Are you talking about measuring wind speed here?
mickeko
Great... Now developers can skip W7 compatibility, and stick to making 32-bit XP apps... Woohoo, let's create more ways to stop this crazy fad called "new technology".
[quote who="starkers" reply="25" id="2166355"]I believe the chicken was rash in its decision to cross the road and not use the nearby pedestrian crossing[/quote] Not that it really change the issue... The question remains, no matter where it crossed. :D
[quote who="Neilo" reply="10" id="2166131"]There would be one tab, nest to the view drop down box, and checkboxex next to your replied threads. Check which boxes you wish to unsub from and click the tab. There is empty space there so how it is clutter i'm not sure. "Ignore this thread"...LOL...i really would need an "unsubsribe" feature then, imagine the turn it would take. No thoughts SD...Bara? You reading?[/quote] So when you find a thread you want to remove f
[quote who="TravCarp" reply="3" id="2165216"]Kaspersky is the clear winner.[/quote] It is not. There is no "clear winner" in this area, which should be very apparent by now.
[quote who="Neilo" reply="7" id="2164530"]@^ Exactly. A tab in the My Replies page that hides checked replies is all that is needed. Another tab to unhide. [/quote] Ew, I hope not. Tabs are good for separating things, but to use tabs to filter forum threads feels like unnecessary clutter.
But but but... It's been RETROFITTED!! :D
[quote who="RedneckDude" reply="2" id="2164174"]Sounds good here too. Intriguing idea. (redneckdude hopes he spelled it right)[/quote] Itrigueieubum! :D Anyways, there is no "subscribe to thread", so obviously there can't be any "unsubscribe" either. To retain the functionality of "my replies" and still make it possible to sort of unsubscribe, I propose the following: Add a "Hide" button to every thr
[quote who="Randall30" reply="9" id="2164417"]I doubt there will be a new version for years to come.[/quote] Where's the real proof for that statement then?
Stop letting every darn goat escape. flees
surprises
[quote who="k10w3" reply="15" id="2162443"]Thanks for setting me straight, 2of3.[/quote] Darn.. I liked you a bit bent... :P
[quote who="b0rsuk" reply="19" id="2162409"] Quoting mickeko, reply 15 We use windows, we need AV software. Claiming an OS is antivirus software is silly, as is claiming vista to be more secure than any linux distro. (emphasis mine) No, it's not silly, it's called being educated. A good OS doesn't need an antivirus. Linux doesn't have viruses thanks to a couple of factors. [/quote] Most viruses spread because of careless users. Once those car
Vipre sounds good, but where are the tests on how it performs what it's meant to do?
[quote who="Cynthdivide" reply="12" id="2162130"]I think I'd trust my word more that Vista is quite a bit more secure than any linux distro you can install. That's a fact.[/quote] Actually it's not, but I'm not here to prove you wrong. It's as out of place in this thread as Malius comment is. We use windows, we need AV software. Claiming an OS is antivirus software is silly, as is claiming vista to be more secure than any linux distro. Now focus
[quote who="Malius" reply="10" id="2162002"]Here is how you get the best Anti Virus software. 1) Go to: http://www.ubuntu.com/ 2) Reformat your HDD and install Ubuntu 8.10 (or you other favorite Linux distros). I'm a software engineer, computer security expert, and malware removal expert, and my PC is AV and Windows free.[/quote] You also make stupid comments implying incompetence and naivety to me. Here's a stupid incompetent reply I've
[quote who="2of3" reply="7" id="2161739"] In the vista style there is an error with the more programs arrow: That is a common problem, Sc4fry due to your Itallian OS[/quote] Should be avoidable by adjusting margins smartly though? If it can't be done without ruining centering of items in english, perhaps it's good to add an "international" variation, where things are fitted appropriately. (As a service for those of us who run non-english). :)
[quote who="Salotus" reply="8" id="2161974"] No, I basically just assumed. Truthfully, the fact that I have dll problems and Norton may not be related at all, this is the internet after all I don't have to be a reliable source of intel. Also some evidence that backs up your claim, I replaced the apparently corrupted dll with one I found of the internet which was suppose to solve the problem, but nothing changed. [/quote] +1 Karma for unprecedented humility and honesty. :D</p
[quote who="Hadberz" reply="6" id="2161963"] My only con is uninstalling it is insane, best to just format. I only do this when I can get an updated copy from work. [/quote] You can always download the norton uninstaller. It has never failed me yet. Currently, there's no good reason for uninstalling it though. :D
Banned because.... because.... because.... dangit!! ... YOU'RE BANNED, ALLRIGHT?!??!
[quote who="Salotus" reply="3" id="2161946"] Quoting WarlokLord, reply 24 McAfee VirusScan My group swears by it, including a professional network admin. . Avoid Norton: it corrupts your network dlls which can and reliably causes rafts of problems gaming (from first-hand experience). I originally had McAfee and love it, especially since it’s easy to switch off when needed. Currently I do have Norton, an
[quote who="NelsMonsterX" reply="1" id="2161909"]DO NOT pay for bloated anti-virus software! AVG free works great, and if that doesn't catch everything you can run a free scan from Trend Micro's website. Besides that, run Ad-Aware or C Cleaner often, defrag your HD often, and your PC will run like a top. Oh, and try not to look at too much pr0n! Sex causes viruses in cyberspace too.[/quote] [e digicons]:rolleyes:[/e] Tell me, how would you de
I feel cheated though... Removing something is rather different from something getting changed. :P
Could have been at av-comparatives . If you read their first main test of the year, you'll notice that Symantec beats pretty much every other suite. It detects more malware than Kaspersky (incidentally, ESET Nod32 falls behind on pretty much everything too), it does it faster, and with less false positives. Personally, I call Symantec the overall winner in that test because it's the only suite combining great detection and low amoun