[quote]That hardly surprises me.[/quote] Care to explain instead of resort to 6th grade?
AldericJourdain
[quote]When you or anyone else can prove to me that a large number of people get mad everytime someone is arrested then i can take such a comment seriously but again i go back to the same question. Without knowing why it happened, without knowing any facts what so eve, without knowing who the Black person or the White person is; why would anyone be mad about a police officer doing his job? Should we not wait till we know if it was wrong before was say it was wrong?[/quote]
[quote]I'm curious. Why do you see racism here? Because the man arrested was Black? Is arresting a Black man always a sign of racism? I'm even more curious as to why no body cared to find out the truth but instead just to conclusions and damage a persons life without knowing or even making an effort to find out the truth[/quote] I'm not seeing it, so much as wondering and examing it. You can't deny there is a big stereotype for blacks (and other races). No matter how hard we as a soci
Mmm, I'm reminded of the saying...those who cannot be teachers, are administrators.
http://www.abarnett.demon.co.uk/atheism/atheismreligion.html http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/ath/blathm_rel_religion.htm Some helpful links provided by your friendly, hell bound, neighborhood Atheist. Be well, ~Alderic
[quote]I voted for the 'lesser of evils' even though he was a RINO. And, boy, was I right in that opinion.[/quote] I don't get the whole miff about "RINO" people. Sorry, but I grew up with the idea that diversity in any group is a good thing. So, I ask, what is the big deal?
[quote]Liberalism, "progressive" or otherwise is all about creating big government....which leads to Socialism under the Obama administration, government takeover of what should be private enterprise.[/quote] On the contrary lula, you're showing your ignorance. Liberalism, at it's core wouldn't emphasise big government. It comes down to its two modern incarnation: Contemprary ("Welfare") and Classical. In a sense, the modern form of liberalism is a...variance, and perso
[quote]Then what is a system of beliefs essentially a religion. [/quote] You're incorrect in a sense. A set of beliefs does not equate with it being a religion. I have my set of beliefs, does that mean I suddenly am the head (Pope?) of my church? Nein. (See below) [quote]they don't necessary believe in a G-D[/quote] One of the primary things is the refutation of a creator. [quote]Atheism, like theism, is a belief, no
quote]Ya, name one.[/quote] I'm assuming he means classic liberals, as opposed to modern liberals which are largely out of the progressive movement. [quote]The Dems voted for Obama becasue he promised everything...pie in the sky everything...they didn't look past his stump speeches and listened to the fawning mainstream media sell him like he was going to solve their every problem. The whole thing was sickening, but then again Socialism is just th
[quote]Love is an action word. It's not about emotion.[/quote] Funny, I always thought love was an emotion. So much for all my psychology classes. [quote]Love means doing something for someone when you don't necessarily want to. Love is patient, love is kind, love is doing. [/quote][quote]Love is selfless. [/quote] Well said.
[quote]Well, I was looking more for an opinion than a 69', don't forget I still have to come up with the money too. Chances are I will get your opinion way before I get the money.[/quote] Mmm, not so much my opinion as I just would look around for anyone that has one. If nothing else, they could help with an opinion. Be well, ~Alderic
[quote]Did you even comprehend my point?[/quote] I did, but that doesn't necessarily mean that people will go with your idea. Humans are not the most logical beings.
My point was that you've been coming across like you are claiming that secularists are the root of evil, etc. etc. Not saying you shouldnt say that if you believe it, but that it just rubs people the wrong way.
[quote]I'm looking for a 69' Camaro, of course I am also looking for the money needed to purchase the car.[/quote] Haha, arn't we all looking for money? lol A '69 isn't that bad in my opinion. [quote]What can you say? Give me something, besides an 89 Chevy.[/quote] Hmm, I'll see if I know anyone that has a '69.
