With the Fences 5.89 beta release today, we are creating this thread so that users can report any observed issues. [confluence title=""]https://stardock.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SHC/pages/1709047809/Software+Beta+Insider+Template[/confluence] Thank you for your interest and any time you put into making Fences 5 a better product.
[quote who="jared171" reply="26" id="3963507"] I`m not a computer guy so this needs to be simple. Been using Fences for years & just love it. It`s always worked flawlessly until now. I just upgraded and downloaded the
Stardock Forums
[quote who="marchslm" reply="4" id="3963490"] guys im not ditching my secondary vertical monitor, [/quote] That is not being asked of you - you can still get to other monitors, just 1 at a time. Again, this is not a choice or neglect, its a limitation that Windows itself creates. If we can ever get around it in the future, we certainly will. Sean Drohan Stardock Product Lifecycle Manager
[quote who="ff hash" reply="12" id="3963412"] No luck. I installed on all 4 other PC's however when only show powered is unticked they all disappear. All the computers are connecting now. It turned out the last 2 needed to be connected via IP. Still having issues with the above. The last part is just fixing the connections window so we can see the previews on the screen like the side bar like it was before. [e digicons]:D[/e] I appreciate all the help. [/quote
[quote who="qwerty324" reply="59" id="3963394"] @Neil Banfield, thank you for your reply. Is there a way to download the installers of the last two versions? Start11 v2.5 Changelog (Released 01/15/2025) Start11 v2.11 Changelog (Released 09/09/2024) I think, but am not entirely sure, that I was using 2.11. The problem is that the upgrade process does not make a copy of the downloaded binary. Normally updates g
[quote who="ff hash" reply="10" id="3963328"] Thanks for this. I installed it over 4.01, but it didn't make any difference unless I need to uninstall the previous version entirely? Upon turning on "show computers powered on" button, they disappear again. One last thing I noticed, when it did work the screen would show the other computer's activity instead of just the symbol. If you check my previous post above you'll get what I mean. I appreciate your work and help. [/quote] <p
Stardock Forums
Due to how multiple screen painting works and how Windows doesn't rotate things, it wasn't possible to support vertical monitors in multiple monitor mode, but it should in single. From the screen you posted, click the 'Launch KVM connection screen' button. Connect to your Secondary with the vertical monitor. </
[quote who="magus" reply="26" id="3963275"] Quoting Neil Banfield, reply 14 Open the KVM window. Click the cog. Untick "Only show computers which are powered on" Same issue. This worked flawlessly before I upgraded from the initial release of 4.x to 4.01. [/quote] <
All, Multiplicity 4.0.1.1 Beta has been released. For details, please see: https://forums.stardock.com/534990/multiplicity-4011-beta-feedback As always, thank you for your time, feedback, and support. Sean Drohan Stardock Product Lifecycle Manager
***Reserved***
Known issues While we appreciate all feedback, please remember that we offer no official support for beta \ preview \ developer channel versions of Windows. If you report issues while in any of those early release channels, you should not expect them to be addressed unless it still exists in a retail version of Windows. tbd
[confluence]https://stardock.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SHC/pages/2344812547/Multiplicity+4.0.1.1+Beta+Changelog[/confluence]
With the Multiplicity 4.0.1.1 beta release today, we are creating this thread so that users can report any observed issues. [confluence title=""]https://stardock.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/SHC/pages/1709047809/Software+Beta+Insider+Template[/confluence] Thank you for your interest and any time you put into making Multiplicity 4 a better product.
[quote who="elibarzilay" reply="25" id="3963186"] As for opening a thread for each bug -- I'm dealing with this thing by keeping an open tab -- doing that for around 20 bugs is unmanageable. I'd also argue the "most effective method" point, considering how this is a general basic (old) social tool, and things like GH/GitLab issues are specifically designed for bug reports. [/quote] We appreciate your perspective and it is well received. That said, we have to work
***Reserved***
Known issues While we appreciate all feedback, please remember that we offer no official support for beta \ preview \ developer channel versions of Windows. If you report issues while in any of those early release channels, you should not expect them to be addressed unless it still exists in a retail version of Windows. If you have '
Fences 6 Changelog Please see the press release: https://www.stardock.com/news/534758/fences-6-beta-lands-with-tabs-icon-tint-and-more
With the Fences 6 Public Beta , we are creating this thread so that users can report any observed issues. Obtaining the product Object Desktop members can get the release from within Object Desktop Manager Individual purchases (as well as Objec
[quote who="rer11" reply="50" id="3963173"] Just uninstalled Start11 Beta 2.5.2.0-j201, rebooted, installed Beta 2.5.2.1-j203, rebooted and pleased to report the right click menus for the taskbar icons are now dropping down as intended when the taskbar is on the top of a multi-monitor setup. (Prior to this I am guessing they popped 'upwards' which is off the display) Thank you, now I can get back to work. [e digicons]:)[/e] [/quote] Pleased to read t
[quote who="John Fultz" reply="22" id="3963166"] Reproducible after a clean boot. In the test account, with all services and startup apps disabled (excepting one AV-related startup that wouldn't disable...part of ESET NOD32), with the default-created fences, launching Firefox from a fence was instantaneous without Peek, and took 18s with Peek. It also blanked out the non-primary background image. [/quote] We may have found the cause of this and are looking into i
[quote who="John Fultz" reply="20" id="3963157"] No animated wallpaper. Just one of the stock images that comes with Windows as my background. Further info... * I've tried uninstalling and reinstalling from a fresh download (with reboots in between), and it hasn't changed the behavior. But, notably, when I installed, I didn't let it clear the settings as I wasn't keen to recreate my Fences configuration. If there's a way to export or duplicate the confi
Stardock Forums
[quote quoting="post"] When I first tried Start11, before I paid for it, I created a taskbar pin to a custom filtered folder called "Utest Projects" and used regex inclusion and exclusion rules so it would show folders and apps within "Utest Projects" that I need to quickly open. It all works fine, but one of the sub-folders called "Today", no longer opens when I select "Today" within the menu that appears when I tap the taskbar icon. I use the "Today" sub-folder for automatio
[quote who="sdrohan" reply="31" id="3963152"] Quoting Suterusu1416, reply 30 Sorry that was my mistake. They do have displays attached, yes. I use a cheap keyboard/mouse receiver so Windows thinks there is an interface device attached, but I do not have any local access to the PCs and their monitors are remote via fiber op
[quote who="Suterusu1416" reply="30" id="3963039"] Sorry that was my mistake. They do have displays attached, yes. I use a cheap keyboard/mouse receiver so Windows thinks there is an interface device attached, but I do not have any local access to the PCs and their monitors are remote via fiber optic HDMI, so accessing them directly to restart the service is not trivial. But they are all on the grid. [/quote] Have you tried installing 4.01 on EACH MP PC? Sean Drohan<
[quote who="Mike810" reply="23" id="3963065"] "With the Multiplicity 4.01 release, we are creating this thread so that users can report any observed issues. " We are all reporting in "this thread" as instructed. [/quote] And we welcome and encourage that. However, we try to focus on one reported issue at a time. If there are numerous issues, as elibarzilay detailed, it would be prudent to individualize them in new