The Israelis do occupy some land that is controversial. Israel did take land in war because surrounding Arab neighbors tried to crush Israel. The Israelis returned some of the disputed land; every time they give more land back the attacks only escalate. The notion that Israel is somehow responsible for Sept. 11 or that they had intelligence that the attack was going to happen is ludicrous. Theses articles are blatantly anti-Semitic and offensive. The only people in that region that were jumping
Anthony R
Wed Oct 15, 5:40 PM ET Add Op/Ed - Ann Coulter
If Rob Downey is addicted everyone feels so sorry for this poor guy who can’t get it together. If Limbaugh is addicted everyone is advocating strict and severe punishments, that condition meets the criteria of hypocrisy. Look who’s calling the kettle black.
Smoke em outta their holes -- G W B
>>First, Rush is a hypocrite, no getting around that.>> My mom and dad were hypocrites and said things like “do as I say not as I do,” I never demanded my mom to get sent to the rock pile.
I can’t survive three seconds of Al Qaida Franken at this point. Franken is a foul breed of hyena just like that fat slob Hanoi Moore.
You are starting to post things that are arbitrary at best and incoherent at worst so I will give you a pass from this point forward.
I wasn’t aware that anyone who considered himself a conservative would use the term Neo-Con on another conservative, the only people that usually call me a Neo-Con is the liberals. I guess that would make me a centrist in regard to your ideology. You accuse me of copying from others and then you use an arsenal of standardized arguments that usually comes from either Democrats, Neo-Nazis, or Pat Robertson. When you declared Israel a terrorist nation that is when you cancelled out your
So if one were to fall asleep in Macroeconomic principles that could result in easily falling for blatant lies.
First of all let me start by saying that I never called General George Washington a Kook, I said Washington’s policies were outdated for the needs of the American people and the world. I called Pat Buchanan a kook and my reasons for this assertion lies is his extreme policies pertaining to a return to isolationist views of American relations with the world, as well as his anti-Semitic stance that Israel, our only strategic ally, and the only western style democracy in the region, should be sacri
Buchanan Is a kook, he shares a lot of the isolationist views of General Washington, that was great for the colonists but this is the year 2003. Buchanan and Pat Robertson are part of an extreme fundamentalist wing that I dont subscribe to.
>> a loud-mouthed shill for the neocons>> I don't know when exactly this became the favorite buzz word of the liberals. Obviously it is a derisive term, but what does it mean? NEO: Means new. CON: Short for conservative? Short for conserves? Who knows? Conserves are like preserves, so are they calling us "new jelly"? If so, that's the best insult you can come up with? A synonym for conservative is traditional. Aren't new and traditional antonyms? So t
Admittedly there is a risk in any course we follow other than this, but every lesson in history tells us that the greater risk lies in appeasement, and this is the specter our well-meaning liberal friends refuse to face. . . that their policy of accommodation is appeasement, and it gives no choice between peace and war, only between fight or surrender. If we continue to accommodate, continue to back and retreat, eventually we
So Ted Kennedy and Rush did have something in common, the difference between them is that Rush is going for treatment.
Here are the Liberals, so full of compassion for all of these issues such as drug and alcohol dependence, until a conservative becomes a casualty of the problem, then they become pit bulls. Millions of people that you would never associate with drug addiction become addicted to pain meds after surgery, it is not uncommon. Brett Farve, one of the greatest quarterbacks had a back injury and became hopelessly addicted to the pain meds; did I lose respect for him or start digging up ten y
The current event concerning Limbaugh’s drug habit does raise the question of hypocrisy. How can Limbaugh engage in the bashing of Ted Kennedy for his drunkenness, when Rush is using pills? We certainly have the pot calling the kettle black. I am willing to forgive Rush for his shortcomings because his ideology and way of thinking is much like mine. If the Clintonistas can stand by their guy when he’s too busy raping people and playing with gullible interns to address matters of national se
A problem more threatening to a civilization other than natural disasters is a lack of human cooperation. The problem with vehement opposition in government and the people that support opposing ideologies of those in government is in the division. The earliest examples of civilization, the Mesopotamian and Egyptians had realized that developing a civilization was an extremely creative act; they understood that people had to formulate laws and rules. In order to construct, build and successfully
When Rush announced the problem he was having on the air I was kind of jolted by his admission. Rush is only human and this type of thing happens to millions of people, after surgery you get injected with Demerol and Morphine and I can tell you from experience that pain meds are extremely addictive. I was addicted to pain meds for a few months until I quit taking the pills, it wasn’t easy to do, but I didn’t want to live my life dependant on pills like a “junkie.” The problem for Rush is that o
extreme hubris and arrogance. LOL
In the presidents state of the union I thought he made a good case that if Saddam was a threat now or later, it would have been unwise to sit around and wait for Saddam to become an imminent threat. I was able to get past the 16 words that liberals define as Bush's big lie. Before September the 11th, many in the world believed that Saddam Hussein could be contained. But chemical agents, lethal viruses and shadowy terrorist networks are not easily contained. Imagine those 19 hi
I do not think better communication skills would improve relations between Bush and the liberal Marxists. Reagan was an incredibly good linguist and the liberals hated him regardless of that fact. Liberal cartoonists depicted Reagan as a warmongering lunatic that carried a button for the nukes wherever he went so he could destroy the world at a personal whim.
When Arnold says “I came to California with nothing and California gave me everything” this is not a catch phrase this sounds very genuine and unscripted. It is about time that California recovers from Davis and his Extortion, corruption, and mismanagement of California.
I think that the reason Germans collectively dismiss military action is that WWII stigmatized Germany. The German people still live in the memory of Adolph Hitler’s aggression. Hitler’s fanatical idealism is still a haunting factor in the psyche of the German people. Every country is more cognizant of their history in a more personal way. Americans have never experienced life under dictatorship as Germany has. There is the exception of some far left whacko’s that think Bush a Nazi and
The thing about the 2000 election that highlighted the corrupt nature of the recount demand was that Sore / Loserman wanted to recount the polls only in the areas they thought they could win. If the voting process was so corrupt in Florida then why didn’t they demand to recount the whole state. The Democrats just lost California by 60% that means that 20 % of Democrat constituents voted Republican. This is the worst thing to happen to the Democrats since Democrat constituents stampeded to vote
I could not help but notice that the POV was "we," what is the definition of "we" in this case? Do you mean that someone appointed you the spokesman of the liberals? I thought all liberals were are all on on suicide watch today because greyout Davis and the Dems lost California by a 60% landslide, libs on MSNBC were livid, this is great.