[quote who="sanhosee" reply="3" id="2172829"]First of all... Flag capture is a bit of a double-edged sword really. If you spend your time running from flag to flag you'll easily fall behind in experience points, especially in the early levels when killing enemy creeps is a valid method of leveling. Then again, the bonuses -and war score- are often something you absolutely need. What I'm trying to say is that keeping all the flags captured isn't the main purpose or
aias
Some of you will already know this stuff, if that is you, do not bother being offended by these simple suggestions. But if you are new, and you're getting started now, read this. Capture and Retain control of the neutral flags: This is one the most important things and first thing (after buying some basic equipment) you should do in a game. capturing flags gives you experience, as well it increas
Does your computer have a model number?
I did that, and some other things, something amongst all of it worked.
I'm trying to find the source of my connection problems and have come across the fact that I'm connecting through a symmetrical NAT router. I'm wondering if they is the problem. UPnP is enabled, and 6073 is forwarded to my machine. However, there still seems to be a problem. Router is a linksys wrt110.
I try to be balanced about it.
bump
[quote who="Disinherited" reply="3" id="2162671"]Thanks for the responses. I realize the hinderances of IGP; the Radeon 3200 is one of the best IGP's and it's still not ideal for gaming. Just wondering because it does exceed the requirements/recommendations and it tested decently for far more system intensive games. I found an old thread that said the Radeon 3200 runs the game rather smoothly but I wanted to see if that was true/still the case. [/quote]according to the
[quote who="ChevChelios" reply="12" id="2165096"]ubersmurf, are you talking about the game where you played myself, zoobi, and lavidimus? [/quote]Maybe, what game was that? The crucible game I mention?
[quote who="Jaradakar" reply="6" id="2165029"]To the OP, Suck it up butter cup. Games against good players last maybe ~20 mins sometimes less. I think you can spare a few mins to finish the game. IMO people need to stop being such POOR SPORTS and learn how to LOSE with grace/style. "Never give up, never surrender!" --------------------------------------------------- I was in a 3v3 last night (2v2 life opponnets and 1v1 AI).&nb
[quote who="Aroddo" reply="24" id="2164754"]or you get favor points for an honorable loss. or you lose favor points for leaving. or both.[/quote]I like one but not two, like I said there are too many connection problems to penalize for leaving a game.
[quote who="TravCarp" reply="17" id="2164669"]I'm against it. This will ruin most of the game as full games will never be played again.[/quote]Does the final animation really matter that much? If you've won you've won, I don't see how it makes a difference.
[quote who="Moonlapse" reply="19" id="2164678"]Here's my take on it: Similar to DotA, I think you should play to the end. Leavers suck, end of story. However, people are going to leave anyways, regardless of what you do about it. So, I think as far as matchmaking goes (and favor points) you should be penalized more for leaving than for a loss. However, if all of your opponents leave I do think you should just be given your victory. Playing against an A
[quote who="Funky-F15" reply="5" id="2164142"] Quoting AngryZealot, reply 3I play to win. I prefer opponents who also play to win. If I'm going to lose, why should I waste both my time and my opponents' by fighting a lost cause? So no, I would not be upset if my opponents quit when a win was certain. They are doing me a favor by saving me time. There is no shame in admitting defeat. I for one would love to send you to war or atleast some form of battle with that at
[quote who="nosferat1" reply="11" id="2164420"]Should i repeat this every post?..make somehow a banlist.I mean that solves so many issues,leavers,foul language,bad ping.Firstly you ban the people that have bad ping and are known to be leavers.That you do for yourself,your games. On the global banlist,you ban those people that left in the middle of a balanced game or some hardcore people,that like swearing every 30 or so seconds.You have your replay to proove it,and the guy gets a g
I vote you please wait for more statistical data to be accumulated to voice your concerns, and point out anything you think is the cause.
ces't bump
[quote who="Silencer8306" reply="15" id="2164646"] Quoting theubersmurf, reply 14 Quoting Silencer8306, reply 11 Bloody coward ! Fight till death ! Uh...it's not real, it's a game. And that's humor (btw i love your avatar )[/quote]I'm glad to hear that, and thanks! :P
[quote who="Sowaka" reply="3" id="2164311"]Agree with just about all of those, though I don't think I'm nearly as frustrated as you.[/quote]Pretty much this comment.
[quote who="Silencer8306" reply="11" id="2164626"]Bloody coward ! Fight till death ! [/quote]Uh...it's not real, it's a game.
[quote who="Eternal_Silence" reply="9" id="2164607"]If one of my partners gives a GG and "concedes" let him...but instead of letting him be controlled by AI, let me control his character as well as my own. Or if my other partner is better than me, let him control the other character as well as his own. In my opinion this is how it should work. It's fun winning 2v3's and 1v3's in other tactical online games. The real problem here is that AI in DG is pretty bad
[quote who="mrlarone" reply="8" id="2164591"]one idea would be to look at the favour point system. not sure if it's possible but i'd think the 'gods' would be more impressed with someone who fought to the last. so, say there's a modification of favour point allocation once the teams come unbalanced. e.g. you starting get 1-10fp's for (demigod) kill you get. basically a system that allows for you to lose the match (as seems inevitable) but still worthwile in te
[quote who="ddd888" reply="7" id="2164577"]for the mechanic of this game its possible to have great comeback some demigod scales way better than other and so at lvl 20 could outperform even with less equip i won a game 2 v2 where we started really badly, we were like lvl 16-15 and they were both lvl 20, the map was 90% for them too, with more mines and bonuses but couldnt push the last part of the map, as soon as we got flooded by troops and we lvled to
[quote who="mrlarone" reply="3" id="2164539"]IMHO the best thing is to realise that we play on line to play with each other because it's fun. that said, as long as someone's still having fun then, even if i've lost horribly, then i have a kinda duty to let them have their fun. why do i do this? because i want to game with a comunity that likes to have fun and encourges each other to that end. now, more specifically, if I say GG and the other team wa
[quote who="bug" reply="2" id="2164533"]Even if you concede defeat, the opposing team still has to fight the AI to win. Something that should be considered as well.[/quote]That's part of the point, is a mechanism, in the game, allowing a team to concede, that gives the other team a win.