AldericJourdain

AldericJourdain

Joined Member # 3505482
0 Posts 3 Replies 209 Reputation

[quote]What of the really real plight of the Palestinian people? [/quote] Like I said to Leauki, I do not believe - to any measure - that (all) Palestinians are cold blooded monsters. Yeah, there are the leaders who, in my opinion, merely do it for the power (I'm sure some truly dislike Israel,etc.). Yeah, just like in America, there are Palestinians who support people that hardly, if ever, make sense. Surprise, surprise - that's a common thing in the world. [quote]Exactly....

141 Replies 55,522 Views

[quote]Free to those who get it, that's why I said take taxpayers money and provide free services. Nothing is free, it takes money just to collect taxes.[/quote] No, it isn't free to them either; they still pay for it because everyone pays taxes. Hence, those taxes go toward paying it. The idea that these services are free, is a myth, an illusion. You still pay for them; no one cannot not pay taxes. I would venture to say that maybe the only people who don't "pay" are u

23 Replies 4,927 Views

[quote]So basically you are telling me that for you the "Palestinian cause" is not what the "Palestinians" think it is but something humanitarian that you simply named after the "Palestinian cause"? What exactly is your "Palestinian cause" meant to achieve and why is it a "Palestinian cause" and not an "Eskimo cause"?[/quote] PC = food, water, essentials for the women, children and men who are merely trying to live. Not all of them are Jew hating terrorists like you so blindly imply.

141 Replies 55,522 Views

FYI, Leauki: When I talk about the Palestinian cause - I talk about the humanitarian aspect of it. I do not view the government/leaders in palestine and the people of palestine as the same entity; I differentiate. To me, just because there are rotten eggs in a carton - doesn't mean they are all bad. Further, just as with our government and the fact that for us about 98% of incumbents are re-elected, I see the same thing happening in palestine more so because of apathy and really

141 Replies 55,522 Views

[quote]The same goes for any concept that would have the Gov't be the one in control of it and use tax payers money to give free services away.[/quote] T.I.N.S.T.A.A.F.L. (There Is No Such Thing As A Free Lunc) That has to be one of the biggest things that the instructor I had for economics, back in high school, mentioned. Time and again he would say it, and he is absolutely right. Technically, with a few exceptions, none of the services a government provides are free. Someone,

23 Replies 4,927 Views

[quote]but won't you try to relieve the skeptsism of something eventually by checking the info to see if they are fact or fiction? [/quote] Of course I will researching and such. Have I not shown that I put forth the effort to verify things. Hell, I've changed opinions on things and/or admitted that I was wrong after doing that. I've mentioned that/implied it many times just to Nitro. Now, if I'm not getting that across, then just look at what I said right off the bat in this reply.</

75 Replies 14,594 Views

[quote]You did...sort of. You said the piece was bias because of the source. If you left it at that...no problem. But then you went off on a rant about bias... something that is subjective to the reader, and therefore dependent on them. This just seems to be a pattern for you. You feel the need to explain what doesn't need explanation. If someone needs more clarification they will ask for it. Give your readers the same credit you expect for yourself. That's all I'm saying to you, take the adv

75 Replies 14,594 Views

[quote]AJ This is EXACTLY what I was speaking to you about in the other article. Your twisting the intent into something entirely different. Read the article/link if you feel it's biased in some way, post your response/proof/conflicting data and go from there. The only thing you've stated (the obvious) was that bias exists, and your not sure if it is driving this link. More personal theories. You should get into politics because nobody can get a direct response from you on the topic without g

75 Replies 14,594 Views

[quote]Pray tell - how are the facts in the linked article 'biased'?[/quote] I'm not implicitly saying they are, but that they could be. Heck, technically I didn't say they're biased at all, I'm merely implying that things *can* be arranged to fit one's agenda. I even conceded that I could be wrong; however, right now, I'm not going to buy this hook, line, and sinker. This comes from knowing full well the power of the media and what it can do, has done, and will d

75 Replies 14,594 Views

[quote]Facts is facts. Too many media 'sources' are unconcerned with them these days.[/quote] Bias is bias, and "sources," as well facts, images and video can be faked; welcome to the world of yellow journalism. So, like I said, I'm taking this with a grain of salt. ~AJ

75 Replies 14,594 Views

Hmm, while I'm naturally skeptical and have a few questions about the bias/slant of the article, since it is the weekly standard - the thought of what they say Obama is doing, is very, very troubling. If it's true, and he pushes the curtailing of speech - he'll have found a very stubborn and determined opponent, I promise that. ~AJ

75 Replies 14,594 Views

[quote]Yes, everyone saw and understood that you used a hypothetical. All you accomplished was moving the discussion away from the facts to the defense of your word usage. You're under a misconception if you believe that I or anyone else didn't understand what you said[/quote] All you had to do was simply acknowledge that. In the discord of our arugment/discussion, there was no way I could tell that you were acknowledging anything that I said. Your words pushed me to assume you merely