[quote]I would probably classify Hitler and most the upper eschelon as a New Age Fanatics.[/quote] Fanatic, yes. New Age? Come on, fanatics have been around for a long time. ;) :p lol jk. In a way I could agree with your inferrence (inferring?). It's hard to tell in my opinion, because he was and is a very, very complicated individual. Fascinating really, in the sense of his mind. On one hand he was extremely brilliant, artistic, etc....but on the other hand...wel
[quote]I wouldn't sell you a car I wouldn't drive myself[/quote] Mm, want an '89 Chevy? Free for me, cheap for you. Only 2,000$ ^_^ [quote] This Obamacare Healthcare Bill Obama and is some of the Democrats are so desperate to pass and in such a rush to the point Pelosi has the "legislative throttle at full-speed-ahead" (as Foxnews.com put it), if it is that good, if it's modeled around the "great" (debatable) Canadian and Brittish healthcare sy
[quote]I love how people try to equate that Hilter was a Christian. [/quote] He wasn't Christian per se, but he was definitely religious in a sense. [quote]Now I could say that Atheism causes more death and destruction than any other religion. Now for me to espouse that all atheist...are the primary evil or cause of evil I would be committing a ton of logical fallacies just as if I said religion is the root cause of all wars.[/quote] Well said, and my p
~Charles~ That's the thing, I've also wondered about the issue of race when looking at this incident. Was the person that called the police station doing it because it was a break in, or because it was a black man doing the break in? I agree that the race card and all that is tiring, but given that racism still exists, i think the question should be put out there and investigated. If it wasn't the case then it wasn't the case. As much as I'm sure most people would love to
[quote]ut see AJ, that's what I'm talking about wanting to solve. If I want to sue you for 'pain and suffering' and for whatever else I feel so inclined to sue you for. Let's play with numbers (because I like numbers ) here and say I'm suing you for 250,000 in pain and suffering for whatever injustice I felt you caused me. I being the plantiff would be responsible to pay YOU AJ, the defendent $250K if I (the plantiff) LOSE my law suit against you. With the plantiff knowing that this could
[quote]That's why Christ came. He came to prove that he was from God. He met all the criteria that was set down in the OT and then some. His birthright was not questioned, his miracles were unmatched, his teachings were superb, his authority was felt and recognized, and his resurrection sealed the deal especially to one doubter in the end. So the starting point could be right there. Even non-Christians wrote about this man and his claims.[/quote] That only proves
[quote]Science can't and will never be able to disprove God.[/quote] This is weird, but the more I study philosophy and people like Soren Kierkegaard the more I would have to agree with the idea that God can neither be proven or disproven. The largest reason behind it, is faith. How can you prove something that someone claims is beyond our perception/realm, and has faith in it. (Other things set aside) You can try, sure, and I would support someone in looking for answer
[quote]At what point did I imply in any way that secularists or atheists are the primary cause of evil BEFORE you and "infidel" brought up the theory that religion is the culprit? My article points the finger solely at self-proclaimed followers of a religion, it had nothing to do with secularists or atheists. Then you and "infidel" brought up the idea that "religion" is to be blamed. I tried to keep the focus on the victims, the Christians, by pointing out tha
[quote]Ah, now I understand. Do you agree with the notion that any plaintiff that brings a suit against someone (ethics or civil suit) and the plaintiff loses that the plantiff should pay (time or money) equally as much as they were suiing for?[/quote] Only if there is a legal precedent for it. I don't believe the financial compensation should happen just because they felt like it.I've always had an issue with the whole concept of financial reimbursement for pain and
[quote]I'll just take this moment to point out that the secular murderous bastards in question were/are hardcore ideologues. Insofar as I'm concerned, ideology is indistinguishable from religion. It's also worth pointing out that while ideology can inspire the evil behaviour we're talking about, LACK of ideology has never been the inspiration for it so far as I can tell. Now would the athiests in the room PLEASE avoid knee jerk anti-religious sentiments and acknowledge t
[quote]If that isn't the point, why did you state that religion is the "most notable and consistent" reason for such violence? And suddenly, when it is pointed out that secular murderers have been much more violent, it's not the point any more. Weird.[/quote] >_> Because i was trying to make a point, but whatever...