[quote]True, but the media is leading the way and the rest of us (well some of us) are jumping on the bandwagon when we shouldn't even be taking that trip to nowhere. [/quote] True, unfortunately; I guess it shows how gullible we are as humans. Just walk toward the light at the end of the tunnel...(a train). >_>
Hmm, it seems he edited his post. I guess I'll take it back then.
[quote]Fuck you. Disrespect intended.[/quote] Dude! Seriously, show the lady some respect you immature excuse for a person. God forbid you enage in civilized debate like an intelligent human being. So, why don't you go and cool off, grow up, and then come back and talk. ~Alderic
Speaking of panic, sensationalism, and fear....sounds like someone - pastor - is steering his busload off a cliff. >_> Point KFC, it ain't just the (fill in your condeming term) media, it is politicians, pastors or other religious folks, individual people, etc.
Hmm, you know I did an article along the same lines, and no one comment. For shame, lol. Actually, I've been, seeing as I still am unable to find a job, rebuilding my sister D's and my relationship that crumbled a few months back. Honestly, It's been fantastic. I really feel the connection coming back. As for other things, I've been playing my guitar and teaching myself the piano. ~A
[quote]I think it's time JD gets blacklisted. He's spamming all of us. [/quote] Agreed.
[quote]Problem is that the Republic system of checks and balances in the division of powers that were so very important to the Founders is no more...it has long gone down the drain when the Courts started "legislating" from the bench.[/quote] It's their job, they're to inteperate and uphold laws, etc. [quote]Take the 1973 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision as a prime example...a majority of justices found somewhere a freedom to privacy (later called a woman's right to choose a
[quote]People will soon realize that voting for a President based on the "rock star" factor was a bad idea. It's already showing in his poll numbers which are worse than Bush at the same time.[/quote] How's that a factor? [quote]By the time '10 comes around, Obama and Pelosi will have broken our current system.[/quote] Maybe, we'll see. I'm just going to do my best to help the system and live my life. [quote]There is still plenty of time to get it together. Los
Not to mention a land use tax in the form of park fees, etc. We certainly do know how to tax, heh.
Extreme and offenseive; however, you have your right to speak whatever you want, though I vehemently disagree.
[quote who="IQofSpam" reply="13" id="2180490"]The economy takes years to fully react to policies enacted today. Everything that is happening today is actually all Clinton's fault. [/quote] Evidence? Proof?
[quote]I did so a couple minutes after I posted the first time. The website was pretty convincing at first though.[/quote] Admittedly at first I was shocked, but then I quickly realized the hoax. So yeah, no harm no foul. It's a bit late for april fools though, heh.
[quote]Under the rule of Queen Elizabeth I of England the nation's religion was changed to Anglican, which Elizabeth supported. Those who were found to oppose the Anglican church were beheaded. A country was supposed to believe what their monarch let them believe, this is what the freedom or religion clause was all about, giving people the ability to believe what they wanted to believe without having to fear for their lives. As the nation has evolved so has our ability to dea
[quote]‘10 will be one of the biggest sweeps in history, if we can afford it.[/quote] In terms of political sweeps? I honestly doubt it, unless the GOP can pull a rabbit out of their collectivness. I'm not bashing, so much as stating the stark reality of them painting themselves into a very bad corner.
[quote]Alderic, so why are you sticking your tongue out then? [/quote] Well, because we hardly ever agree. You and I are pretty much as opposite as can be, so far as I've noticed. [quote]Actually, they're talking about pre 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment was adopted on July 9, 1868.[/quote] My bad, I knew that, I so knew that. Duh, Alderic! Forgive me for my momentary ineptness.
~Lula~ For once, we can agree on something. ;p What happened then was unfortunate, to say the least. An interesting note is that one could say that any contempt and/or disregard for the Constitution started there, right off the back. The 14th Amendment should have prevented that, ideally. Since it was established in the US Constitution itself and reads: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction ther
[quote who="IQofSpam" reply="2" id="2180082"] Wow, that is the wierdest thing I've ever heard. I'm not quite sure I believe it just yet, we'll have to see if there are more cases. Beware of the zombie flu![/quote] It's a hoax; take a look at the url first, then google it.
After death, this virus is able to restart the heart of it’s victim for up to two hours after the initial demise of the person where the individual behaves in extremely violent ways from what is believe to be a combination of brain damage and a chemical released into blood during “resurrection.” This reminds me of the movie Shaun of the Dead,lol.
[quote]Well it's all speculation anyway. Hungry dogs are not going to willingly restrict their own time at the gravy bowl. Anyone that brings up such legislation will surely be reprimanded by all (including his/her own). Something like this would have to be a massive grassroots and even then might not get any traction.[/quote] Mhmm, and unfortunately...I don't see that happening. (Blegh, I wish someone would prove me wrong on that, seriously.)
[quote]So going back and forth I can't remember what I said where sort of like AJ said earlier here. [/quote] Mer??? It seems I've forgotten as well.
[quote]If I remember right, it was somebody's opinion. I don't want opinions. I want facts. [/quote] Uh no KFC, it was the Library of Congress. Now, I'm pretty sure they get their facts straight since they're one of, if not the most, pre-eminent library's and archives in the entire US. In fact, historical fact, is that he was one of the people that pushed for the Bill of Rights to be included Hmm, interesting no? Additionally, the term founding fathers, mind you, was or
[quote]That and $300,00. I guess it's worth being stupid?[/quote] Recent Budget: 3+ trillion Photo-op with AF1: 300,000$ Stupidity: Priceless
[quote]Nope and they need to stop making promises as if they could make miracles out of them.[/quote] If we had a politician who said something along the lines of: "Listen, I'm not going to make promises, because chances are they will be impossible to keep with the way things are. I will however, work my ass off for you. I love this country, and I'm going to work for it. I, just like you, want the best out of it and want it to succeed. Failure is not an option." <p
Actually, I take that back - there is something I am going to say, only because it has been bugging me for a long time. This is directed at those who are religious: Would it seem unreasonable to you, that evolution - even as it is mentioned by Darwin, etc. - is a tool of your God? Why does religion/God have to be so mutually exclusive toward evolution?
[quote]I know that the people that believe in the religion of evolution will disagree, I am just pointing out the fact and not denigrating your religious beliefs. [/quote] I disagree, you're being denigrating and a tad pretentious. As for arguing it, I'm not going to bother because you've shown to be immovable in your opinion. All I'm going to do is provide a link or two and hope that you educate yourself, outside of the church doors. http://evolution
You're about to visit an external site:
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates, and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
JoeUser Forums
Stardock Forums