62 Replies 34,417 Views

btw, Nitro, I want to apologize for my temper. It's just annoying when something is simply said and it's either ignored willfully, or whatever. What I said is pretty simply, but yet you, as well as others, just dont seem to get it. I dont know why, and i don't know how much more simple and basic i can get in explaining it. Anyways, again, i apologize for my outuburst. ~AJ

62 Replies 34,417 Views

[quote]And please don't have a fit because no one is indulging your theories. You were called on it, be man enough realize that. Anyone that desires to learn theoretical communism can pick up a copy of Marx's works and get it from the horses mouth and not a groupie.[/quote] If you're being obtuse, which you are in my opinion, I'm going to be blunt about it. Clearly you're seeing what you want to see, because I've acknowledged the failings of communism if it is applied in the world. Yo

62 Replies 34,417 Views

[quote]this is Lucas in a nutshell[/quote] [quote]Everything is wonderful when you remove human nature from the equation - just not realistic.[/quote] Oi, talk about the blind commenting on the (so called) blind, read this: [quote] I realize and agree that it just won't work with the way the world is . However, I think, in theory, it is a noble idea.[/quote] [quote] I'm realistic that in practice, in the real

62 Replies 34,417 Views

[quote]Fox news reported a while ago he was giving it to charity.[/quote] It was a joke... [quote]Communism violates the fundamental rights of man. Think Freedom....there is no freedom under the rule of Communism. No freedom to own property, no freedom of religion. When Castro took over Cuba, he confiscated all the property, lands, buildings, schools, and closed every Church on the island.[/quote] It's safe to say that some people don't believe in the right

62 Replies 34,417 Views

[quote]What give a penny, spend a trillion? I would prefer the Nobel committee to to make out all donations to cover uncontrolled spending directly to the IRS in the future. To Obama, good job bringing the money to the US, much better to keep it out of the hands of those that hate us around the world. I hope you or someone else wins it again next time. Look how nicely it's keeping Al Gore jetting around the world, while his big house is lit up like a Christmas tree, preaching globa

62 Replies 34,417 Views

[quote] You can't feed your family on prestige and publicity AJ. You sound like a very young, inexperienced person to me. Sure, it would be "cool" to have the Olympics in Chicago but it doesn't mean it would be a good thing for the city or state. That whole reality of "someone has to pay for the cool stuff" becomes a problem. Have you lived in a communist country? [/quote] I realize that; I did mention new jobs that would (theoretically) be created. It

62 Replies 34,417 Views

[quote]Thank you. Lots of nations oppose war until it knocks on their door, as it did the US in 1941. Some again people long for the day when we will say no to the world in the interest of peace at home. It is easier to put out a small trash fire than wait until the house is burning.[/quote] Mm, I guess I get what I deserve for being a tad acerbic. That being said, it's all well and easy to be judgmental and high and mighty concerning historical conflicts - they

75 Replies 81,966 Views

[quote]Have you checked our those cities who have had the Olympics and the fact that they are in debt as a result all upon the shoulders and pocketbook of the taxpayers. So, no it wouldn't have been an awesome thing for the people of Chicago or for the State of Illinois. They can't AFFORD IT.[/quote] Yet we can afford other things? Riiiight, well honestly, I would rather "not afford" things that could bring pristige, jobs, publicity, and so on to our country.

62 Replies 34,417 Views

[quote]As for the prize losing value because it was given to someone who hasn't actually done anything...duh! The only ones being political here are the ones on the award panel. They might as well be honest and call it the "Thank God he's Not Bush" award. There have been years where noone merited the award and the cash prize was put back into the commitee. If Obama was all they could come up with this year, they should have kept the prize as a no winner this year.[/quote] You know, I

62 Replies 34,417 Views

[quote]Hmmm, when has he done this? Between N Korea, Iran, Hillary threating to use force if necessary, Obama not backing out of Afghanistan, I don't see where he is promoting any peace at all. Perhaps I am blinded by my opposing views because I am after all Conservative and must contradict Obama even if what he does may saves millions of lives, make our country better and stronger and prove once and for all that Republicans are the real threat.[/quote] o_O Yeah, your views and sarcas

62 Replies 34,417 Views

[quote]yet what have they ever accomplished to that end?[/quote] Gone from a region that was at war constantly to....what was it again...oh right, peace...? There's "just a few"other things too, but I won't bore you with them. [quote]many nations believe they are morally superior to the US... [/quote] Bit of a pronouncement; I mean we're not exactly Jesus now are we? I'm sure we like to think so at times...but anyways. ~AJ

75 Replies 81,966 Views

[quote]I totally agree that forging pictures is both lazy and unethical [/quote] *Nods* Frankly, I find it disgusting that any journalist would do that; however, as I've continued with my journalism studies, I've realized why they do it. Or, at least, some reasons why. I'm concerned about the return of yellow journalism, and the fusion of true , fact based journalism with entertainment (not to mention the business aspect). I fear that journalism, which really is a HUGE part of our cul

43 Replies 7,137 Views