[quote]with non-traditional, anti-American ideals and interests[/quote] Pray tell, what are those ideals and interests?
AldericJourdain
You're talking about this one right: docs.house.gov/edlabor/AAHCA-BillText-071409.pdf
[quote]Isn't that what every individual is supposed to do? Isn't religion supposed to be personal and subjective? Aren't you supposed to keep it to yourself?[/quote] Good point; with ANYTHING you read (watch, etc.), you go with your interpretation.
[quote]'death panel' provisions of the bil[/quote] You're making a large accusation, so lets see your evidence. Come on, cough it up.
[quote]The funny thing is that the left doesn't realize America isn't buying their nonsense this time.[/quote] Oddly enough, Americans are not buying the Republican's nonsense either. This could be a prime opportunity for a third party, like say the Libertarian Party.
Hmm, either you're being sneaky and have made the pictures blend into the surrounding...or no pictures. ^_^ [quote]we should not fight among ourselves.[/quote] Well said, and I agree! I hope you know that I've never taking our discussions personally; I realize that we agree and disagree and so on, so forth. Later, ~A
[quote]Some would call that insider trading. I'm not sure how you would expect us to take the word of a person who is willing to break company policy in this manner. Also, unless the guy is some kind executive in a really high position in UPS with access to financial information that can indicate what you mentioned, I wouldn't take their word either, because I too worked for UPS before.[/quote] With suspicion I'm sure, but hey, I provided a basis for my words, instead of just making w
[quote]I find it rather pathetic and somewhat shameful that some people in this country thought it was OK (morally) to create Bushism merchandise and profit from it while ridiculing the leader of their nation in the process. It is said that the position of the POTUS is a position to be respected, the position of a man/woman who represents us in the world stage, who people from other countries judge based on the opinions of those he leads. For 8 years the Democrats made it not only their job b
[quote]Tell that to Obama, he was the one that brought it up. BTW, thanks for giving more proof of the facts. After so many years of service, the post office has yet to be efficient or even profitable, you gotta question why a Gov't with so much power, so much money has yet to correct this?[/quote] Just because you have the capibility or where-with-all, means you act rationally or logically.
[quote]That was a stupid claim, and sometimes you have to wonder if Obama even believes the nonsense he speaks.[/quote] Stupid or not, the basis from which it was made...brings up questions. That being said, I wonder the same thing about other...people. ~A
[quote]Speaking of childish & immature...[/quote] Your point?
[quote]this statement goes well with the one about the 57 states. Of couse the media will push this under the rug like they do everything else they wish to ignore for the good of their agenda. [/quote] I find it...rather pathetic that people are still bringing up the 57 states comment up. To me, no matter who said it, it comes across as childish and immature. I mean really, who cares if he slipped up and said 57 states? It's not like he slipped up and said he wanted to go to war with
[quote]well we know it's not the Post Office...Obama even said so! [/quote] Just a thought: When has the post office, ever, been efficient? I mean you go back to the mail coaches and further back to royal mail - it's never been efficient. So...really...is it a good basis to make such a claim on?
[quote]Put them on the same playing field? UPS chooses to unionize & now 'someone' wants to force FedEx to accept unions. Level playing field, my ass.[/quote] FedEx is under different laws/rules as UPS is. There are FedEx employees who want to unionize, but are unable to because FedEx won't allow them to under the threat of loss of job. There's a lot of other crap that FedEx pulls. (This is coming from people who work for FedEx, so I'm not just pulling it out of my ass)<
[quote]Then do me a favor, look up the H-bomb tests of the 50's and 60's. The biggest bombs and destruction man can toss around. Where it was used live came back within a few growing seasons, the fish are still around the Bikini islands, those test areas are still too dangerous for man but everything else is back to normal. We destroyed nothing of import other than one more place man can not live. Chernobyl is back to normal as far as plant and animal life other than it is unsafe for humans.
[quote]Not at all. That's been my consistent position all along - individual choices to be 'green' are praiseworthy and even reasonable laws and regulations to improve air & water quality and to avoid needless environmental harm (at reasonable cost) are OK by me.[/quote] I was actually teasing you about complimenting me, when you've - lately - been less than complimentary toward me. Anyways, cool. [quote]Same here. My new house has geothermal heating, solar panels,
[quote]"It's the Dept. of Homeland Sec.'s job to spy on America citizens who legally gather and peacefully protest---as is their Constitutional right, I might add---against government policies and ideals with which they disagree?"[/quote] There's a difference between spying on your average citizen and someone that is supspect of terrorist ties/plot, etc. You know that RW. It's often said that in order to protect, you have to be sus
[quote]unnamed sources, sounds like something Obama would use. Hey Daiwa, looks like the Biden effect is kicking in.[/quote] The only reason that I stated "unnamed source," is because the person works at one of the UPS places and they have a policy about their workers talking about anything regarding the company. Sort of like a gag order. [quote]If you agree with Daiwa, then Obama himself admits that Gov't run programs do not work as well as private ones. If you disagree then
[quote]"UPS and FedEx are doing just fine. ... It's the Post Office that's always having problems."[/quote] Now that's funny. Oddly enough, from what I've heard from unnamed sources, UPS is doing fairly well though they've had to adjust their belt so to speak. It's FedEx that is losing it; I heard from that same source that FedEx is trying to stop legislation that would put them on the same playing field as UPS because they've had to change pants. Be well, ~
[quote]Depends on whether you are using turbotax or not like Tim Geithner was.[/quote] N'ah Charles. You see, they need to use Quicken.
[quote]For that you are to be commended.[/quote] Bet that took biting a bullet. ;) Thanks for the kudos. [quote]AJ, I and no one I know is arguing against doing what is right and good for your local area. I remember when lake Michigan was so polluted that people joked and atheist can walk across it. Back in the 60’s and 70’s people did not understand the impact of pollution. Once it was understood people and local governments acted and began to clean
[quote]The Dept. of Homeland Sec. is following Tea Party organizers on Twitter, Facebook, etc., and monitoring their websites; the Obama cadre has a website where people can report on friends and family who strongly disapprove or express distrust of, Obama's Health care policies.[/quote] First off, it's the Dept. of Homeland Security's job to moniter/deal ANY suspicious activities. If they're not keeping tabs on people they reasonably think could commit terrorist acts -
" Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state, an intolerable one. " ~Paine
You know, none of this really will change my belief on the enviroment; I'm still going to do everything I can to take care of it and lessen my impact. It's just what I feel is right. ~A
[quote]He'll (she'll?) soon replace OBL on the Most Wanted List (if he hasn't already).[/quote] Why do you say that? Sorry, but I just don't buy this line of thought.