chokepoint, some ships might get seperated and stuck My point was that, it would be much better to destroy the enemy ships rather then slow them down. they only work if you also consider that Vasari mine layers are mobile and can accompany your fleet. the idea is to set traps with them.<br /
[quote who="crashmatusow" reply="5" id="2117558"] Quoting Dargoon999, reply 4 ...Right now I dont see the point of those mines, worse yet, you have to research them if you want to use them, maybe if they did not require research (available when Ruiser is researched), they might be more useful. this is the single dumbest argument i ever hear about abillites. if you've got the money to throw around deploying mass mines, you pro
[quote quoting="post"]I have never used these things, has anyone else? Why would you want to slow down the enemy fleet when you can just blow it up? So, does anyone think they are useful? If so, what is the bst way to use them? btw, this is probobly a dumb questio, but does anyone know what the Entrenchment logo is supposed to be? [/quote] In a previous thread (can't remember which one), a guy made a good suggestio
[quote who="Bobucles" reply="1" id="2117115"]Oh wait. This isn't a real patch post. Buffing the siege frigate while keeping it at tech level 1 very easily leads to problems. [/quote] No its not a real patch, those are my personnal suggestion to improve the core gameplay of Sins. Siege Frigates are in need of some love. The buffs I recommand are necessary for making them a viable option. If I'm gonna invest ressources in Siege Frigates, I want them to actually d
Assault Cruisers (TEC/Advent) <span
I agree it would be nice to have one Flagship with additional bonuses, but not to the level you are mentioning; level 10 or 100% to shields/hull/... thats just too much! Maybe it could go something like this: TEC: +20% fire rate for all friendly ships in the gravity well. Advent: +10% shield restoration & +10% antimatter restoration for all friendly ships in the gravity well. Vasari: +20% hull repair for all friendly ships in the gr
Sins Forums
[quote who="N3rull" reply="15" id="2116074"]PS. The reason I wrote this wall of text above is to show you how limitlessly sophisticated it is, for a Vasari set up against an entrenched Vasari, to mount an effective offensive. By effective I mean an attack, during which the attacker has at least one advantage above the defender. In Any other matchup the attacker has an advantage. - in Tec/Adv VS. any faction , the attacker has the advantage of torpedo cruiser
[quote who="Foraven" reply="8" id="2112343"]Anyone here think starbase comes way too early in the tech tree? Theses monsters require a lot of resources to build and maintain, i think they should come after we have the economy upgrades to support them. The AI bankrupt itself building starbases while it could build more raffineries and trade stations... [/quote] Yes, yes, yes, I thought I was alone on this one. I personnaly would like to see starbases higher up the tech tree. Level
[quote who="SorcererFailure" reply="6" id="2115522"]i played a 1v1v1 game with an idlebot once, i kept stacking defence forces after i finally got the ball rolling on the guy i was fighting, wondering more and more wtf the green player was doing the more time passed. after over an hour he said in chat that he had just come back from walking his dog he spent all his stockpiled stuff to trench down something fierce too<b
I dont hate starbases, but I dont like them. They are responsible for increasing the length of games (and I thought games were already long). But on the other hand, all the other upgrades in Entrenchment are a welcome addition (Mines, Synergy, Shield Bestowal, Meson Bolt, Burst Rockets, etc...). I know IC wanted to create something fun and exciting for entrenchment (IC concentrated a lot of energy into starbases), but it just doesn't work for me. <p
I agree, once the construction of a ship begins in a shipyard, it should come out of that specific shipyard.
Instead of bidding on someone else, you should be able to bid on yourself. The winner of the bid could choose where to send the Pirates. This would give a better level of control; choosing the enemy of your choice and which planet to attack.